LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kabengele Mpinga, Emmanuel; Macias, Aurélie; Hasselgard-Rowe, Jennifer; Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin; Félicien, Tshimungu Kandolo; Verloo, Henk; Zacharie Bukonda, Ngoyi K.; Chastonay, Philippe (2016)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: socioeconomic consequences, Review Article, Africa, female genital mutilation; systematic review; Africa; medical and psychological consequences; prevalence and ethics; socioeconomic consequences, female genital mutilation, systematic review, Medicine and Society, L100, RA1-1270, prevalence and ethics, Public Health, Global Health, Gender Studies, Public aspects of medicine, medical and psychological consequences, L400, B900
ddc: ddc:613
Background: Global efforts to end female genital mutilation (FGM) have intensified in recent decades because of the rising awareness that such a practice is an act of extreme violence against women and girls. Articles on FGM have been published highlighting the combined efforts of international and non-governmental organizations, governments, as well as religious and civil society groups to end the practice. However, the consequences of this research are not well known, and it seems that the socioeconomic aspects of the practice are underreported.Objective: This review aims to characterize over a 40-year period the scientific output on the consequences of FGM in African countries, the most affected region known for the high prevalence of FGM, and review data on the socioeconomic consequences of the practice.Design: A systematic review of literature was done, looking at the following databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, BDSP, Web of Science, PsycINFO, FRANCIS, Sociological Abstracts, WHOLIS, RERO, and SAPHIR. The analysis was limited to articles concerning the African continent, published in English and French, from January 1, 1972, to December 31, 2011.Results: One hundred ninety-eight articles were reviewed. More than half of the articles were published during the last decade of the study period. The majority of papers were published in biomedical journals (64.1%). Most studies looked at Africa as a region (33.3%). Nigeria was the single country most investigated (19.2%), followed by Egypt (10.6%). Most first authors were affiliated to non-African countries (60.6%): among them 21.2% were US-based, 4% were from African institutions, and 16.2% from Nigeria.The medical and psychological consequences (51.5%) and the prevalence and ethics of the practice (34.4%) were the most frequently investigated topics. The socioeconomic consequences were addressed in a minority of the papers (14.1%): they were classified into direct economic consequences (2.5%), school attendance (1%), marriageability (2%), sexual and marital consequences (3.5%), fertility (2.5%), domestic violence (1%), and discrimination (1.5%).Conclusions: The publication of articles on the consequences of FGM is increasing, but there is little research on the socioeconomic consequences of the practice. More scientific data focusing on this dimension is necessary to strengthen prevention, advocacy, and intervention campaigns.Keywords: female genital mutilation; systematic review; Africa; medical and psychological consequences; prevalence and ethics; socioeconomic consequences(Published: 4 October 2016)Citation: Glob Health Action 2016, 9: 31489 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.31489
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. UNICEF (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York: UNICEF.
    • 2. United Nations Human Rights. Declaration on the elimination of violence against women. Available from: http://www.ohchr. org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/ViolenceAgainstWomen.aspx [cited 6 May 2015].
    • 3. World Health Organization. Sexual and reproductive health. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/about_ us/en/ [cited 6 May 2014].
    • 4. Ras-Work B. Legislation to address the issue of female genital mutilation. United Nations Women Watch; 2009. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/vaw_legislation_2009/ Expert Paper EGMGPLHP _Berhane Ras-Work revised_.pdf [cited 7 May 2015].
    • 5. Muthumbi J, Svanemyr J, Scolaro E, Temmerman M, Say L. Female genital mutilation: a literature review of the current status of legislation and policies in 27 African countries and Yemen. Afr J Reprod Health 2015; 19: 32 40.
    • 6. ACHPR. Protocol to the African charter on human and people's rights on the rights of women in Africa. African Commission on Human and People's Rights; 2003. Available from: http://www. achpr.org/instruments/women-protocol/ratification/ [cited 7 May 2015].
    • 7. OHCHR. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women 1979. Available from: http://www. ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cedaw.pdf [cited 15 July 2016].
    • 8. World Health Organization. Media Centre fact sheet N8214 [updated February 2016]. Available from: www.who.int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ [cited 4 May 2015].
    • 9. European Parliament. European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2009 on combating female genital mutilation in the EU (2008/2071(IN) [updated December 2009]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef -//EP// TEXT TA P6-TA-2009-0161 0 DOC XML V0//EN [cited 4 May 2015].
    • 10. European Parliament. European Parliament resolution of 14 June 2012 on ending female genital mutilation (2012/2684(RSP)) [updated September 2013]. Available from: http://www.europarl. europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type TA&reference P7-TA-2012- 0261&format XML&language EN [cited 4 May 2015].
    • 11. UN Women News. United Nations bans female genital mutilation. 2012. Available from: http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/ 2012/12/united-nations-bans-female-genital-mutilation [cited 4 May 2015].
