Skip to main content
new checklist  helps you find out!

Across research-performing organisations and funding bodies, a central question is gaining prominence: Do infrastructures effectively support responsible, transparent, and inclusive research assessment?

Many institutions have already committed to the principles outlined in the CoARA Agreement. They aim to move toward more contextual, fair, and diverse approaches to recognising contributions. Yet in practice, assessment workflows often continue to depend on systems that were not designed with these commitments in mind. Closed systems, limited interoperability, commercial lock-in, and opaque decision processes can unintentionally undermine efforts toward reform.

To address this gap, the CoARA Working Group Towards Open Infrastructures for Responsible Research Assessment (OI4RRA), co-chaired by OpenAIRE and CWTS, has developed a practical tool to support institutions in aligning their infrastructures with their policy objectives.

Introducing the Open Infrastructure Checklist

A structured, accessible guide that assists organisations in evaluating whether a given infrastructure is suitable for responsible research assessment.

Rooted in the OI4RRA Framework, the checklist translates its core principles into actionable considerations across four dimensions: technical robustness, operational capacity, community-centred governance, and ethical and inclusive foundations. These dimensions, clearly presented in framework output, enable teams to assess infrastructures in a systematic and transparent manner.

Its strength lies in its clarity. Rather than offering an exhaustive technical manual, the checklist supports targeted analysis and informed organisational discussions. As teams work through it, they often gain clearer insight into the capabilities and limitations of their existing systems. Some infrastructures may align well with open, transparent assessment practices; others may reveal challenges such as insufficient auditability, limited interoperability, or dependencies that constrain long-term strategic planning.

The checklist does not judge; it facilitates reflection and informed decision-making.

Equally important, it provides a shared reference point for different institutional stakeholders. Research managers, funding officers, IT services, libraries, and policy teams can use it collaboratively, ensuring that infrastructure decisions are consistent with the organisation’s broader strategy for research assessment reform.

Its development reflects the same collaborative philosophy. The checklist was refined with input from practitioners during the Open Science Fair 2025 workshop ‘’Collaborative Pathways to Responsible Research Assessment’’ Open Science FAIR - Collaborative Pathways to Responsible Research Assessment via Open Infrastructures and informed by the experience of a diverse range of organisations contributing to the Working Group.

The checklist is useful not only for organisations beginning their reform journey, but also for those already engaged in implementing responsible assessment practices. It can support procurement processes, internal reviews, policy development, and long-term planning related to research information systems and assessment infrastructures.The most effective way to understand its value is to apply it.

  • Set aside a short amount of time with your team.
  • Review the checklist together.
  • Consider how the infrastructure you wish to transition to aligns with your goals.

Whether it confirms your current approach or highlights areas for further development, the checklist provides a constructive foundation for strengthening assessment systems in line with institutional commitments.

As assessment reform accelerates globally, tools like this support organisations in ensuring that their infrastructures keep pace with policy ambitions. Transparent, open, interoperable, and community-governed systems are increasingly recognised as essential components of trustworthy research evaluation.

Explore the checklist here ! 

Use it to guide your next steps toward responsible research assessment.

From bold principles to real-world change: at the Open Science Fair 2025 in Geneva, the workshop “Collaborative Pathways to Responsible Research Assessment via Open Infrastructures” tackled the pressing question of how to truly reform research assessment. The global debate has moved beyond why change is needed; now it’s about how to build the infrastructures, both technical and social, that can turn vision into practice.

Get ready to dive into the most pressing debates, innovative sessions, and emerging trends that will define OSFair 2025. Explore all the details, stay ahead and discover what’s driving the next era of Open Science. Read the full agenda before starting to pack for your OSFair journey!

Reflections from Pisa on Open Science, assessment reform, and the future shaped by GraspOS

On 12–13 November 2025, around 140 people—some onsite at the CNR headquarters in Pisa, others joining online—gathered for Opening Research Assessment, the final conference of the GraspOS project. The event marked the end of three years of work on rethinking how Europe evaluates research—and the beginning of a broader movement to make assessment more transparent, humane, and aligned with Open Science.

From the start, the tone was set by a simple truth: we are living in a research world where meaning often gets lost, either in the silences of the past or in the overload of the present.

Newton, whose unpublished notes remained hidden for years because dissemination was slow and expensive, would probably struggle in today’s environment for opposite reasons. Instead of ideas locked in drawers, we have ideas buried under a flood of publications, metrics, and dashboards. Today, the situation is inverted compared to a decade ago. Research publications are abundant, but the final goal of these productions are career and metric-oriented. Yet the very abundance generates noise. Groundbreaking work can drown in a sea of papers. The silence of the past has become the overload of the present. And so, the conference opened with a question that shaped the entire discussion: what kind of research assessment system helps us find meaning rather than noise?

GraspOS and a shared infrastructure for the future

Supporting Open Science–aligned reforms and Europe’s future EOSC ecosystem

Rather than ending with a report, GraspOS has created a solid, reusable foundation for responsible research assessment. Its work produced a federated and open assessment infrastructure; a catalogue of contextualised indicators; narrative CV templates co-designed with research institutions; pilots across universities, funders, and national initiatives; and practical guidelines for implementing Open Science–aligned reforms.

