LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bigeni, Josephine; Bigeni, Sarah; Balzan, Martin (2013)
Publisher: Journal of European CME
Journal: Journal of European CME
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: e-learning, web-based learning, undergraduate medical education, learning management system
Introduction: e-Learning has been shown to be an effective and useful tool in medical education. An e-learning project was part financed through EU funds project ESF1.19 (Malta).Objective: To assess if medical students using e-learning are in front of the screen while using the e-lectures.Method: Eighty-seven finalyear medical students were encouraged to complete an online respiratory course (13 streamed lectures+13 quizzes) on a voluntary basis and were offered a reward on completion. A moodle e-learning management system collected data regarding user activity, in particular the duration of participation. A group of 14 core medical trainees who were forewarned of detection of possible irregular activity was also observed as a reference group.Results: Forty-three medical students completed all modules. Six lectures with corresponding quizzes were analysed; 65.5% (male 66.7%, female 64.1%) of the lectures were completed within the expected time frame; in 19% of lectures, users logged in for a period of 5 minutes less than the duration of the lecture, while 14.7% of users logged in for a duration that was twice as long as the total duration of the lecture. Only 16.3% of students completed all lectures within the established period; 27.9%, 20.9%, and 18.6% missed one, two, and three, lectures respectively; and 16.3% missed more than four lectures. In the other group (the 14 forewarned core medical trainees), 65 modules amongst 12 trainees showed that trainees completed a module in a mean of 113.25% (95% confidence interval 109.72–116.78) of the actual duration of a lecture.Conclusion: The study indicates that in 83.7% of the cases, there was at least one instance per user during which the user was not physically present throughout the presentation of a lecture. The e-learning management systems should be robust so as to detect this kind of behaviour before certification.Keywords: e-learning, web-based learning, undergraduate medical education, learning management system(Published: 23 October 2013)Citation: Journal of European CME 2013, 2: 22826 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jecme.v2i0.22826
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006;81:207-212.
    • 2. Bandla H, Franco RA, Simpson D, Brennan K, McKanry J, Bragg D. Assessing learning outcomes and cost effectiveness of an online sleep curriculum for medical students. J Clin Sleep Med 2012;8:439-443.
    • 3. Wutoh R, Boren SA, Balas EA. eLearning: a review of internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004;24: 20-30.
    • 4. Leong S, Mc Laughlin P, O'Connor OJ, O'Flynn S, Maher MM. An assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of an e-learning module in delivering a curriculum in radiation protection to undergraduate medical students. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:203-209.
    • 5. Palmer EJ, Devitt PG. Limitations of student-driven formative assessment in a clinical clerkship. A randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2008;8:29.
    • 6. Bigeni J, Bilocca D, Balzan M. Usage patterns of and feedback on online e-learning modules for 'common trunk' trainees in medicine. J Eur CME 2012;1:36-41.
    • 7. Abendroth M, Harendza S, Riemer M. Clinical decision making: a pilot e-learning study. Clin Teach 2013;10:51-55.
    • 8. Critchley LA, Kumta SM, Ware J, Wong JW. Web-based formative assessment case studies: role in a final year medicine two-week anaesthesia course. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37:637-645.
    • 9. Lanier MM. Academic integrity and distance learning. J Crim Justice Educ 2006;17:244-261.
    • 10. Şendağ S, Duran M, Robert Fraser M. Surveying the extent of involvement in online academic dishonesty (e-dishonesty) related practices among university students and the rationale students provide: one university's experience. Comput Hum Behav 2012;28: 849-860.
    • 11. Adkins J, Kenkel C, Lim CL. Deterrents to online academic dishonesty. J Learn High Educ 2005;1:17-22.
    • 12. Olt M. Ethics and distance education: strategies for minimizing academic dishonesty in online assessment. Online J Dist Learn Admin 2002;5(3). [Online] Available at: http://www.westga.edu/ ~distance/ojdla/fall53/olt53.html
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from