Skip to main content
8 minutes reading time (1565 words)

The open science jungle and ways out of it – OpenAIRE event in Helsinki


What kind of jungle is made up of national and international policies, services and infrastructures of open science? Can this jungle be defined, and can you survive it?

The OpenAIRE event, Making sense of Open Science jungle – optimizing your use of Open Science services, was looking for answers to the above questions in Paasitorni, Helsinki on 12 March 2019. The event was organised by the Helsinki University Library, which is the national open access desk (NOAD) for OpenAIRE in Finland and the Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, which is responsible for the national coordination of open science.

57 people from 24 research organizations from three countries attended the Paasitorni all-day event, and tens of participants participated online.

What are the most important policies?

In his opening speech, Sami Niinimäki, Senior Officer from the Ministry of Education and Culture in Finland sought to clarify the jungle of European policies. Niinimäki listed the most important guidelines for open science.

A key text for Niinimäki was the European Council's Council conclusions paper on the transition to an open science system (27 May 2016), which explicitly deals with open science, as opposed to how many other papers only refer to the theme.

Niinimäki highlighted the key points in the Council's paper's eighteen paragraphs: the most important guidelines related to open access by default (paragraph 10), open access to publications by 2020 (12), openness of research data (14), FAIR principles of data (16) and the need for concerted actions (18).

"These paragraphs are not yet legal regulations, but they must be taken seriously," Niinimäki stressed.

Niinimäki also highlighted the European Union's framework programmes for research and innovation, Horizon 2020 and the subsequent Horizon Europe (2021–2027), which sees open science as a modus operandi. The framework programmes are extremely important in shaping open science policy in Europe.

Sami Niinimäki (right) listed the most important European guidelines for open science. Pauli Assinen, the chair of the event, listening. Photo: Jussi Männistö

Plan S needs services to be realized

In his tight-knit presentation, Niinimäki also focused on another EU recommendation paper (Access to and preservation of scientific information in Europe, 2012), and stressed the importance of the European Research Area (ERA) and the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures.

"When actors like ESFRI work on FAIR data themes, we know that something is really happening," Niinimäki said.

Recently, European science funders' cOAlition S and Plan S have received more attention than other policies. Jyrki Hakapää, Science Adviser from the Academy of Finland, a member of the Plan S coalition, listed the services, infrastructures and policies needed to implement the ambitious Plan S.

Hakapää's list was long: open publishing channels and platforms in various fields, DORA, CC, DOAJ, OpenDOAR, COPE, CLOCKSS, ORCID, I4OC, Sherpa / Romeo, ESAC… But is this list long enough? Hakapää asked the audience to come up with more examples, and they responded:

What infrastructures or services have been forgotten - suggestions from participants

In the public discussion, the Plan S demands were interestingly turned around: the cOAlition S funders who are calling for openness also need to change. A concrete example would be the implementation of the DORA principles: if a research output is evaluated by its own scientific merits and not by its publication channel, this should also be reflected in the evaluation of the funding applications. (Two days after the OpenAIRE event, the Academy of Finland announced that it would implement the DORA principles.)

How can a researcher find EOSC services?

In addition to the open science policy jungle, the OpenAIRE event also focused on the jungle of research services. Particular interest focused on the services provided by the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). However, Saara Kontro, Project Manager from CSC – IT Center for Science and EOSC Secretariat, stressed that as the EOSC process was only in its implementation phase, not much could be said about these services yet.

Launched in November 2018, the EOSC portal ( currently consists of 154 services from 17 service providers. With an ever-expanding range of services, EOSC seeks to support data-driven research and international research collaboration, claimed Kontro. According to the plan, the EOSC will be operational in 2021, by which time European research services will have shifted from "fragmentation to a federated model" with unified access to services.

Saara Kontro presented summary of the EOSC-projects and which of them have Finnish partners (more about projects in Kontro's presentation, page 8). Photo: Jussi Männistö
 In the public discussion and in the workshop session, the participants considered the researcher's perspective as crucial: Why would a researcher choose EOSC services if different services are available? According to Saara Kontro, EOSC services have the advantage of a wider range and interoperability. For Pauli Assinen, Head of Development from Helsinki University Library (OpenAIRE NOAD), interoperability is the key concept in the EOSC – but at the same time, one of its greatest challenges.

