Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bengtsson, L.; Hodges, K. I.; Hagemann, S. (2004)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Reanalysis data obtained from data assimilation are increasingly used for diagnostic studies of the general circulation of the atmosphere, for the validation of modelling experiments and for estimating energy and water fluxes between the Earth surface and the atmosphere. Because fluxes are not specifically observed, but determined by the data assimilation system, they are not only influenced by the utilized observations but also by model physics and dynamics and by the assimilation method. In order to better understand the relative importance of humidity observations for the determination of the hydrological cycle, in this paper we describe an assimilation experiment using the ERA40 reanalysis system where all humidity data have been excluded from the observational data base. The surprising result is that the model, driven by the time evolution of wind, temperature and surface pressure, is able to almost completely reconstitute the large-scale hydrological cycle of the control assimilation without the use of any humidity data. In addition, analysis of the individual weather systems in the extratropics and tropics using an objective feature tracking analysis indicates that the humidity data have very little impact on these systems. We include a discussion of these results and possible consequences for the way moisture information is assimilated, as well as the potential consequences for the design of observing systems for climate monitoring. It is further suggested, with support from a simple assimilation study with another model, that model physics and dynamics play a decisive role for the hydrological cycle, stressing the need to better understand these aspects of model parametrization.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adler, R. F., Kidd, C., Petty, G., Morrissey, M. and Goodman, H. M. 2001. Intercomparison of global precipitation products: the third precipitation intercomparison Project (PIP-3). Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 82, 1377-1396.
    • Bengtsson, L. and Shukla, J. 1988. Integration of space and in situ observations to study global climate change. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 69, 1130-1143..
    • Charney, J., Halem, M. and Jastrow, R. 1969. Use of incomplete historical data to infer the present state of the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 1160-1163..
    • Gibson, J. K., Ka˚llberg, P., Uppala, S., Hernandez, A., Nomura, A. and Serrano, E. 1997. Era description. In: ECMWF Reanalysis Project Report Series 1. ECMWF, Reading, UK..
    • Hodges, K. I., Hoskins, B. J., Boyle, J. and Thorncroft, C. 2003. A comparison between recent re-analysis data sets using objective feature tracking: storm tracks and tropical easterly waves. Mon. Wea. Rev. 131, 2012-2037.
    • Ho´lm, E., Andersson, E., Beljaars, A., Lopez, P., Mahfouf, J.-F., Simmons, A. and The´paut, J.-N. 2002. Assimilation and Modelling of the Hydrological Cycle: ECMWF's Status and Plans, ECMWF Technical Report 383. ECMWF, Reading, UK.
    • Hoskins, B. J. and Hodges, K. I. 2002. New perspectives on the Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks. J. Atmos. Sci. 59, 1041-1061.
    • Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Arkin, A., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Gruber, A., Janowiak, J., Joyce, R. J., McNab, A., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U. and Xie, P. 1997. The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation data set. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 78, 5-20.
    • Jeuken, A. B. M., Siegmund, P. C., Heijboer, L., Feichter, J. and Bengtsson, L. 1996. On the potential of assimilating meteorological analyses into a global climate model for the purpose of model validation. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 16939-16950.
    • Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R. and Jenne, R. 1996. The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 77, 437-471.
    • Kamineni, R., Krishnamurti, T. N., Ferrare, R. A., Ismail, S. and Browell, E. V. 2003. Impact of high-resolution water vapour cross-sectional data on hurricane forecasting. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1234.
    • Kiehl, J. T. and Trenberth, K. E. 1997. Earth's annual global mean energy budget. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 78, 197-208.
    • Kistler, R., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Kalnay, E., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Kanamitsu, M., Kousky, V., van den Dool, H. and Fiorino, M. 2001. The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means cd-rom and documentation. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 82, 247-268.
    • Roads, J. 2002. Closing the water cycle. GEWEX Newsletter 12, (1). International GEWEX Project Office, MA, USA, 8 pp.
    • Roeckner, E., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L., Christoph, M., Claussen, M., Du¨menil, L., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Schlese, U. and Schulzweida, U. 1996. The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: model description and simulation of present-day climate, Rep. 218, MaxPlanck-Inst. for Meteorol., Hamburg, Germany.
    • Rudolf, B., Hauschild, H., Ru¨th, W. and Schneider, U. 1996. Comparison of rain gauge analyses, satellite-based precipitation estimates and forecast model results. Adv. Space. Res. 7, 53-62.
    • Rudolf, B., Gruber, A., Adler, R., Huffman, G., Janowiak, J. and Xie, P. 2000, GPCP precipitation analyses based on observations as a basis of NWP and climate model verification. In: Procedings of the 2nd WCRP International Conference on Reanalyses, Reading, UK, 23-27 August 1999, WCRP-109, WMO/TD-No. 985, 197- 200.
    • Simmons, A. J. and Gibson, J. K. 2000. The ERA40 Project Plan, ERA40 Project Report Series No. 1. ECMWF, Reading, UK, 63 pp.
    • Thorncroft, C. and Hodges, K. I. 2001. African easterly wave variability and its relationship to atlantic tropical cyclone activity. J. Climate 14, 1166-1179.
    • Trenberth, K. E. and Guillemot, C. J. 1998. Evaluation of the atmospheric moisture and hydrological cycle in the NCEP/NCAR reanalyses. Climate Dyn. 14, 213-231.
    • Trenberth, K. E., Stepaniak, D. P., Hurrell, J. W. and Fiorino, M. 2001. Quality of reanalyses in the tropics. J. Climate 14, 1499-1510 Xie, P. and Arkin, P. 1997. Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates and numerical model outputs. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 78, 2539-2558
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from