Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
We study the forecast error growth in the 100-day ECMWF data set of 10-day forecasts previously utilized by Lorenz, separating the square of the error into systematic and random components. The random error variance is approximately equally distributed among all zonal wavenumbers m corresponding to the same total wavenumber n. Therefore, we combine the random error variance for all zonal wavenumbers and study its dependence on total (2-dimensional) wavenumber rather than on zonal wavenumber. We extend the Lorenz model for global r.m.s. error growth by including the effect of errors associated with deficiencies in the forecast model, and apply this new parameterization to the error variance of 10-day ECMWF operational forecasts obtaining an excellent fit. We point out that the commonly used parameter “doubling time of small errors” is not a good measure of error growth because it has to be determined by extrapolation to small errors and it is very sensitive to the method of extrapolation. On the other hand, the error growth at finite times is a better measure because it is well defined by the data. The results of the error fit to each total wavenumber n are the basis for the main conclusions of the paper. In the northern hemisphere winter data set, the error growth rateα increases almost monotonically with wavenumber, from about 0.3 day-1 at long waves to about 0.45 day-1 at medium and short waves. The saturation error variance V∞ is about 30% larger than the error variance at day 10 for long waves, which have not yet reached saturation. The scaled source of external error S/V∞ (due to model deficiencies) varies from about 3% day-1 at long waves to about 20% day-1 at short waves. This increase of relative model error may be due to the second-order finite differences used in the ECMWF model during 1980/1981. Finally, we estimate the theoretical limit of dynamical predictability as a function of total wavenumber n. We define it as the time at which the error variance reaches 95% of the saturation value. This time decreases monotonically with n. In the winter, waves n ≪ 10 have not reached saturation at 10 days. In a perfect model with error growth similar to the present model, the predictability limit would be extended by about a week. In the summer, error growth rates and model deficiencies are larger than in winter, and the limit of predictability is close to 10 days even for long waves.DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.1987.tb00322.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Arpe, K . , Hollingsworth, A,, Tracton, M. S., Lorenc, A. C., Uppala, S. and KAllberg, P. 1985. The response of numerical weather prediction systems to FGGE level IIb data-Part 11: Forecast verification and implications for predictability.Q. J . R . Mereorol. SOC.111, 67-101.
    • Arpe, K . and Klinker, E. 1986. Systematic errors of the ECMWF operational forecasting model in mid-latitudes. Q.J . R . Meteorol. Soc.112, 181-202.
    • Bengtsson, L. 1985. Medium-Range Forecasting-The Experience of ECMWF. Bull. Am. Meteorol. SOC.66, 1133-1146.
    • Boer, G. J . 1984. A spectral analysis of the predictability and error in an operational forecast system. Mon. Weather Rev. 112, 1183-1 197.
    • Charney, J . G . , Fleagle, R. G., Riehl, H., Lally, V. E. and Wark, D. Q . 1966. The feasibility of a global observation and analysis experiment. Bull. Am. Mereorol. SOC.47, 2W220.
    • Dalcher, A,, Kalnay, E. and Hoffman, R. N . 1985. Application of the lagged average forecast method to ECMWF 10-day forecasts. Preprints from the Ninth Amer. Meteor. SOC.Conference on Probability and Statistics in Atmospheric Sciences. Virginia Beach, VA., October 1985, 13&136.
    • Hoffman, R. N . and Kalnay, E. 1983. Lagged average forecasting an alternative to Monte C ; d o forecasting, Tellus 35A. 10&118.
    • Hoffman, R. N. and Kalnay, E. 1984. Lagged average forecasting, some operational considerations. Predictability o f j u i d motions, American Inst. of Phys. Con/. Proc., G . Holloway and B. J. West, editors, 106, 141-147.
    • Kalnay, E. and Dalcher, A. 1985. Error growth in operational ECMWF Forecasts Preprints from the Seventh Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction. Montreal, P.Q.,Canada, June 1985, pp. 183-189.
    • Leith, C. E. 1978. Objective methods for weather prediction, Ann. Reo. Fluid Mech. 10, 107-128.
    • Leith, C. E. 1982. Statistical methods for the verification of long and short range forecast. European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Seminar 1981, Problems and Prospects in Long and Medium Range weather Forecasting. 14-18 September, 313-333.
    • Lorenz, E. N. 1965. A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus 17, 321-333.
    • Lorenz, E. N. 1982. Atmospheric Predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus 34, 505- 513.
    • Savijarvi, H. 1984. Spectral properties of analyzed and forecast global 500 mb fields. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 1745- 1754.
    • Shukla, J. 1981. Dynamical predictability of monthly means. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2547-2572.
    • Smagorinsky, J. 1969. Problems and promises of deterministic extended range forecasting. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 50, 286-3 1 1.
    • Wallace, J. M., Tibaldi, S. & Simmons, A. J . 1983. Reduction of systematic forecast errors in the ECMWF model through the introduction of an envelope orography. Q. J. R . Meteorol. Soc. 109, 683-717.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from