Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Michalska-Warias, Аneta; Університет Марії Кюрі-Склодовської (2016)
Publisher: Національний Авиаційний Університет
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: організована злочинність; злочинне співтовариство; організована злочинна група, 343.2/.7, organised crime; criminal association; organised criminal group, организованная преступность; преступное сообщество; организованная преступная группа
У статті розглядаються проблеми, пов’язані з визначенням організованої злочинності з точки зору матеріального кримінального права. Автор також розглядає норми польського кримінального законодавства, які спрямовані на боротьбу з цим суспільно небезпечним явищем. Polish criminal law does not use the term “organised crime” and, since criminological definitions of that term are to serve different purposes, they are of limited usefulness for defining the terms which refer to organised criminal activity in the legal statutes. Article 258 of the binding Criminal Code of 1997 clearly states that whoever the participates in an organised group or association which have the aim to commit an offence or a fiscal offence is guilty of a misdemeanor punished with imprisonment from 3 months to 5 years. If the group or association is armed with weapons or intends to commit a terrorist-type offence, the punishment is from 6 months to 8 years of imprisonment, and the punishment becomes even higher if the offender is guilty of establishing or directing such criminal structures. The definition of these two types of criminal bodies is left to the courts and scholars and there is a general consensus that both types of structures have to consist of at least three members, both have to present some stability in time (so they cannot be randomly formed for the immediate commission of the offence) and in order to be organised both need to manifest some kind of structure, while the main difference between them lies in the achieved organisational level which is higher in the case of a criminal association. Yet, it has to be stressed that distinguishing the two forms can only be done in concrete cases since both an association and a group can have only 3 members and then the requirements connected with considering such entities organised would be different than in the cases of more numerous structures. On this basic level it can be argued that a criminal association absolutely needs to have a leader (and a hierarchy), while this is not necessary in the case of smaller organised criminal groups. This interpretation can be also be inferred from some Supreme Court judgments referring to the practical application of Article 258 of the Criminal Code. The substantial criminal law framework of responsibility for crimes committed  by organised structures is complemented by some general part solutions which create both the obligation to aggravate the punishment for offenders belonging to criminal groups (Article 65 of the Criminal Code) and create the possibility to reduce the responsibility of those gang members who decide to co-operate with the law enforcement organs and reveal the circumstances of the offence and the identity of the other perpetrators (Article 60 § 3-5 of the Criminal Code). В статье рассматриваются проблемы, связанные с определением организованной преступности с точки зрения материального уголовного права. Автор также обсуждает нормы польского уголовного законодательства, которые направленны на борьбу с этим общественно опасным явлением.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.