Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Rees, Kate; Zweigenthal, Virginia; Joyner, Kate (2014)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Global Health Action
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health, health systems, RA1-1270, Public aspects of medicine, mental health, health services, intimate partner violence, interpersonal violence, Gender Studies; Public Health; Health Systems; Health Services, domestic violence, interpersonal violence; intimate partner violence; domestic violence; mental health; health services; health systems, Public Health
Background: Despite a high burden of disease, in South Africa, intimate partner violence (IPV) is known to be poorly recognised and managed. To address this gap, an innovative intersectoral model for the delivery of comprehensive IPV care was piloted in a rural sub-district.Objective: To evaluate the initiative from the perspectives of women using the service, service providers, and managers.Design: A qualitative evaluation was conducted. Service users were interviewed, focus groups were conducted amongst health care workers (HCW), and a focus group and interviews were conducted with the intersectoral implementation team to explore their experiences of the intervention. A thematic analysis approach was used, triangulating the various sources of data.Results: During the pilot, 75 women received the intervention. Study participants described their experience as overwhelmingly positive, with some experiencing improvements in their home lives. Significant access barriers included unaffordable indirect costs, fear of loss of confidentiality, and fear of children being removed from the home. For HCW, barriers to inquiry about IPV included its normalisation in this community, poor understanding of the complexities of living with violence and frustration in managing a difficult emotional problem. Health system constraints affected continuity of care, privacy, and integration of the intervention into routine functioning, and the process of intersectoral action was hindered by the formation of alliances. Contextual factors, for example, high levels of alcohol misuse and socio-economic disempowerment, highlighted the need for a multifaceted approach to addressing IPV.Conclusions: This evaluation draws attention to the need to take a systems approach and focus on contextual factors when implementing complex interventions. The results will be used to inform decisions about instituting appropriate IPV care in the rest of the province. In addition, there is a pressing need for clear policies and guidelines framing IPV as a health issue.Keywords: interpersonal violence; intimate partner violence; domestic violence; mental health; health services; health systems(Published: 12 September 2014)Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 24588 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.24588SPECIAL ISSUE: This paper is part of the Special Issue: Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health. More papers from this issue can be found at http://www.globalhealthaction.net
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. World Health Organization (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    • 2. Norman R, Bradshaw D, Schneider M, Jewkes R, Mathews S, Abrahams N. Estimating the burden of disease attributable to interpersonal violence in South Africa in 2000. S Afr Med J 2007; 97: 653 6.
    • 3. Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Laubscher R, Hoffman M, Health DC. Intimate partner violence: prevalence and risk factors for men in Cape Town, South Africa. Violence Vict 2006; 21: 247 64.
    • 4. Jewkes R, Penn-kekana L, Levin J, Ratsaka M, Schrieber M. ''He must give me money, he mustn't beat me'' violence against women in three South African provinces. Pretoria: South African Medical Research Council; 1999.
    • 5. Jina R, Jewkes R, Hoffman S, Dunkle K, Nduna M, Shai N. Adverse mental health outcomes associated with emotional abuse in young rural South African women: a cross-sectional study. J Interpers Violence 2012; 27: 862 80.
    • 6. Ellsberg M, Jansen HAFM, Heise L, Watts CH, Garc´ıa-moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet 2008; 371: 1165 72.
    • 7. Sharps PW, Laughon K, Giangrande SK. Intimate partner violence and the childbearing year: maternal and infant health consequences. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007; 8: 105 16.
    • 8. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow SD. Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. Lancet 2004; 363: 1415 21.
    • 9. World Health Organization (2013). Responding to intimate partner and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    • 10. Colombini M, Mayhew SH, Ali SH, Shuib R, Watts C. An integrated health sector response to violence against women in Malaysia: lessons for supporting scale up. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 548.
    • 11. Hegarty K, O'Doherty L, Taft A, Chondros P, Brown S, Valpied J, et al. Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 249 58.
    • 12. Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: the end of routine screening. Lancet 2013; 382: 190 1.
    • 13. Colombini M, Mayhew S, Ali SH, Shuib R, Watts C. ''I feel it is not enough . . .'' Health providers' perspectives on services for victims of intimate partner violence in Malaysia. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 65.
    • 14. Tavrow P. Promote or discourage: how providers can influence service use. In: Malarcher S, ed. Social determinants of sexual and reproductive health: informing future research and programme implementation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010, pp. 15 36.