These resources now form a shared toolbox for researchers, RPOs, RFOs, national services, and research infrastructures, offering a roadmap for those navigating CoARA commitments and preparing to align with future EOSC standards. GraspOS leaves not a legacy but a living infrastructure—one designed to grow with the community.

Open Science as the lens that reveals real contributions

Why open infrastructures matter in today’s research assessment ecosystem

In her talk, Giulia Malaguarnera explored the shift from noise to clarity. 
Traditional evaluation systems rely heavily on proprietary databases and citation metrics originally designed for bibliometrics—not for shaping careers or guiding funding decisions. Used mechanically, these metrics have contributed to a culture of hyper-production, ranking pressure, and burnout.

Open infrastructures offer a different path. 
The OpenAIRE Graph, enriched through ORCID, ROR, and community-driven contributions, provides transparent and reproducible metadata that make diverse research practices visible—data stewardship, software development, interdisciplinary collaborations, community engagement, early dissemination. OpenCitations, as mentioned by Silvio Peroni, alongside the OpenAIRE Graph, represents an essential alternative to proprietary citation databases, helping prevent misuse of citation indicators and offering a more open foundation for analysis.

Together, they create an ecosystem where evaluation is grounded in openness and context, not in opaque metrics or closed systems.

OpenAIRE MONITOR complements this by offering institutions and funders a way to follow their Open Science strategies using verifiable evidence, while MyResearchFolio introduces narrative elements that help researchers explain the reasoning, evolution, and impact behind their work—without sacrificing structure or comparability.

What the community asked for: clarity, guidance, and trustworthy foundations

How institutions navigate the shift toward more responsible assessment

Participants from Research Performing and Funding Organisations (RPOs and RFOs) across Europe converged around a similar set of challenges. They want to embrace responsible research assessment, but need guidance on fair narrative CVs, on how to contextualise indicators, and on how to build internal workflows aligned with CoARA commitments.

When real MyResearchFolio profiles were shown—connected to ORCID and the OpenAIRE Graph—the response was immediate. Institutions saw a path to adopting narrative CVs in a way that is structured, interoperable, and meaningful.

Similarly, OpenAIRE MONITOR attracted the audience’s interest for its capacity to track Open Access and Open Science practices using open, reproducible data—avoiding the biases of proprietary sources and supporting evidence-based policy.One participant distilled the mood: “We don’t need more indicators. We need indicators we can trust and understand.”

A shared lesson: context is the new currency of evaluation

Why responsible research assessment depends on openness, interoperability, and co-creation

By the end of the event, an important consensus had taken shape: responsible assessment is neither metric-free nor metric-led—it is context-led. 
Indicators without interpretation mislead. Narrative alone is insufficient. 
Interoperability—between identifiers, metadata sources, infrastructures—is essential to ensure that meaning travels across systems, committees, and countries.

“If we want research assessment to be fair, transparent, and future-proof, we must build it on open infrastructures and co-create it with the communities who will use it.” -Giulia Malaguarnera, OpenAIRE

How OpenAIRE supports researchers, RPOs, and RFOs in research assessment reform 

Asset 1

Looking ahead: from overload to understanding

The Pisa conference made one thing evident: Europe is not only revising its research assessment systems—it is redefining the purpose of evaluation itself. OpenAIRE will continue strengthening its infrastructures, expanding pilots, and supporting national and institutional strategies, helping organisations move from policy commitments to day-to-day practice.

The goal is not to measure more, but to understand better, ensuring that excellent research—whether once trapped in Newton’s notebooks or now buried under today’s publication overflow—finally becomes visible.

If you are an RPO or RFO and you wish to discover the possibilities for your institution to adopt any of the OpenAIRE Services, contact Giulia Malaguarnera via helpdesk@openaire.eu.

Research assessment shapes careers, funding, and institutional priorities, yet many systems remain opaque and exclusive. Relying on proprietary, black-box metrics, they fail to capture the full diversity of research contributions and global scholarship. To change this, the CoARA Working Group ‘’Towards Open Infrastructures for Responsible Research Assessment’’ (OI4RRA) has developed a framework that outlines how Open Infrastructures (OIs) can support a fair, transparent, and responsible approach to research assessment. Dive into details!

OpenAIRE and OPERAS have officially joined the second wave of the EOSC Federation as the EOSC Scholarly Commons Node. This partnership represents a strategic alignment to ensure that scholarly communication  is natively integrated into the European Open Science Cloud. Learn more.

The 2025 CoARA Working Group Co-Chairs Forum, held on 12–13 November in Graz, marked an important moment of transition for the Coalition. With most first-wave Working Groups approaching the end of their formal mandate, the meeting served as both a retrospective and a forward-looking exercise: assessing what has been achieved, where challenges remain, and how the substantial labour invested across WGs can continue to support CoARA’s evolving mission.