Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Chen, Wilbur Y.; Dool, Huug M. Van Den (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Beyond the deterministic limit where the initial value sensitive predictability can hardly befound, the boundary condition dependent potential predictability is examined. The tropicalanomalies of the opposite phases of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) can significantlychange the extratropical natural variability on a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. Weaddress the impact on the low-frequency variability, such as the persistent blocking flows, andthe high-frequency variability, represented primarily by the storm tracks. The NCEP/NCARreanalyses are used for this investigation. Several diagnostics tools help to reveal the dynamicalprocesses leading to the large change of the natural variability and the potential predictabilityin the extratropical latitudes between these two phases of the ENSO cycle. During El Niño winters, the principal storm tracks are steered more into the southern and Baja Californiaregion, by the much eastward extended subtropical jets. On the other hand, the storms arediverted more into the higher latitudes (Aleutians and Gulf of Alaska) during La Niña winters,when jetstreams are much weaker east of 160°W. Although being passively steered to widelydifferent regions, the high-frequency transients do feed back actively to strengthen and maintainthe subtropical jet across the central North Pacific and also act to slow down the equatorwardflank of the jet. The feedback by the transients is stronger during the El Niño than the La Niñawinters, helping in maintaining stronger signals from the tropics for the El Niño winters. Thereis also a large change of low-frequency variability: much larger magnitude of kinetic energyand height variance during La Niña than El Niño winters. The local barotropic energy diagnosisreveals that, on average, the low-frequency components extract more energy from time-meanflows during La Niña than El Niño winters, helping in explaining the presence of much largerlow-frequency variability during the La Niña winters. With stronger ENSO signals and weakernatural variability during El Niño winters, the potential predictability in the north Pacific sectoris significantly higher, on these two counts, than during the La Niña winters.DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0870.1999.00017.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barnett, T. P. 1995. Monte Carlo climate forecasting. J. Climate 8, 1005-1022.
    • Barnston, A. G. and Livezey, R. E. 1987. Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Mon. Wea. Rev. 115, 1083-1126.
    • Blackmon, M. L., Wallace, J. M., Lau, N.-C. and Mullen, S. L. 1977. An observational study of the Northern Hemisphere wintertime circulation. J. Atmos. Sci. 34, 1040-1053.
    • Blackmon, M. L., Geisler, J. E. and Pitcher, E. J. 1983. A general circulation model study of January climate anomaly patterns associated with interannual variation of equatorial Pacific sea surface temperatures. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 1410-1425.
    • Cai, Ming and Huug van den Dool. 1992. Low-frequency waves and traveling storm tracks. Part II: Baroclinic component. J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 2506-2524.
    • Chen, Wilbur Y. and Huug van den Dool. 1995. Low frequency variabilities for widely diVerent basic flows. T ellus 47A, 526-540.
    • Chen, Wilbur Y. and Huug van den Dool. 1997a. Asymmetric impact of tropical SST anomalies on atmospheric internal variability over the north Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 725-740.
    • Chen, Wilbur Y. and Huug van den Dool. 1997b. Atmospheric predictability of seasonal, annual, and decadal climate means and the role of the ENSO cycle: a model study. J. Climate 10, 1236-1254.
    • Chervin, R. M. 1986. Interannual variability and seasonal climate predictability. J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 233-251.
    • Cubash, U. 1985. The mean response of the ECMWF global model to the composite El Ni n˜o anomaly in the extended range prediction experiments. Coupled ocean-atmosphere models (ed. Nihoul, J.). Elsevier Science, pp. 329-344.
    • Dole, R. M. 1986. Persistent anomalies of the extratropical Northern Hemisphere wintertime circulation: Structure. Mon. Wea. Rev. 114, 178-207.
    • Holopainen, E. O., Rontu, L. and Lau, N.-C. 1982. The eVect of large-scale transient eddies on the time mean flow in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 1972-1984.
    • Horel, J. D. and Wallace, J. M. 1981. Planetary scale atmospheric phenomena associated with the Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 109, 813-829.
