LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Blossing, Ulf; Ertesvåg, Sigrun K. (2011)
Publisher: Education Inquiry
Journal: Education Inquiry
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: school improvement, community of practice, individual learning belief, social learning perspective, implementation
Why do some schools fail to improve even after taking knowledge-based improvement initiatives? In this article, we argue that some schools do not improve because their staff members have an individual learning belief. An individual learning approach to school improvement will disrupt development processes. Whereas, as we argue, a social learning understanding of school improvement based on the theory of Community of Practice and its application may provide schools with a theoretical understanding which enables successful implementation. The results of two major improvement projects in Norway illustrate how some schools fail to successfully implement improvement due to the voluntary nature of participation, the lack of situated activities in relation to the improvement objective, the low frequency of meetings and the absence of systematic leadership. Our advice to schools is to revisit their beliefs about and understanding of learning so they can manage change among staff and carefully monitor the situations we highlight as being critical to success.Keywords: school improvement, community of practice, individual learning belief, social learning perspective, implementation(Published: 1 March 2011)Citation: Education Inquiry Vol. 2, No. 1, March 2011, pp.153–171
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Blossing, U. (2000) Praktiserad skolförbättring. Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies 2000:23.
    • Blossing, U., & Ekholm, M. (2008) A Central School Reform Program in Sweden and the Local Response: Taking the Long Term View Works. Urban Education, 43(6).
    • Blossing, U., Hagen, A., Nyen, T., & Söderström, Å. (2010) Evaluering av kunskapsløftet - fra ord till handling. Slutrapport. Oslo: Fafo.
    • Borko, H., Mayfield, V., Marion, S., Flexer, R., & Cumbo, K. (1997) Teachers' developing ideas and practices about methematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(3), 259-278.
    • Cox, A. (2005) What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527-540.
    • Handal, G., Vaage, S., & Carlgren, I. (1994) Teachers' minds and actions: research on teachers' thinking and practice. London: Falmer.
    • Datnow, A. (2005) The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational AdministrationaQuarterly, 41(1), 121-153.
    • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008) Implementation matters: A review of research on the inlfuence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 327-350.
    • Ertesvåg, S. K. (2009) Classroom leadership - The effect of a school development programme. Educational Psychology, 29(5), 515-539.
    • Ertesvåg, S.K. (2011) Measuring authoritative teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27,51- 61.
    • Ertesvåg, S. K., Roland, P., Vaaland, G. S., Størksen, S., & Veland, J. (2010) The challenge of continuation. Schools' continuation of the Respect program. Journal ofEeducationalCchange, 11(4), 323-344.
    • Ertesvåg, S. K., & Vaaland, G. S. (2007) Prevention and Reduction of Behavioural Problems in School: An Evaluation of the Respect-program. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 713-736.
    • Fullan, M. (2007) The New Meaning of Educational Change (4th ed.). New York Routledge. Teacher College Press.
    • Hargreaves, A. Eds.). (2003) Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York: Teachers' College Press and Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Harris, A. (2001) Building capacity for school improvement. School Leadership and Management, 21(3), 261-270.
    • Hatch, T. (2007) Building capacity for school improvement. In R. Bacchetti & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Reconnecting education & foundations: Turning good intentions into educational capital. (pp. 165-183). Hoboken, NJ US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    • Holmqvist, M. (2006) Lärande i skolan: learning study som skolutvecklingsmodell. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    • Hopkins, D. (2001) School improvement for real. London: Routledge Falmer.
    • Illeris, K. (2007) How we learn: learning and non-learning in school and beyond. London: Routledge.
    • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
    • Lauvås, P., & Handal, G. (2001) Handledning och praktisk yrkesteori. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    • Lauvås, P., Hofgaard Lycke, K., & Handal, G. (1997) Kollegahandledning i skolan. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambrigde University Press.
    • Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (2006) Transformational school leadership for large scale reform. The effects nm students, teachesn, and the classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
    • Little, J. W. (2002) Professional Community and the Problem of High School Reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 693-714.
    • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997) Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates, publishers.
    • Midthassel, U. V., & Bru, E. (2001) Predictors and gains of teacher involvement in an improvement project on classroom management. Experiences from a Norwegian project in two compulsory schools. Educational Psychology, 21(3), 229-242.
    • Miles, M. B., & Seashore Louis, K. (1987) Research on institutionalization: a reflective review. In M. B. Miles, M. Ekholm & R. Vandenberghe (Eds.), Lasting School Improvement: Exploring the Process of Institutionalization (Vol. 5, pp. 25-44). Leuven/Amersfoort: Acco.
    • Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization. Newbury Park, London, NeliDelhi: SAGE Publications.
    • Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2008) Collaborative assistance in a highly prescribed school reform model: The case of success for all. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 400-422.
    • Reddy, M. (1979) “The Conduit Metaphor.” In A. Ortony, (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, Eng.; At the University Press.
    • Reynolds, D. (2009) Smart School Improvement: Towards School Learning from Their Best. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins(eEds.), Second International Handbook on Educational Change (pp. 595-610). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Sim, J. (1998) Collecting and analysing qualitative data: Issues raised by the focus group. Methodologica Iissues i Nnursin Rresearch, 28(2), 345-352.
    • Skolverket. (2009) Vad påverkar resultaten i svensk grundskola: kunskapsöversikt om betydelsen av olika faktorer. [What affects the results in Swedish compulsory school?] Stockholm: Skolverket.
    • Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2007) Schools as team-based organizations: A structure-process-outcomes approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(4), 305-320.
    • Stoll, L. (2009) Capacity Building for School Improvement or Creating Capacity for Learning? A Changing Landscape. Journal o Eeducationa Cchange, 10, 115-127.
    • Stringer, P. M. (2009) Capacity Building for School Improvement: A Case Study of a New Zealand Primary School. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 8(3), 153-179.
    • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962/1969) Thought an Language. Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from