Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Turmo, Are; Elstad, Eyvind; Christophersen, Knut-Andreas (2013)
Publisher: Education Inquiry
Journal: Education Inquiry
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: capacity, leadership, teachers’ work, teachers’ experiences
Time capacity is defined here as the individual teacher’s perceived time for professional development (e.g., the capacity to develop and renew oneself as a teacher). The pressure of paperwork on the individual teacher should not be so demanding that it goes beyond the teacher’s time for professional development. The purpose of this paper is to explore factors influencing teachers’ individual time capacity at schools that report to external accountability systems. The methodology involved was a cross-sectional survey of 243 teachers from 11 schools in a Norwegian municipality. Structural equation analysis indicates that clear leadership and teacher-principal trustships influence teachers’ perceived time capacity mainly as mediated effects via social exchange. Implications for school practice and directions for future research are discussed.Keywords: capacity, leadership, teachers’ work, teachers’ experiences(Published: 1 June 2013)Citation: Education Inquiry Vol. 4, No. 2, June 2013, pp. 335–353
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper.
    • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance. New York: Free Press.
    • Blau, P. (1986). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    • Blunch, N. J. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and AMOS. London: Sage.
    • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research . London: The Guildford Press.
    • Bryk, A. S. & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools. A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    • Carnoy, M., Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability afect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24(4), 305-331.
    • Carnoy, M., Loeb, S. & Smith, T. L. (2003). The impact of accountability policies in Texas high schools. In The New Accountability. High Schools and High-Stakes Testing, Carnoy, M., Elmore R., Siskin L. S. (eds.), pp: 142-164. New York: Routledge Farmer.
    • Creemers, B. P. M. & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational efectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A. & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviours, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 18, 159-180.
    • Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Teaching and change wars: The professionalism hypothesis. In Change Wars, Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (eds.), 45-68. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
    • Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D. Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., Brown, E. Ahtaridou, E., & Kington, A. (2009). The Impact of School Leadership on Pupil Outcomes (Research Report DCSF-RR108, Final Report. Department for Children, Schools and Families & National College for School Leadership) http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/DCSF-RR108.pdf
    • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
    • Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out. Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Elstad, E. (2009). Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: School accountability in Norway. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21,173-189.
    • Elstad, E. (2010). University-based teacher education in the field of tension between the academic world and practical experience in school: A Norwegian case. European Journal of Teacher Education 33(4), 357-370.
    • Elstad E. & Turmo A. (2011). Obeying the rules or gaming the system? Delegating exam sampling to principals within a moderate accountability system. Education, Knowledge & Economy 4(4), 1-22.
    • Elstad, E., Nordtvedt, G., & Turmo, A. (2009). The Norwegian assessment system: An accountability perspective. CADMO 17(1), 89-103.
    • Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. London: RoutledgeFalmer
    • Fullan, M. (2009). Large-scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educational Change 10, 101-113.
    • Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies 29, 1-17.
    • Grøndahl, K.K. (2009). Tidsbrukutvalgetsinnstillingav 13.12.09. [The Time Use Utilisation Committee of December 13 2009] Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
    • Guskey, T. (2003). What makes professional development efective? Phi Delta Kappan 84(10), 748-750.
    • Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education 33(3), 329-352.
    • Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(2), 297-327.
    • Hargreaves, A. (2003) Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    • Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M., eds. (2009). Change wars. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
    • Harris, A. (2001). Building the Capacity for School Improvement, School Leadership & Management 21(3), 261-270.
    • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
    • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behaviour. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Hoy, W. K. & Tarter, C. J. (2011). Power principles for educational leaders: Research into practice. International Journal of Educational Management 25(2), 124-133.
    • Hunzicker, J. (2010). Characteristics of efective professional development: A checklist. http:// rt3nc.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/file/view/design+checklist.pdf (Accessed 20.08.2012)
    • Jacob, B. A. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: Evidence from school reform in Chicago. Journal of Public Economics 89(5-6), 761-796.
    • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers' work? Power and accountability in America's schools. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Jorfald, B., Nyen, T., & Seip, Å. A. (2009). Tidstyvene.En beskrivelseavlaerernesarbeidstidssituasjon. [The time thieves: A description of teachers' working situation] Fafo-report 2009:23 Oslo: Fafo.
    • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guildford Press.
    • Lazear, E.P. (2003). Teacher incentives. Swedish Economic Policy Review 10, 179-214.
    • Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Efectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 17(2), 201-227
    • Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader eficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly 44(4), 496-528.
    • Lindqvist, P. & Nordänger, U. K. (2006). Who dares to disconnect in the age of uncertainty? Teachers' recesses and 'o-fthe-clock' work. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 12, 623-637.
    • Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • McCormick, J. & Barnett, K. (2011). Teachers'attributions for stress and their relationships with burnout. International Journal of Educational Management 25(3), 278-292.
    • Ministry of Education and Research (1996) Primary and Lower Secondary Education. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
    • O'Day, J. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review 72(3), 293-330.
    • Opfer, V. D., Pedder, D. & Lavicza, Z. (2011). The inuflence of school orientation to learning on teachers' professional learning change. School Eefctiveness and School Improvement 22(2), 193-214.
    • Oterkiil, C. & Ertesvåg, S. K. (2012) Schools' readiness and capacity to improve matter. Education Inquiry 3(1), 71-92.
    • Pfefer, J. & Veiga, J. F. (1999). Putting people first for organizational success. agement Executive 13(2), 37-48.
    • Printy, S. M. Marks, H. M. & Bowers, A. J. (2009). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership 19(5), 504-532.
    • Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A. & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the diferential efects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly 44(5), 635-674.
    • Robinson, V. M. J. (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical ifndings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools 9(1), 1-26.
    • Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundamental school knowledge 15-year-olds should possess? Journal of Educational Change 8, 349-357.
    • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Miflin.
    • Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Lynch, P. & Barksdale, K. (2006). Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36(4), 837-867.
    • Skaalvik, E. M. & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-eficacy and teacher burn-out: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 1059-1069.
    • Skaalvik, E. M. & Skaalvik, S. (2011a). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education 27, 1029-1038.
    • Skaalvik, E. M. & Skaalvik, S. (2011b). Teachers' feeling of belonging, exhaustion, and job satisfaction: The role of school goal structure and value consonance. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 24, 369-385.
    • Steen Olsen, T. & Eikseth, A. G. (2010). The power of time: Teachers' working day - negotiating autonomy and control. European Educational Research Journal 9(2), 284-294.
    • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M. & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change 7(4), 221-258.
    • Stoll, L. (2009). Capacity building for school improvement or creating capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of Educational Change 10, 115-127.
    • Strøm, B., Borge, L. E., & Haugsbakken, H. (2009). Time use and organisational aspects in primary and lower secondary schools: Final report. Oslo: SØF.
    • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism: The role of professional orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly 45, 217-247.
    • Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and justicfiation: A dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology 114, 1675-1715.
    • Watterston, J. & Caldwell, B. (2011). System alignment as a key in building capacity for school transformation. Journal of Educational Administration 49(6), 637-652.
    • White Paper (1996). Report no. 37. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
    • White Paper (2003-2004). Kultur for laering. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
    • Yin, R. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Fourth Edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from