LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Richard Tucker; Gayle Morris (2012)
Publisher: Association for Learning Technology
Journal: Research in Learning Technology
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Education, flexible learning, flexible learning; flexible delivery, L, flexible delivery

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
The term ‘flexible education’ is now firmly entrenched within Australian higher education discourse, yet the term is a contested one imbued with a multiplicity of meanings. This paper describes a process designed to elucidate how the idea of flexible education can be translated into teaching models that are informed by the specific demands of disciplinary contexts. The process uses a flexible learning ‘matching’ tool to articulate the understandings and preferences of students and academics of the Built Environment to bridge the gap between student expectations of flexibility and their teacher’s willingness and ability to provide that flexibility within the limits of the pedagogical context and teaching resources. The findings suggest an informed starting point for educators in the Built Environment and other creative disciplines from which to traverse the complexities inherent in negotiating flexibility in an increasingly digital world.Keywords: flexible learning; flexible delivery(Published: 3 February 2012)Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2012, 20: 14404 - DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14404
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bigum, C. & Rowan, L. (2004) 'Flexible learning in teacher education: Myths, muddles and models'', Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 213 226.
    • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H. & Scales, B. (2008) Review of Australian higher education final report. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
    • Casey, J. & Wilson, P. (2005) A practical guide to providing flexible learning in further and higher education. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Scotland, Glasgow. Available online at: http//www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/flexibleDelivery/FD_Flexible_ Learning_JCaseyFINALWEB.pdf [accessed 15 November 2010].
    • Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2004) Flexible learning in a digital world, 2nd edn, Routledge and Falmer, London.
    • Collis, B., Vingerhoets, J. & Moonen, J. (1997) 'Flexibility as a key construct in european training: experiences from the telescopia project', British Journal of Educational Technology, vol 28 no. 3, pp. 199 217.
    • De Boer, D. & Collis, B. (2005) 'Becoming more systematic about flexible learning: Beyond time and distance', ALT-J', Research in Learning Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33 48.
    • Dobozy, E. (2008) 'Plan your study around your life, not the other way around: How are semiengaged students coping with flexible access?' Paper presented at the EDU-COM conference, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
    • Errington, E. (2004) 'The impact of teacher beliefs on flexible learning innovation: some practices and possibilities for academic developers' Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 411, no. 1, pp. 39 47.
    • Jones, S. & Richardson, J. (2002) 'Designing an IT-augmented student-centred learning environment', Paper presentat at the HERDSA Conference, Perth, Australia.
    • Kennedy, G. et al. (2008) 'First year students' experiences with technology: are they really digital natives?', Educational Technology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 108 122.
    • Kirkpatrick, D. (1997) 'Becoming flexible: contested territory', Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 160 173.
    • Ling, P., et al. (2001) The effectiveness of models of flexible provision of higher education 01/9, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra. Available online at: http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/profiles/archives/ models_of_flexible_provision_higher_education.htm [accessed 15 November 2010].
    • McShane, K., Peat, M. & Masters, A. F. (2007) 'Playing it safe? Students' study preferences in a flexible chemistry module', Australian. Journal. of Education. in Chemistry, no. 67: 24 30.
    • Morrison, L. & Pitfield, M. (2006) 'Flexibility in initial teacher education: implications for pedagogy and practice'', Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 185 196.
    • Nicoll, K. (1998) '"Fixing" The "Facts": flexible learning as policy invention', Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 291 304.
    • Nicoll, K. & Chappell, C. (1998) 'Policy effects: "Flexible learning" In higher education and the "De-differentiation" Of the vocational sector', Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 39 50.
    • Nikolova, I. & Collis, B. (1998) 'Flexible learning and design of instruction', British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 59 72.
    • Normand, C. & Littlejohn, A. (2006) Enhancing practice flexible delivery a model for analysis and implementation of flexible programme delivery, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, Gloucester. Available online at: www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/ documents/flexibleDelivery/flexible_delivery_QAA_124.pdf [accessed 15 November 2010].
    • Normand, C., Littlejohn, A. & Falconer, I. (2008) 'A model for effective implementation of flexible programme delivery'', Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 25 36.
    • Nunan, T. (1996) 'Flexible delivery what is it and why is it a part of current educational debate? ', In Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Annual Conference, Perth, pp. 595 600.
    • Palmer, S. (2001) 'Engineering flexible teaching and learning in engineering education', European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1 13.
    • Pillay, H., Irving, K. & Tones, M. (2007) 'Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing" Tertiary students', Higer Education Research and Development, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 217 34.
    • Poindexter, S. (2003) 'The case for holistic learning', Change, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 24 31.
    • Roberts, T. S. (2002) 'Flexible learning: how can we get there from here?', ASCILITE 2002, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 8 11, December 2002.
    • Samarawickrema, G. R. (2005) 'Determinants of student readiness for flexible learning: some preliminary findings', Distance Education, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49 66.
    • Sappey, J. (2005) 'The commodification of higher education: flexible delivery and its implications for the academic labour process', in Reworking Work-AIRAANZ 19th Conference, eds M. Baird, R. Cooper & M. Westcott, The Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand, Sydney, pp. 495 502.
    • Shaffer, D. (2004) 'Pedagogical praxis: the professions as models for post-industrial education', Teachers College Record, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 1401 1421.
    • Tucker, R. & Morris, G. (2011) 'Anytime, anywhere, anyplace: articulating the meaning of flexible delivery in built environment education, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 41, pp. 904 915.
    • U.S. Department of Education. (2009) Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning:a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Available online at: http// www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html [accessed 15 November 2010].
    • Van Den Brande, L. (1993) Flexible and distance learning, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article