LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Langland, Rolf H.; Baker, Nancy L. (2004)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
An adjoint-based procedure for assessing the impact of observations on the short-range forecast error in numerical weather prediction is described. The method is computationally inexpensive and allows observation impact to be partitioned for any set or subset of observations, by instrument type, observed variable, geographic region, vertical level or other category. The cost function is the difference between measures of 24-h and 30-h global forecast error in the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS) during June and December 2002. Observations are assimilated at 00UTC in the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) Atmospheric Variational Data Assimilation System (NAVDAS). The largest error reductions in the Northern Hemisphere are produced by rawinsondes, satellite wind data, and aircraft observations. In the Southern Hemisphere, the largest error reductions are produced by Advanced TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder (ATOVS) temperature retrievals, satellite wind data and rawinsondes. Approximately 60% (40%) of global observation impact is attributed to observations below (above) 500 hPa. A significant correlation is found between observation impact and cloud cover at the observation location. Currently, without consideration of moisture observations and moist processes in the forecast model adjoint, the observation impact procedure accounts for about 75% of the actual reduction in 24-h forecast error.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baker, N. L. and Daley, R. 2000. Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation targeting problem. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126, 1431-1454.
    • Bouttier, F. and Kelly, G. 2001. Observing system experiments in the ECMWF 4D-Var data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 127, 1469-1488.
    • Daley, R. and Barker, E. 2001. NAVDAS Source Book 2001. NRL/PU/7530-01-441. Available from the Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, 163 pp.
    • Fourrie, N., Doerenbecher, A., Bergot, T. and Joly, A. 2002. Adjoint sensitivity of the forecast to TOVS observations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128, 2759-2777.
    • Guymer, L. 1978. Operational application of satellite imagery to synoptic analysis in the Southern Hemisphere. Technical Report No. 26, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia.
    • Hogan, T. F., Rosmond, T. E. and Pauley, R. L. 1999. The navy operational global atmospheric prediction system: recent changes and testing of gravity wave and cumulus parameterizations. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, Denver, CO, Am. Meteorol. Soc., 60-65.
    • Langland, R. H., Shapiro, M. A. and Gelaro, R. 2002. Initial condition sensitivity and error growth in forecasts of the 25 January 2000 East Coast snowstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev. 130, 957-974.
    • McNally, A. P. 2002. A note on the occurrence of cloud in meteorologically sensitive areas and the implications for advanced infrared sounders. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128, 2551-2556.
    • Rabier, F., Klinker, E., Courtier, P. and Hollingsworth, A. 1996. Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122, 121-150.
    • Rao, P. A., Velden, C. S. and Braun, S. A. 2002. The vertical error characteristics of GOES-derived winds: description and experiments with numerical weather prediction. J. Appl. Meteorol. 41, 253- 271.
    • Reale, A. L., Chalfant, M. L., Allegrino, A. S., Tiley, F. H., Gerguson, M. P. et al. 2003. Advanced-TOVS (ATOVS) sounding products from
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from