LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Blanchard, D. C.; Woodcock, A. H. (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
It is believed that the vast majority of the airborne salt nuclei arise from bursting bubbles at the air—sea water interface. Four natural mechanisms for the production of these bubbles have been studied. These are whitecaps, rain, snow and supersaturation of the surface waters of the sea due to spring warming. The bubble spectra from whitecaps and snowflakes have been measured and semi-quantitative and qualitative observations have been made on the bubble spectrum produced by raindrops. No evidence of bubble production by spring warming has been obtained. All of the measurements show that a majority of the bubbles are < 200 microns diameter and, in the case of bubbles from snowflakes, < 50 microns. In the vicinity of a breaking wave the bubble production rate is about 30 cm−2 sec−1. Due to the effects of surface tension in increasing the bubble internal pressure all bubbles < 300 microns will go into solution even at sea water air saturations of 102 percent. Bubbles < 20 microns will go into solution at saturations up to 115 percent! The solution time for small bubbles of about 10 microns is about 10 sec and is not markedly affected by the water saturation percentage. It is concluded that the effects of the rate of solution of bubbles in sea water can, under some conditions, play a significant role in modifying the initial bubble spectrum. This, in turn, should influence the spectrum of airborne nuclei.DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01867.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ALIVERTIG, ., and G. LOVERA19,39:I fenomeni meteorologici sull'Oceano e il campo elettrico terrestre. Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 74, pp. 573-590.
    • ALLENH,. S., 1900: The motion of a sphere in a viscous fluid. Phil. Mag., 50, pp. 323-338.
    • BEST,A. C., 1950: The size distribution of raindrops. Quart. J. R o y . Met. Soc., 76, pp. 16-36.
    • BLANCHARDD., C., 1953: Raindrop size-distribution in Hawaiian rains. J. Met., 10, pp 457-473.
    • - 1955: Electrified droplets from the bursting of bubbles at an air-sea water interface. Nature, 175, pp. 334-336.
    • - 1954:Bursting of bubbles at an air-water interface. Nature 173. p. 1048.
    • BOWENE,. G., 1950:The formation of rain by coalescense. AustralianJ. of Sci. Res., 3,pp. 193-213.
    • BOYCES,. G.,1951: Source of atmospheric salts. Science, 113, pp. 620-621.
    • BYERSH,. R., 1955: Distribution in the atmosphere of certain particles capable of serving as condensation nuclei. Proc. Conf. Physics ofcloud andPrecip. Particles, Woods Hole Ocean. Inst., Woods Hole, Mass. T o be publ.
    • COSTEJ,. H., and H. L. WRIGHT19,35:The nature of the nucleus in hygroscopic droplets. Phil. Mag., 20. PP. 209-234.
    • Tellus IX (1957). 2
    • CROZIERW, . D. and B. K. SEELY1,950:Some techniques for sampling and identifying particulate matter in the air, Proceeding of First National Air Pollution Symposium, p. 45, Stanford, Calif., Stanford Press.
    • DEANR,. B., 1944: The formation of bubbles. J. A p p . Physics 15,pp. 446-451.
    • FOURNIEDR'ALBEE,. M., 1951:Sur les embruns marins. Bull. Inst. Oceanogr., Monaco, 48, No. 995. 7 pp.
    • Fox, F. E. and K. F. HERZFELD19,55:Gas bubbles with organic skins as cavitation nuclei. J. Acoust. SOC.of Amer. 26, pp. 984-989.
    • GOLDSTEINS.,, 1938: Modern developments in Puid dynamics. Vol. I, p. 14. Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
    • KIENTZLECR., F., A. B. ARONSD,. C. BLANCHARaDn,d A. H. WOODCOC1K95,4:Photographic investigation of the projection of droplets by bubbles bursting at a water surface. Tellus, 6, pp. 1-7.
    • KINZERG,. D., and R. GUNN,1951: The evaporation, temperature and thermal relaxation-time of freely falling waterdrops. J. Mef., 8, pp. 71-83.
    • KNBLMANF.., N. DOMBROWSKIa,nd D. M. NBWKTT. 1954:Mechanism of the bursting of bubbles. Nature 173, p. 261.
    • KOHLBRH,., 1941: An experimental investigation on sea water nuclei. Nova Acta reg. SOC.Sci. Upsaliensic. ser. 4. IZ, No. 6. 5 s PP.
    • LUDLAMF,. H., 1951: The production of showers by the coalescence of cloud droplets. Quart.]. Roy. Met. Soc., 77, PP. 402-417.
    • MASON,B. J., 1954: Bursting of bubbles at the surface of sea water. Nature, 174. pp. 470-471.
    • MIYAKEY,., 1951: The possibility and the allowable limit of formation of air bubbles in the sea. Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics, 2, pp. 95-101.
    • MOORED,. J., 1952: Measurements of condensation nuclei over the North Atlantic. Quart. J . Roy Met. Soc., 78, pp. 596-602.
    • MOORED,. J., and B. J. MASON1,954: The concentration, size distribution and production rate of large salt nuclei over the oceans. Quarf. J . Roy. Met. S O L , 80, PP. 583-590.
    • OWENSJ., S., 1926: Condensation of water from the air upon hygroscopic crystals. Proc. Roy. Soc., London, A, 110, pp. 738-752.
    • RAKESTRAWN,. W., and W. M. EMMEL,1938: The solubility of nitrogen and argon in sea water. J . Phys. Chem., 0,pp. I Z I I - I Z I ~ .
    • REDFIELDA,. C., 1948: The exchange of oxygen across the sea surface.]. Mar. Res., 7. pp. 347-361.
    • STUHLMAN0,.. 1932: The mechanics of effervescence. Physics, 2, pp. 457-466.
    • TWOMEYS,., 1955: The distribution of sea-salt nuclei in air over land. J. Met., 12, pp. 81-86.
    • WOODCOCKA,. H., 1948: Note concerning human respiratory irritation associated with high concentrations of plankton and mass mortality of marine organisms. J. Mar. Res., 7, pp. 56-62.
    • WOODCOCKA, . H., and MARYM. GIFFORD,1949: Sampling atmospheric sea-salt nuclei over the ocean. J. Mar. Res., 8, pp. 177-197.
    • WOODCOCKA,. H., 1952: Atmospheric salt particles and raindrops. J . Met., 9,pp. 200-212.
    • - 1953: Salt nuclei in marine air as a function of altitude and wind force. J . Met., 10, pp. 362-371.
    • WOODCOCKA,. H. and D. C. BLANCHAR1D9,55: Tests of the salt-nuclei hypothesis of rain formation. Tellus, 87 PP. 437-448.
    • WORTHINGTOAN., M., and R. S. COLE,1897: Impact with a liquid surface, studied by the aid of instantaneous photography. Phil. Trans., 189A, pp. 137-148 WRIGHTH,. L., 1940: Atmospheric opacity at Velentia. Quarf.J . Roy. M e f . Soc., 66, pp. 66-77.
    • WYMANJ,R., J., P. F. SCHOLANDEGR.,A. EDWARDSan,d L. IRVING1,952: On the stability of gas bubbles in sea water. J. Mar. Res., 11, pp. 47-62.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from