LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pozniak, Eugene; Woodrow, Ryan; Flemming, Philippa (2013)
Publisher: Journal of European CME
Journal: Journal of European CME
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: CME, proceedings, Europe, 2012, CPD
One hundred and thirty speakers and delegates met in London for the fifth annual meeting of the European CME Forum which took place on 15 and 16 November 2012. Over the two days, current and future trends in European Continuing Medical Education (CME) were examined, discussed and debated. The meeting employed a mixture of styles: plenary presentations, workshops and panel discussion, but with a high focus on open question-and-answer interaction between speakers and delegates. The predominant target audience comprised people with an interest in European CME including the accreditation bodies, scientific societies, education providers, medical communications agencies and industry supporters. Each interest group had a dedicated meeting on the day before the formal programme; European pharmaceutical company involvement, scientific societies and the Good CME Practice Group which announced that following the publication of its recent work, it was opening its membership to all qualifying providers. A pre-meeting needs assessment was carried out which informed the programme structure and led to a more interactive format. Session themes included the new European Accreditation Council for CME (EACCME) accreditation criteria, e-learning, panel discussions with experts from throughout Europe as well as CME professionals from the USA, Canada, India and Australia.Keywords: CME, proceedings, Europe, 2012, CPD(Published: 22 July 2013)DOI: 10.3109/21614083.2013.812965
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Th e European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Th e accreditation of live educational events by the EACCME [Internet]. Available at: http://www.uems.net/uploads/media/UEMS_2012.30_-_ Accreditation_of_Live_Educational_Events_by_EACCME_-__ ADOPTED_01.pdf.
    • 2. Farrow S, Gillgrass D, Pearlstone A, Torr J, Pozniak E; Good CME Practice Group. Setting CME standards in Europe: guiding principles for medical education. Curr Med Res Opin 2012;28:1861-1871. Available at: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/full/10.1185/03007 995.2012.738191.
    • 3. Ramsden P. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2003.
    • 4. Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student does (Society for Research into Higher Education). 4th ed. London: Open University Press; 2011.
    • 5. Biggs J. Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education 1979;8:381-394.
    • 6. Hattie J. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge; 2008.
    • 7. Regnier K, Kopelow M, Lane D, Alden E. Accreditation for learning and change: quality and improvement as the outcome. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2005;25:174-182.
    • 8. Rasmussen BK. Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia 2001;21: 774-777.
    • 9. Mennini FS, Gitto L, Martelletti P. Improving care through health economics analyses: cost of illness and headache. J Headache Pain 2008;9:199-206.
    • 10. Scriven M. Th e Methodology of Evaluation. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Co; 1967. pp. 39-83.
    • 11. Moore DE Jr, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2009; 29:1-15.
    • 12. Fox RD, Miner C. Motivation and the facilitation of change, learning, and participation in educational programs for health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1999;19:132-141.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from