Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Alexandrov, G. A.; Oikawa, T.; Yamagata, Y. (2011)
Publisher: Tellus B
Journal: Tellus B
Languages: English
Types: Article
The quantitative formulation of the fertilization effect of CO2 enrichment on net primary production (NPP) introduced by Keeling and Bacastow in 1970s (known as Keeling's formula) has been recognized as a summary of experimental data and has been used in various assessments of the industrial impact on atmospheric chemistry. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the formula's key coefficient, the so-called growth factor, has remained open to question. Some of the global carbon cycle modelers avoid this question by tuning growth factor and choosing the value that fits the observed course of atmospheric CO2 changes. However, for mapping terrestrial sinks induced by the CO2 fertilization effect one needs a geographical pattern of the growth factor rather than its globally averaged value. The earlier approach to this problem involved formulating the climate dependence of the growth factor and the derivation of its global pattern from climatic variables (whose geographical distribution is known). We use a process-based model (TsuBiMo) for this purpose and derive the values of growth factor for major biomes for comparison our approach with the earlier studies. Contrary to the earlier prevailing opinion, TsuBiMo predicts that these values decrease with mean annual temperature (excluding biomes of limited water supply). We attribute this result to the effect of light limitation caused by mutual shading inside a canopy, which was considered earlier as unimportant, and conclude that current hypotheses about CO2 fertilization effect (and thus projections of the related carbon sink) are very sensitive to the choice of driving forces taken into account.DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2003.00021.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexandrov, G. A. and Oikawa, T. 1997. Contemporary variations of terrestrial net primary production: The use of satellite data in the light of an extremal principle. Ecological Modelling 95, 113-118.
    • Alexandrov, G. A. and Oikawa, T. 2002. TsuBiMo: a biosphere model of the CO2 fertilization effect. Climate Res. 19, 265-270.
    • Alexandrov, G. A., Oikawa, T. and Esser, G. 1999. Estimating terrestrial NPP: what the data say and how they may be interpreted Ecological Modelling 117, 361-369.
    • Alexandrov, G. A., Oikawa, T. and Yamagata, Y. 2002. The scheme for globalization of a process-based model explaining gradations in terrestrial NPP and its application. Ecological Modelling 148, 293-306.
    • Bacastow, R. and Keeling, C. D. 1973. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and radiocarbon in the natural carbon cycle: II. Changes from A.D. 1700-2070 as deduced from a geochemical model. In: Carbon and the biosphere (eds. G. M. Woodwell and E. V. Pecan). U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, 86- 135.
    • Box, E. O. 1988. Estimating the seasonal carbon source-sink geography of a natural, steady-state terrestrial biosphere. J. Appl. Meteorol. 27, 1109-1124.
    • Box, E. O. 1995. Global potential natural vegetation: dynamic benchmark in the era of disruption. In: Toward global planning of sustainable use of the Earth (ed. S. Murai). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 77-96.
    • Box, E. O. and Meentemeyer, V. 1991. Geographic modeling and modern ecology. In: Modern ecology: basic and applied aspects (eds. G. Esser and D. Overdieck). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 773-804.
    • Esser, G., Lieth, H. F. H., Scurlock, J. M. O and Olson, R. J. 1997. Worldwide estimates and bibliography of net primary productivity derived from pre-1982 publications, ORNL Technical Memorandum TM-13485, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
    • Farquhar, G. D. 1989. Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Philos. Tran. R. Soc. London 323B, 357-367.
    • Farquhar, G. D. and von Caemmerer, S. 1982. Modeling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In: Physiological plant ecology II. Water relations and carbon assimilation (eds. O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond and H. Ziegler), Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology New Series. 12B, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 549- 588.
    • Gifford, R. M. 1980. Carbon storage by the biosphere. In: Carbon dioxide and climate (ed. G. I. Pearman). Australian Academy of Sciences, Canberra, 167-181.
    • Kheshgi, H. S., Jain, A. K. and Wuebbles, D. J. 1996. Accounting for the missing carbon sink with the CO2 fertilization effect. Climatic Change 33, 31- 62.
    • Kelloma¨ki, S. and Wang, K. Y. 2001. Growth and Resource Use of Birch Seedlings Under Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Temperature. Ann. Bot. 87, 669-682.
    • Kimball, B. A. 1983. Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations. Agron. J. 75, 779-788.
    • Luxmore, R. J. and Baldocchi, D. D. 1995. Modeling interactions of carbon dioxide, forest and climate. In: Biotic feedbacks in the global climatic system (eds. G. M. Woodwell and F. T. Mackenzie). Oxford University Press, New York, 284-303.
    • Medlyn, B. E., Badeck, F.-W., de Pury, D. G. G., Barton, C. V. M., Broadmeadow, M., Ceulemans, R., de Angelis, P., Forstreuter, M., Jach, M. E., Kelloma¨ki, S., Laitat, E., Marek, M., Philippot, S., Rey, A., Strassemeyer, J., Laitinen, K., Liozon, R., Portier, B., Roberntz, P., Wang, K. and Jarvis, P. G. 1999. Effects of elevated [CO2] on photosynthesis in European forest species: A meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant, Cell Environ. 22, 1475-1495.
    • Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U., Schotterer, U. and Gugelmann, A. 1975. A box diffusion model to study the carbon dioxide exchange in nature. Tellus 27, 168-192.
    • Oikawa, T. 1986. A simulation study of surplus productivity as influenced by the photosynthesis and respiration rates of a single leaf, J. Agr. Meteorol. 42, 207-216.
    • Polglase, P. J. and Wang, Y. P. 1992. Potential CO2-enhanced carbon storage by the terrestrial biosphere. Aust. J. Bot. 40, 641-656.
    • Wullschleger, S. D., Post, W. M. and King, A. W. 1995. On the potential for a CO2 fertilization effect in forests: estimates of the biotic growth factor based on 58 controlled-exposure studies. In: Biotic feedbacks in the global climatic system (eds. G. M. Woodwell and F. T. Mackenzie). Oxford University Press, New York, 85-107.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from