Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Рибікова, Ганна Володимирівна; Національний авіаційний університет; Грекова, Лілія Юріївна; Національний авіаційний університет (2016)
Publisher: Національний Авиаційний Університет
Languages: Ukrainian
Types: Unknown
Subjects: search; personal search; investigative (detective) act, 343.12, обыск; личный обыск; следственное (розыскное) действие, обшук; особистий обшук; слідча (розшукова) дія
The institution of search in the effective Criminal Procedure Law has been largely developed, as some issues, important for this investigatory (inquiry) operation, were described more in detail, issues such as:  grounds for search, the implementation order of investigating judge’s decision concerning the search procedure indicating an exhaustive number of its participants, the obligation to take appropriate measures to ensure the presence of persons whose rights and legitimate interests may be limited or violated, handing of a second copy of the search protocol to the person who was searched, or to an adult member of his/her family or to his/her representative in case of his/her absence and others. For instance, the problem of identifying officials to whom a copy of the search protocol should be handed over during the search of the enterprise, institution or organization, was regulated. However, there are issues that require further research: lack of a legal definition of "search", "personal search", referring of a vehicle search to personal search in some cases, determination of the term within which the investigator or the prosecutor is obliged to apply for a search to the investigating judge in case it was carried out without judgment. The object of this article is to study some of the problems occurring during search and to find ways of their settlement. The article deals with these issues more in detail and is based on foreign experience (Russian Federation, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Republic of Belarus, Poland and France). The author proposes several changes to the current legislation in order to improve legal regulation based on the research of some problems in legal regulation of search procedures. Статья посвящена таким проблемам правового регулирования обыска в Украине, как отсутствие легального определения понятий «обыск», «личный обыск», отнесение процедуры обыска автотранспортного средства в некоторых случаях к личному обыску, определение срока, в течение которого следователь или прокурор обязан обратиться с ходатайством о проведения обыска к следственному судье в случае его проведения без решения. Авторы обратили внимание на зарубежный опыт регулирования указанных проблем. Стаття присвячена таким проблемам правового регулювання обшуку в Україні, як відсутність легального визначення понять «обшук», «особистий обшук», віднесення процедури обшуку автотранспортного засобу у деяких випадках до особистого обшуку, визначення строку, протягом якого слідчий або прокурор зобов’язаний звернутися з клопотанням про проведення обшуку до слідчого судді у випадках його проведення без ухвали. Автори звернули увагу на зарубіжний досвід регулювання зазначених проблем.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.