    • 12. United Nations Population Fund. Joint programme on female genital mutilation/cutting 2007. Available from: http://www.unfpa. org/joint-programme-female-genital-mutilationcutting [cited 4 May 2015].
    • 13. Ending female genital mutilation to promote the achievement of the millennium development goals. End FGM European Campaign, Amnesty International. Available from: http://www. endfgm.eu/en/news-and-events/news/press-releases/eu-positionon-millennium-development-goals-should-address-human-rightsviolations-0033/ [cited 4 May 2015].
    • 14. United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development 2015. Available from: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/ PDF/N1529189.pdf ?OpenElement [cited 15 July 2016].
    • 15. Girls Not Brides. Collaboration strategy on traditional practices. 2013. Available from: http://www.girlsnotbrides.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/03/Collaboration-Strategy-on-Trad-Practices-ENG. pdf [cited 7 May 2014].
    • 16. UN-WHO. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP): highlights of 2015. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ reports/highlights2015/en/ [cited July 15, 2016].
    • 17. Bishai D, Bonnenfant YT, Darwish M, Adam T, Bathija H, Johansen E, et al. Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 281 8.
    • 18. Ekenze SO, Mbadiwe OM, Ezegwui HU. Lower genital tract lesions requiring surgical intervention in girls: perspective from a developing country. J Paediatr Child Health 2009; 45: 610 13.
    • 19. Ekenze SO, Ezegwui HU, Adiri CO. Genital lesions complicating female genital cutting in infancy: a hospital-based study in south-east Nigeria. Ann Trop Paediatr 2007; 27: 285 90.
    • 20. Dirie MA, Lindmark G. A hospital study of the complications of female circumcision. Trop Doct 1991; 21: 146 8.
    • 21. Mawad NM, Hassanein OM. Female circumcision: three years' experience of common complications in patients treated in Khartoum teaching hospitals. J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 14: 40 3.
    • 22. Izett S, Nahid T. Female genital mutilation: an overview. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
    • 23. Kabira WM, Gachukia EW, Matiangi FO. The effect of women's role on health: the paradox. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 58: 23 34.
    • 24. Van RR, Gage AJ. The effects of female genital mutilation on the onset of sexual activity and marriage in Guinea. Arch Sex Behav 2009; 38: 178 85.
    • 25. Elnashar A, Abdelhady R. The impact of female genital cutting on health of newly married women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 97: 238 44.
    • 26. Fahmy A, El-Mouelhy MT, Ragab AR. Female genital mutilation/cutting and issues of sexuality in Egypt. Reprod Health Matters 2010; 18: 181 90.
    • 27. Elnashar AM, El-Dien Ibrahim M, El-Desoky MM, Ali OM, El-Sayd Mohamed Hassan M. Female sexual dysfunction in Lower Egypt. BJOG 2007; 114: 201 6.
    • 28. Okonofua FE, Larsen U, Oronsaye F, Snow RC, Slanger TE. The association between female genital cutting and correlates of sexual and gynaecological morbidity in Edo State, Nigeria. BJOG 2002; 109: 1089 96.
    • 29. Dibieamaka NS, Iwesim OA. Female genital mutilation: implications for female sexuality. Womens Stud Int Forum 2003; 26: 575 80.
    • 30. El-Defrawi MH, Lotfy G, Dandash KF, Refaat AH, Eyada M. Female genital mutilation and its psychosexual impact. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27: 465 73.
    • 31. Martin JF, Williams RC. Female genital cutting and mother's age at birth are associated with the sex of offspring in Africa. Biodemography Soc Biol 2008; 54: 141 51.
    • 32. Nour NM. Female genital cutting: a persisting practice. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2008; 1: 135 9.
    • 33. Yount KM, Carrera JS. Female genital cutting and reproductive experience in Minya. Egypt Med Anthropol Q 2006; 20: 182 211.
    • 34. Larsen U. The effects of type of female circumcision on infertility and fertility in Sudan. J Biosoc Sci 2002; 34: 363 77.
    • 35. Larsen U, Yan S. Does female circumcision affect infertility and fertility? A study of the central African Republic, Cote d'Ivoire, and Tanzania. Demography 2000; 37: 313 321.
    • 36. Afifi M, Von BM. Egyptian women's attitudes and beliefs about female genital cutting and its association with childhood maltreatment. Nurs Health Sci 2009; 9: 270 6.
    • 37. Refaat A, Dandash KF, El-Defrawi MH, Eyada M. Female genital mutilation and domestic violence among Egyptian women. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27: 593 8.
    • 38. Shell-Duncan B, Wander K, Hernlund Y, Moreau A. Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: testing predictions of social convention theory. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73: 1275 83.
    • 39. Ekwueme OC, Ezegwui HU, Ezeoke U. Dispelling the myths and beliefs toward female genital cutting of woman: assessing general outpatient services at a tertiary health institution in Enugu state, Nigeria. East Afr J Public Health 2010; 7: 64 7.
    • 40. Wall A. Female circumcision in Nigeria Simply unethical? Health Care Anal 1998; 6: 31 3.
