Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Egger, Joseph (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Current gravity wave drag schemes alter the flow field of a numerical model by changing the velocity.It is argued that this is essentially the situation considered in the theory of geostrophic adjustment.The reduction of velocity at one moment does not necessarily lead to a reduction of the global meanvelocity after adjustment in that case. It is best to discuss these processes in terms of angular momentumconservation, so that the initial loss of velocity can be seen as a reduction of the wind term which maybe converted into a reduction of the mass term. Observations are used to see if this process can bedetected in the angular momentum budget of the atmosphere. The data indeed reveal a rapid positiveresponse of the mass term to the gravity wave drag.DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0870.2003.00024.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bell, M. 1994. Oscillations in the equatorial components of the atmosphere's angular momentum and torques on the earth's bulge. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 120, 195-213.
    • Benoit, R., Scha¨r, C., Binder, P., Chamberland, S., Davies, H. C. and co-authors. 2002. The real-time ultrafine scale forecast support during the special observing period of the MAP. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 83, 88-109.
    • Blumen, W. 1972. Geostrophic adjustment. Rev. Geophys. Sp. Phys. 10, 485-528.
    • Cahn, A. 1945. An investigation of the free oscillations of a simple current system. J. Meteorol. 2, 113-119.
    • Durran, D. 1995. Do breaking mountain waves decelerate the local mean flow? J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 4010-4032.
    • Egger, J. 2001. Angular momentum of β-plane flows. J. Atmos. Sci. 58, 2502-2508.
    • Egger, J. and Hoinka, K.-P. 2002. Covariance analysis of the global atmospheric axial angular momentum budget. Mon. Wea. Rev. 130, 1063-1070.
    • Gibson, R., Ka˚llberg, P., Uppala, S., Hernandez, A., Nomura, A. and Serrano, E. 1997. ERA description. ERA Reanalysis Proj. Rep. Ser. Vol. 1, 68 pp. [Available from ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading RGZ9AX, UK].
    • Gregory, D., Shutts, G. and Mitchell, J. 1998. A new gravitywave-drag scheme incorporating anisotropic orography and low-level wave breaking: impact upon the climate of the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 124, 463-493.
    • Kim, Y.-J. and Arakawa, A. 1995. Improvement of orographic gravity wave parameterization using a mesoscale gravity wave model. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 1875-1902.
    • Klinker, E. and Sardeshmukh, P. 1992. The diagnosis of mechanical dissipation in the atmosphere from large-scale balance requirements. J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 608-627.
    • Lindzen, R. 1981. Turbulence and stress owing to gravity wave and tidal breakdown. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 9707- 9714.
    • Lott, F. and Miller, M. 1997. A new sub-grid-scale orographic drag parameterization: its formulation and testing. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 123, 101-127.
    • Miller, M., Palmer, T. and Swinbank, R. 1989. Parameterization and influence of subgrid-scale orography in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 40, 84-109.
    • Palmer, T. Shutts, G. and Swinbank, R. 1986. Allevation of a systematic westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models through an orographic gravity wave parameterization. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 112, 1001-1039.
    • Rossby, C.-G. 1937. On the neutral adjustment of pressure and velocity distributions in certain simple current systems. 1. J. Marine. Res. 1, 15-25.
    • Rossby, C.-G. 1938. On the neutral adjustment of pressure and velocity distributions in certain simple current systems. 2. J. Marine. Res. 1, 239-263.
    • Scinocca, J. and McFarlane, A. 2000. The parameterization of drag induced by stratified flow over anisotropic orography. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126, 2253-2293.
    • von Storch, H. and Zwiers, F. 1999. Statistical analysis in climate research. Cambridge University, Press, Cambridge. 484 pp.
    • Warner, C. and McIntyre, M. 2001. An ultrasimple spectral parameterization of nonorographic gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci. 58, 1837-1857.
    • Welch, W., Smolarkiewicz, P., Rotunno, R. and Boville, B. 2001. The large-scale effects of flow over periodic mesoscale topography. J. Atmos. Sci. 58, 1477-1492.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from