LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Юринець, Юлія Леонідівна (2014)
Publisher: Національний Авиаційний Університет
Languages: Ukrainian
Types: Unknown
Subjects: адміністративне право, антропологія права, ієрархічні структури, законність, забезпечення прав та свобод громадян засобами адміністративного права, УДК 342.9 + 340.12(045), административное право, антропология права, иерархические структуры, законность, обеспечение прав и свобод граждан средствами административного права, administrative law, anthropology, law, hierarchical structures, laws, protection of rights and freedoms by means of administrative law
З методологічних позицій антропології права розглянуті витоки адміністративного права та обґрунтовані переважно правозабезпечувальна й правозахисна функції адміністративного права С методологических позиций антропологии права рассмотрены истоки административного права и обоснованы преимущественно правообеспечительная и правозащитная функции административного права From the methodological point of law considered anthropology sources of administrative law and justified mainly pravoobespechitelnaya and advocacy functions of administrative law. English abstractJ. Yurinets Right interim and advocacy functions of administrative law: an anthropological dimensionFrom the methodological positions anthropology of law the sources of administrative law and justified mainly right interim and advocacy functions of administrative law. Taken into account that the modern science of administrative law to distinguish between the two models: the closed model, which corresponds to an authoritarian management model and open model that reflects the nature of European administrative law in developed democracies. Ideologically Ukraine seeks to implement an open model of administrative law, but it is given with great difficulty, especially in applied areas of administrative law. Therefore, further research about the true role of administrative law. To justify an open model of administrative law by using ethological and anthropological approaches , based on what is already in the groups of primitive man existed in the form of management dominance of power most biologically strong and aggressive individual, leader might indication that his desire to arbitrary power. This is typical for people to gather in programs instinctive hierarchical pyramid. However, the arbitrariness of the ancient leaders are not always encouraged by natural selection. Therefore, even at the initial stages of development of human societies have developed rules (taboos), limiting the arbitrary power hierarchy, and later in transformation laws. Thus, the true purpose of law - limit arbitrariness hierarchy (leader), not strengthen it additional tools. This principle is known by the ancient Romans, which emphasized that the law and order details to curtail the power of the strongest. Thus, if the administrative law - a right, not a set of instructions to officials concerned, showing the relationship between society and government, it must, first and foremost, must address issues of power constraints, ensuring the rights of citizens. This naturally raises Right interim and advocacy functions of administrative law.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.