Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Olin, Elisabeth; Ringsby Jansson, Bibbi (2010)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
Languages: English
Types: Article
During the last decades, the living conditions for young people with disabilities have changed dramatically in Sweden, as well as in other parts of the Western world. The boundaries between what is considered normal as opposed to different have become less clear as a result of these changes. This has been followed by new problems regarding integration and changing patterns of marginalization. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the ways in which young adults' social identity is shaped by their dual belongings: to the category of individuals with disabilities as well as to mainstream society. In- depth interviews were carried out with 15 young adults with mental disabilities and mild intellectual disabilities occasionally combined with various forms of social problems. The analysis focused on the ways in which the young adults related to what they describe as normal and different as well as their strategies for navigating between them. The data was subsequently divided into three categories: Pragmatic Navigators, Critical Challengers, and Misunderstood Rebels, which refl ect the ways in which the respondents describe themselves and the perspective they have developed to manage their existence. Key words: Intellectual disabilities, mental disabilities, social identity, normality, stigmatization, strategies, social belonging.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allen, S. (1994). Race, ethnicity and nationality: Some questions of identity. In H. Afshar & M. Maynard (Eds.), The dynamics of race and gender: some feminist interventions (pp. 85-106). London: Taylor and Francis.
    • Barnes, C., Mercer, G., & Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Oxford: Polity Press.
    • Barron, K. (2002). Who am I? Women with learning difficulties (Re) constructing their self-identity. Scandinavian Journal of Disability research, 4(1), 58-79
    • Beck, U. (1992) Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage publication.
    • Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
    • Bradley, V. (1996) Foreword. In J. Mansell & K. Ericsson (Eds.), Deinstitutionalisation and community living. Intellectual disability service in Britain, Scandinavia and the USA (pp. x-xvii). London: Chapman & Hall.
    • Brown, H., & Smith, H. (1992) Normalisation in the nineties. London: Routledge.
    • Castell, M. (1997) The information age. Economy, society and culture.Vol II. The power of identity. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
    • Corrigan, P. W., & Mattews, A. K. (2003) Stigma and disclosure: Implications for coming out of the closet. Journal of Mental Health, 12(3), 235-248.
    • Corrigan, P, W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). The paradox of selfstigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35-53.
    • Deeley, S. (2002). Professional ideologies and learning disability: An analysis of internal conflict. Disability & Society, 17(1), 19-33.
    • Ekeland, T.-J., & Bergem, R. (2006). The negotiation of identity among people with mental illness in rural communities. Community Mental Health Journal, 42(3) 225-232.
    • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
    • Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2001). Institutional selves:Troubled identities in a post-modern world. New York: Oxford Press.
    • Hallerstedt, G. red. (2006). Diagnosens makt: Om kunskap, pengar och lidande. (The power of the diagnosis. About knowledge, money and suffering). Göteborg: Daidalos.
    • Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publication.
    • Islam, Z. (2008). Negotiating identities: The lives of Pakistani and Bangladeshi young disabled people. Disability & Society, 23(1), 41-52.
    • Madsen, B. (2006). Socialpedagogik. Integration och inklusion i det moderna samhället. (Social pedagogy. Integration and inclusion in modern society). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    • Mc Villy, K. R. (1995). Interviewing people with a learning disability about their residential service. British Journal of learning disabilities, 23(2), 138-142.
    • Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing. Context and narrative. Massachusetts: Harvard: University Press.
    • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publication.
    • Milner, P., & Kelly, B. (2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability & Society, 24(1) 47-62.
    • Molin, M. (2008). Delaktighet i olika världar-om övergången mellan gymnasiesärskola och arbetsliv. (Different worlds of participation-the transition from upper secondary special programmes to working life for pupils with intellectual disabilities). FoU Rapport, Högskolan Väst: Trollhättan.
    • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage Publications.
    • Radley, A., & Billig, M. (1996). Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations. Sociology of Health & Illness, 18(2), 226-240.
    • Rapley, M., Kiernan, P., & Antaki, C. (1998). Invisible to them selves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of being intellectually disabled. Disability & Society, 13(5), 807-827.
    • Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disability & Society, 17(5), 493-508.
    • Seale, J. (2001). The same but different: The use of the personal home page by adults with Down syndrome as a tool for selfpresentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 343-352.
    • Shakespeare, T. (1996). Disability, identity and difference. In C. Barnes, & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide: Illness and disability, (pp 94-113). Leeds: The Disability Press.
    • Sicakkan, H. G.,, & Lithman,Y. G. (2006) Introduction: Diversity and multidimensional identities. In H. G. Sicakkan & Y. G. Lithman (Eds.), What happens when a society is diverse: Exploring multidimensional identities, (pp 13-24). New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
    • Susinos, T. (2007). Tell me in your own words': Disabling barriers and social exclusion in young persons. Disability & Society, 22(2), 117-127.
    • Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New York: Wiley.
    • Winance, M. (2007). Being normally different? Changes to normalization processes: from alignment to work on the norm. Disability & Society, 22(6), 625-638.
    • World Medical Association (2000). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Edinburgh: World Medical Association.
    • Young, I. (1999). Justice and the politics of difference. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
    • Zetterqvist Nelson, K. (2000). På tal om dyslexi: en studie om hur barn, föräldrar och lärare berättar om och ger betydelse åt diagnoser som dyslexi och specifika läs och skrivsvårigheter. (Speaking of dyslexia. A study of how children, parents and teachers talk about and give meaning to diagnoses like dyslexia or specific reading and writing difficulties). Linköping: Studies in Arts and Science.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from