    • Hoskins, B. J. and Karoly, D. J. 1981. The steady linear response of a spherical atmosphere to thermal and orographic forcing. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 1179-1196.
    • Hoskins, B. J., James, I. and White, G. H. 1983. The shape, propagation, and mean flow interaction of large-scale weather systems. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 1595-1612.
    • Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M. et al. 1995. The NCEP/ NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteo. Soc. 77, 437-471.
    • Kumar, A., Hoerling, M., Ji, M., Leetmaa, A. and Sardeshmukh, P. 1996. Assessing a GCM's suitability for making seasonal predictions. J. Clim. 9, 115-129.
    • Lau, N. C. 1981. A diagnostics study of recurrent meteorological anomalies appearing in a 15-year simulation with a GFDL general circulation model. Mon. Wea. Rev. 109, 2287-2311.
    • Lau, N. C. 1988. Variability of the observed midlatitude storm tracks in relation to low-frequency changes in the circulation patterns. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 2718-2743.
    • Leith, C. E. 1973. The standard error of time-average estimates of climatic means. J. Appl. Meteorol. 12, 1066-1069
    • Lin, H. and Derome, J. 1997. On the modification of the high- and low-frequency eddies associated with the PNA anomaly: an observational study. T ellus 49A, 87-99.
    • Madden, R. A. 1976. Estimates of the natural variability of time-averaged sea-level pressure. Mon. Wea. Rev. 104, 942-952.
    • Mak, M. and Cai, M. 1989. Local barotropic instability. J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 3289-3311.
    • Miyakoda, K., Sirutis, J. and Ploshay, J. 1986. Onemonth forecast experiments - without anomaly boundary forcings. Mon. Wea. Rev. 114, 2363-2401.
    • Nakamura, H. and Wallace, J. M. 1990. Observed changes in the baroclinic wave activity during the life cycles of low-frequency circulation anomalies. J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 1100-1117.
    • Opsteegh, J. D. and van den Dool, H. M. 1980. Seasonal diVerences in the stationary response of a linearized primitive equation model: Prospects for long-range weather forecasting? J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 2169-2185.
    • Palmer, T. N. 1988. Medium and extended range predictability and stability of the Pacific/North American mode. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 114, 691-713.
    • Rasmusson, E. M. and Wallace, J. M. 1983. Meteorological aspects of the El Ni n˜o/Southern Oscillation. Science 222, 1195-1202.
    • Shukla, J. 1983. On physical basis and feasibility of monthly and seasonal prediction with a large GCM. Long-range forecasting research publications series, no. 11. WMO, 142-153.
    • Shutts, G. J. 1983. The propagation of eddies in diZuent jet streams: Eddy vorticity forcing of blocking flow fields. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 109, 737-761.
    • Simmons, A. J., Wallace, J. M. and Branstator, G. W. 1983. Barotropic wave propagation and instability, and atmospheric teleconnection patterns. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 1363-1392.
    • Smith, T. M., Reynolds, R. W., Livezey, R. E. and Stokes, D. C. 1996. Reconstruction of historical sea surface temperature using empirical orthogonal functions. J. Climate 9, 1403-1420.
    • Trenberth, K. E. 1985. Potential predictability of geopotential heights over the Southern Hemisphere. Mon. Wea. Rev. 55, 54-64.
    • Trenberth, K. E. 1986. An assessment of the impact of transient eddies on the zonal flow during a blocking episode using localized Eliassen-Palm flux diagnostics. J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 2070-2087.
    • Wallace, J. M. and Blackmon, M. L. 1983. Observation of low-frequency atmospheric variability. L arge-scale dynamical processes in the atmosphere (eds. Hoskins, B. J. and Pearce, R. P.). Academic Press, pp. 55-94.
    • Zwiers, F. W. 1987. A potential predictability study conducted with an atmospheric general circulation model. Mon. Wea. Rev. 115, 2957-2974.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok