Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Caldwell, Jon G. (2008)
Publisher: Medical Education Online
Journal: Medical Education Online
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Research Article, Education, Internship and Residency, Physician-Patient Relations, Medical Residency, Patient Participation/methods, Training, Physician's Role/psychology, Physicians, Decision Making, Interviews/methods, Communication, Patient Participation/psychology, Internship
Objective - Shared decision making (SDM) is recognized as an ideal model of patient-physician interaction, yet clinical application occurs infrequently. The current study evaluated attitudes of first-year residents to identify potential barriers and opportunities regarding SDM. Methods - A total of 70 residents attending orientation at the University of Utah completed a questionnaire that elicited their understanding of SDM, perceptions about the importance of SDM, confidence in utilizing SDM, and reasons for lacking confidence. Results - Most residents reported no prior SDM education (N=42, 60%) or training (N=46, 66%), yet 67 (96%) of them could recognize it in a clinical vignette. Using a Likert scale, the majority of residents (91% to 99%) attributed importance to SDM principles, and most (79% to 90%) indicated confidence in applying them. Lack of training was reported as a barrier by 40 (57%) residents. Conclusions - A minority of residents reported formal education or training in SDM, yet the vast majority recognized and valued the model. A large percentage of residents expressed confidence in their abilities to incorporate SDM into patient care, but many also identified a need for more education and training. Keyword: Decision Making, Interviews/methods, Patient Participation/methods, Physician-Patient Relations, Patient Participation/psychology, Physician’s Role/psychology, Communication, Physi­cians, Education, Training, Internship and Residency, Internship, Medical Residency
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam C, Freeman TR. Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1995.
    • Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 267(16):2221- 6.
    • Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 2(2):112-21.
    • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decisionmaking in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681-92.
    • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):651-61.
    • Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ. 1999;318(7179):318-22.
    • Cruz M, Pincus HA. Research on the influence that communication in psychiatric encounters has on treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53(10):1253-65.
    • Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 282(24):2313-20.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article