    • 15. Kim J, Motsei M. ''Women enjoy punishment'': attitudes and experiences of gender-based violence among PHC nurses in rural South Africa. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54: 1243 54.
    • 16. Sprague S, Kaloty R, Madden K, Dosanjh S, Mathews DJ, Bhandari M. Perceptions of intimate partner violence: a cross sectional survey of surgical residents and medical students. J Inj Violence Res 2011; 5: 1 10.
    • 17. Zink T, Regan S, Goldenhar L, Pabst S, Rinto B. Intimate partner violence: what are physicians' perceptions? J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17: 332 40.
    • 18. Laisser RM, Lugina HI, Emmelin M. Striving to make a difference: health care worker experiences with intimate partner violence clients in Tanzania. Health Care Women Int 2009; 30: 64 78.
    • 19. Djikanovic B, Celik H, Simic S, Matejic B, Cucic V. Health professionals' perceptions of intimate partner violence against women in Serbia: opportunities and barriers for response improvement. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 80: 88 93.
    • 20. Jacobs T, Jewkes R. Vezimfilho: a model for health sector response to gender violence in South Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002; 78(Suppl 1): 51 6.
    • 21. O'Campo P, Kirst M, Tsamis C, Chambers C, Ahmad F. Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: evidence generated from a realist-informed systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72: 855 66.
    • 22. Joyner K, Mash R. Recognizing intimate partner violence in primary care: Western Cape, South Africa. PLoS One 2012; 7: e29540.
    • 23. Statistics South Africa (2013). Census 2011 Municipal Factsheet. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
    • 24. Groenewald P, Berteler M, Bradshaw D, Coetzee D, Cornelius K, Daniels J, et al. Western Cape Mortality Profile 2010. Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council; 2013.
    • 25. Parenzee P, Smythe D. Domestic violence and development: looking at the farming context. Cape Town: Institute of Criminology, University of Cape Town; 2003.
    • 26. Joyner K, Mash B. A comprehensive model for intimate partner violence in South African primary care: action research. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 399.
    • 27. Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi O. Integration of targeted health interventions into health systems: a conceptual framework for analysis. Health Policy Plan 2010; 25: 104 11.
    • 28. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77 101.
    • 29. ICT Services and System Development and Division of Epidemiology and Global Health (2013). OpenCode 3.4. Umea˚: Umea˚ University; 2013.
    • 30. McIntyre D, Thiede M, Birch S. Access as a policy-relevant concept in low- and middle-income countries. Health Econ Policy Law 2009; 4: 179 93.
    • 31. Levitt NS, Steyn K, Dave J, Bradshaw D. Chronic noncommunicable diseases and HIV-AIDS on a collision course: relevance for health care delivery, particularly in low-resource settings insights from South Africa. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94(Suppl): 1690 6.
    • 32. Robinson L, Spilsbury K. Systematic review of the perceptions and experiences of accessing health services by adult victims of domestic violence. Health Soc Care Community 2008; 16: 16 30.
    • 33. Chang JC, Cluss PA, Ranieri L, Hawker L, Buranosky R, Dado D, et al. Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: what women want. Womens Health Issues 2005; 15: 21 30.
    • 34. Feder GS, Hutson M, Ramsay J, Taket AR. Women exposed to intimate partner violence. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 22 37.
    • 35. Narula A, Agarwal G, McCarthy L. Intimate partner violence: patients' experiences and perceptions in family practice. Fam Pract 2012; 29: 593 600.
    • 36. Peltzer K, Pengpid S, McFarlane J, Banyini M. Mental health consequences of intimate partner violence in Vhembe district, South Africa. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013; 35: 545 50.
    • 37. Peacock D, Redpath J, Weston M, Evans K, Daub A, Greig A. Literature review on men, gender, health and HIV and AIDS in South Africa. Johannesburg: Sonke Gender Justice Network; 2008.
    • 38. Kulkarni SJ, Bell H, Rhodes DM. Back to basics: essential qualities of services for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women 2012; 18: 85 101.
    • 39. Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi O. A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems. Health Policy Plan 2010; 25: 1 14.
    • 40. Baker L, Egan-Lee E, Martimianakis M, Reeves S. Relationships of power: implications for interprofessional education. J Interprof Care 2011; 25: 98 104.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article