LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1

Flexible Expertise in Senior Executives

Title
Flexible Expertise in Senior Executives
Funding
ARC | Linkage Projects
Contract (GA) number
LP0669552
Start Date
2006/01/01
End Date
2011/12/31
Open Access mandate
no
Organizations
-
More information
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP0669552

 

  • Bayesian analysis of individual level personality dynamics.

    Cripps, E.; Wood, R.E.; Beckmann, N.; Lau, J.; Beckmann, J.F.; Cripps, S.A. (2016)
    Projects: ARC | Flexible Expertise in Senior Executives (LP0669552)
    A Bayesian technique with analyses of within-person processes at the level of the individual is presented. The approach is used to examine if the patterns of within-person responses on a 12 trial simulation task are consistent with the predictions of ITA theory (Dweck, 1999). ITA theory states that the performance of an individual with an entity theory of ability is more likely to spiral down following a failure experience than the performance of an individual with an incremental theory of ab...

    Beyond psychometrics : the difference between difficult problem solving and complex problem solving.

    Beckmann, J.F.; Birney, D. P.; Goode, N. (2017)
    Projects: ARC | Flexible Expertise in Senior Executives (LP0669552)
    In this paper we argue that a synthesis of findings across the various sub-areas of research in complex problem solving and consequently progress in theory building is hampered by an insufficient differentiation of complexity and difficulty. In the proposed framework of person, task, and situation (PTS), complexity is conceptualized as a quality that is determined by the cognitive demands that the characteristics of the task and the situation impose. Difficulty represents the quantifiable lev...
  • No project research data found
  • Scientific Results

    Chart is loading... It may take a bit of time. Please be patient and don't reload the page.

    PUBLICATIONS BY ACCESS MODE

    Chart is loading... It may take a bit of time. Please be patient and don't reload the page.

    Publications in Repositories

    Chart is loading... It may take a bit of time. Please be patient and don't reload the page.

Share - Bookmark

App Box