The scope and quality of EOSC services also raised questions. How can a researcher find the most suitable service from an ever-expanding service catalogue? How can services be valued? During the discussion, the idea of a service search engine was raised. According to Ville Tenhunen, IT Project Manager from the IT Center of the University of Helsinki, universities could also tailor their own search applications for researchers to find services.

Participants' awareness of the EOSC-services was asked in the workshop. Photo: Jussi Männistö

To sum up, support for finding services is sorely needed. A small survey taken during the workshop showed that as many as 66% of the current EOSC catalogue's services were not familiar to any of the participants. The best-known services were Zenodo, Eduroam, B2DROP and Figshare.

Metadata plays a key role in gathering information on European research

The OpenAIRE portal also ranked the top 10 most well-known EOSC services in the survey taken in the workshop session. The OpenAIRE portal gathers information, full texts and data on European research. Institutional repositories play an important role in producing this information – the metadata they provide should be suitable for OpenAIRE harvesting.

In his presentation Jochen Schirrwagen demonstrated the importance of the metadata. Photo: Jussi Männistö

In a survey conducted by the Helsinki University Library last year, Finnish institutional repositories expressed their views and experiences on OpenAIRE harvesting. According to the survey, repository managers support stronger national coordination in OpenAIRE harvesting, and also reported that the VIRTA service can be utilized for centralized OpenAIRE harvesting. The VIRTA publication information service compiles information on Finnish research and covers about 60 000 publications a year.

Wishes often come true, and Joonas Nikkanen, Project Manager from CSC, responsible for the VIRTA service, presented the OpenAIRE integration, which will be implemented this year. According to Nikkanen, the centralized OpenAIRE harvesting of Finnish research's metadata is not only smart but also relatively easy, and the technology is ready. Basically, OpenAIRE is only one of the VIRTA API utilisers. However, producing high-quality metadata data will still require work of metadata producers.

What about the Finnish jungle?

At the end of his opening speech, Sami Niinimäki also briefly discussed the Finnish open science scene. Of particular importance to Niinimäki was the coordinating role of the Federation of Finnish Learned Societies (Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta, TSV) in open science activities in Finland.

Sami Niinimäki presented open science actions in Finland.

Henriikka Mustajoki, Head of Development at TSV, introduced the Finnish Open Science Coordination, which began activities last year. The coordination model is based on open involvement and collaboration, and covers the research community very widely. Compared to other countries in Europe, this is quite a unique way of organizing open science activities. The Open Science Coordination model is presented more specifically on

Henriikka Mustajoki introduced work done in the field of open science. Ville Tenhunen and Jari Friman listening. In the background mural painting by Hungarian János Rozs from 1939. Photo: Jussi Männistö

According to Mustajoki, the open science to-do list in Finland contains agreat deal of extensive tasks, such as the new roadmap for open science, the national recommendation for responsible metrics, the national strategy for open access and the open data strategy.

In research data issues, Finland is one of the international forerunners, and at the moment, the only national contact point for Research Data Alliance (RDA) in the Nordic countries is the RDA Finnish Node. At the Paasitorni event, RDA Finland's new coordinator Heidi Laine from CSC presented the RDA's work on open data.

In her presentation Heidi Laine described, how RDA supports researchers in open data jungle. Photo: Jussi Männistö

With regard to jungles, the RDA helps researchers by creating consistent practices and tools to enable the open sharing and re-use of data. From the Finnish perspective, Laine listed the most urgent issues – RDA outputs, which need to be localized: Metadata Standards Directory, Scalable dynamic data citation methodology, Workflows for Research Data Publishing, and Persistent Identifier Type Registry.

The presentations and recordings from the Making sense of Open Science jungle event have been published and are available at

There you find also Event summary-document, in which there is information about speakers, whole results of the workshop and results of the feedback, e.g. participants' takeaways.

Text: Juuso Ala-Kyyny, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Library

Photos: Jussi Männistö, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Library

Stay Informed

When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.

Related Posts