Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ruokolainen, Leena; Räisänen, Jouni (2007)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
The authors of this study recently proposed a resampling method for deriving probabilistic forecasts of near-term climate change and presented some results focusing on temperature and precipitation changes in southern Finland from 1971–2000 to 2011–2020. Here, the sensitivity of the resulting forecasts to two details of the methodology is studied. First, to account for differences between simulated and observed climate variability, a variance correction technique is devised. Second, the sensitivity of the forecasts to the choice of the baseline period is studied. In southern Finland, the variance correction technique generally widens the derived probability distributions of precipitation change, mirroring an underestimate of the observed precipitation variability in climate models. However, the impact on the derived probability distributions of temperature change is small. The choice of the baseline period is generally more important, but again the forecasts of temperature change are less sensitive to different options than those of precipitation change. Crossverification suggests that the variance correction leads to a slight improvement in the potential quality of the probabilistic forecasts, especially for precipitation change. The optimal baseline length appears to be at least 30 yr, and the baseline should be as late as possible (e.g. 1971–2000 is preferable over 1961–1990).
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • AchutaRao, K. and Sperber, K. R. 2006. ENSO simulation in coupled ocean-atmosphere models: are the current models better? Climate Dyn. 27, 1-15.
    • ACIA 2005. Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1042.
    • Allen, M. R. and Ingram, W. J. 2002. Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419, 224-232.
    • Candille, G. and Talagrand, O. 2005. Evaluation of probabilistic prediction systems for a scalar variable. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131, 2131-2150.
    • Cubasch, U., Meehl, G. A., Boer, G. J., Stouffer, R. J., Dix, M. and co-authors. 2001. Projections of future climate change. In: Climate change 2001. The Scientific Basis (eds J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 525-582.
    • Giorgi, F. and Merns, L. O. 2003. Probability of regional climate change based on Reliability Ensemble Averaging (REA) method. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1629. (doi:10.1029./2003.GL0171.30).
    • Hersbach, H. 2000. Decomposition of the continuous ranked probability score for ensemble prediction systems. Weather Forecast. 15, 559- 570.
    • IPCC 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. (To be updated when full bibliographic information available).
    • Mearns, L. O., Hulme, M., Carter, T. R., Leemans, R., Lal, M. and co-authors. 2001. Climate scenario development. In: Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis (eds J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 739-768.
    • Mitchell, T. D. and Jones, P. D. 2005. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. International Journal of Climatology 25, 693- 712.
    • Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N. and Petroliagis, T., 1996. The new ECMWF ensemble prediction system: methodology and validation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122, 73-119.
    • Nakic´enovic´, N. and Swart, R. (eds.) 2000. Emissions Scenarios. A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 599.
    • New, M. and Hulme, M. 2000. Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios: a Monte Carlo approach. Integr. Assess. 1, 203- 213.
    • Ra¨isa¨nen, J. 2001. CO2-induced climate change in CMIP2 experiments. Quantification of agreement and role of internal variability. J. Climate 14, 2088-2104.
    • Ra¨isa¨nen, J. and Palmer, T. N. 2001. A probability and decision model analysis of a multimodel ensemble of climate change simulations. J. Climate 14, 3212-3226.
    • Ra¨isa¨nen, J. and Alexandersson, H. 2003. A probabilistic view on resent and near future climate change in Sweden. Tellus 55A, 113-125.
    • Ra¨isa¨nen, J. and Ruokolainen, L. 2006. Probabilistic forecasts of nearterm climate change based on a resampling ensemble technique. Tellus 58A, 461-472.
    • Scaife, A., Knight, J. R., Vallis, G. K. and Folland, C. K. 2005. A stratospheric influence on the winter NAO and North Atlantic surface climate. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L18715.
    • Stanski, H. R., Wilson, L. J. and Burrows, W. R. 1989. Survey of common verification methods in meteorology. Research report 89-5, Atmospheric Environment Service Forecast Research Division, Canada.
    • Tebaldi, C., Smith, R., Nychka, D. and Mearns, L. O. 2005. Quantifying uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: a Bayesian Approach. J. Climate 18, 1524-1540.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from