    • 41. Wadesango N, Rembe S, Chabaya O. Violation of women's rights by harmful traditional practices. Anthropologist 2011; 13: 121 9.
    • 42. Chesnokova T, Vaithianathan R. The economics of female genital cutting. B.E J Econ Anal Pol 2010; 10: 64-1 64-28
    • 43. Yount KM. Like mother, like daughter? Female genital cutting in Minia, Egypt. J Health Soc Behav 2002; 43: 336 58.
    • 44. Van der Kwaak A. Female circumcision and gender identity: a questionable alliance? Soc Sci Med 1992; 35: 777 87.
    • 45. United Nations. International day of zero tolerance for female genital mutilation. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/events/ femalegenitalmutilationday/ [cited 29 April 2015].
    • 46. Tijssen RJW. Africa's contribution to the worldwide research literature: Nnew analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics 2007; 71: 303 27.
    • 47. Population Reference Bureau. Women and girls at risk of female genital mutilation/cutting in the United States. Available from: http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2015/us-fgmc.aspx [cited 29 April 2015].
    • 48. African Women's Health Center. Female genital cutting research. Brigham and Women's Hospital [updated August 2014]. Available from: http://www.brighamandwomens.org/Departments_ and_Services/obgyn/services/africanwomenscenter/research.aspx [cited 29 April 2015].
    • 49. Kra´sa K. Human rights for women: the ethical and legal discussion about female genital mutilation in Germany in comparison with other Western European countries. Med Health Care Philos 2010; 13: 269 78.
    • 50. Magoha GA, Magoha OB. Current global status of female genital mutilation: a review. East Afr Med J 2000; 77: 268 72.
    • 51. UNICEF Data. Female genital mutilation/cutting country profiles: Yemen; 2013. Available from: http://data.unicef.org/corecode/ uploads/document6/uploaded_country_profiles/corecode/222/ Countries/FGMC_YEM.pdf [cited 29 April 2015].
    • 52. UNICEF Data. Child protection: female genital mutilation and cutting: access the data [updated October 2014]. Available from: http://data.unicef.org/child-protection/fgmc [cited 6 May 2015].
    • 53. UNICEF (2005). Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical exploration. New York: UNICEF.
    • 4. BDSP (''Mutilation sexuelle'' OU Excision OU Infibulation OU ''Ablation clitoris'' OU ''Circoncision fe´ minine'' OU Clitorectomie OU Excision OU ''Mutilation ge´ nitale fe´ minine'' OU MGF) ET (Afrique OU africain OU africaine OU africains OU africaines OU Angola OU Be´ nin OU Botswana OU Burkina Faso OU Burundi OU Cameroun OU Canaries OU Cap Vert OU Centrafrique OU Comores OU Congo OU ''C oˆte d'Ivoire'' OU Djibouti OU Egypte OU Erythr e´e OU Ethiopie OU Gabon OU Gambie OU Ghana OU Guine´ e OU Ile Maurice OU Kenya OU Lesotho OU Libe´ ria OU Madagascar OU Maghreb OU Malawi OU Mali OU Maurice OU Mozambique OU Namibie OU Niger OU Nigeria OU ''Oce´ an Indien'' OU Ouganda OU Rwanda OU ''Sahara espagnol'' OU Se´ ne´ gal OU Seychelles OU Sierra Leone OU Somalie OU Soudan OU Swaziland OU Tanzanie OU Tchad OU Togo OU Zaı¨re OU Zambie OU Zimbabwe)
    • 5. Web of Science, (''Female Circumcisions'' OR ''Female Circumcision'' OR ''Infibulation'' OR ''Infibulations'' OR ''Clitoridectomy'' PsycINFO, FRANCIS, OR ''Clitoridectomies'' OR ''Clitorectomy'' OR ''Clitorectomies'' OR ''Female Genital Cutting'' OR ''Female Sociological abstracts Genital Mutilation'' OR ''Female Genital Mutilations'') AND (Africa* OR Algeria OR Egypt OR Libya OR Morocco OR Tunisia OR Cameroon OR ''Central African Republic'' OR Chad OR Congo OR ''Democratic Republic of the Congo'' OR ''Equatorial Guinea'' OR Gabon OR Burundi OR Djibouti OR Eritrea OR Ethiopia OR Kenya OR Rwanda OR Somalia OR Sudan OR Tanzania OR Uganda OR Angola OR Botswana OR Lesotho OR Malawi OR Mozambique OR Namibia OR ''South Africa'' OR Swaziland OR Zambia OR Zimbabwe OR Benin OR ''Burkina Faso'' OR ''Cape Verde'' OR ''Cote d'Ivoire'' OR Gambia OR Ghana OR Guinea OR ''Guinea-Bissau'' OR Liberia OR Mali OR Mauritania OR Niger OR Nigeria OR Senegal OR ''Sierra Leone'' OR Togo) Circumcision, female, Africa, African, Mutilation sexuelle, Afrique
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.