OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ellis, Jacqueline A.; Ootoova, Abigail; Blouin, Renee; Rowley, Betty; Taylor, Maurice; DeCourtney, Christine; Joyce, Margaret; Greenley, Wilma; Gaboury, Isabelle (2012)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: International Journal of Circumpolar Health
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: pain assessment, pain scale psychometrics, Inuktitut pain scale, Northern Pain Scale
Objectives. A culturally relevant, evidence-based pain assessment scale in Inuktitut is needed. Psychometric properties and preferences for the Northern Pain Scale (NorthPS), a revised version of the Wong- Baker FACES scale, were examined. Study design. This repeated-measures, within-subjects study involved 2 face-to-face interviews held 2 weeks apart. Methods. Participants were recruited from 2 schools and a community centre in Pangnirtung, Nunavut, Canada. Three pain scales (NorthPS, FACES and a numerical rating scale) were used to rate the pain portrayed in an adapted version of the Charleston Pediatric Pain Pictures (NorthCPPP, a series of 17 cartoon vignettes). Results. The study involved 188 participants ranging in age from 5 to 83 years. Compared with the established FACES and numerical scales, the concurrent validity of the NorthPS was acceptable, with all 3 pain scales producing similar scores for the North CPPP vignettes. The youngest children were slightly more accurate during the second interview; otherwise, scoring accuracy was similar during both interviews. Accuracy was also similar across pain scales. Spearman correlations between NorthPS and other scales were lowest for the “No” pain vignettes, and for the youngest children. Internal consistency was acceptable for the NorthPS when compared with FACES and numerical scales. FACES was preferred by the majority of children and NorthPS was preferred by the majority of adults. Conclusions. NorthPS, a pain scale adapted to Inuit language and culture, was validated using the NorthCPPP with children and adults. The NorthPS is a well-understood, culturally and linguistically adapted option for the assessment of pain for Inuktitut-speaking children and adults.(Int J Circumpolar Health 2011; 70(3):274–285)Keywords: pain assessment, pain scale psychometrics, Inuktitut pain scale, Northern Pain Scale
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1.  Inuit  Circumpolar  Council  (ICC).  Inuit  Circumpolar  Council  (ICC). Ottawa:   Inuit  Circumpolar  Council  (ICC);  2007  [cited  2010  Feb  1].  Available  from:  http:// Lang=En&Parent_ID=¤t_slide_num=.
    • 2.  Health  Canada.  Closing  the  gaps  in  Aboriginal  health.  Ottawa:  Health  Canada;  2005  [cited  2010  Feb  1].  Available  from: bull/2003-5-aboriginal-autochtone/intro-eng.php.
    • 3.  Martin  BD,  Macdonald  SM.  The  management  of  ear  disease:  guidelines  for  Aboriginal  health  care  programs.  Int J Circumpolar Health 1998;57(Suppl 1):268-275.
    • 4.  Innis  J,  Bikaunieks  N,  Petryshen  P,  Zellermeyer  V,  Ciccarelli  L.  Patient  satisfaction  and  pain  management:  an  educational  approach.  J  Nurs  Care  Qual  2004  Oct;19(4):  322-327.
    • 5.  Ersek  M,  Poe  CM.  Pain.  In:  Lewis  S,  Heitkemper  M,  Dirksen  SR,  editors.  Medical-surgical  nursing-assessment  and  management  of  clinical  problems.  St.  Louis:  Mosby; 2004.  p.  131-159.
    • 6.  Middleton  C.  Understanding  the  physiological  effects  of unrelieved pain.  Nurs  Times 2003;99(37):28-31.
    • 7.  Stinson  JN,  Kavanagh  T,  Yamada  J,  Gill  N,  Stevens  B.  Systematic  review  of  the  psychometric  properties,  interpretability  and  feasibility  of  self-report  pain  intensity  measures  for  use  in  clinical  trials  in  children  and  adolescents. Pain 2006;125(1-2):143-157.
    • 8.  Wong  DL,  Baker  CM.  Pain  in  children:  comparison  of  assessment scales.  Pediatr Nurs 1988;14(1):9-17.
    • 9.  Luffy  R,  Grove  SK.  Examining  the  validity,  reliability,  and  preference  of  three  pediatric  pain  measurement  tools  in  African-American  children.  Pediatr  Nurs  2003;29(1):  54-59.
    • 10.  Newman  CJ,  Lolekha  R,  Limkittikul  K,  Luangxay  K,  Chotpitayasunondh  T,  Chanthavanich  P.  A  comparison  of  pain  scales  in  Thai  children.  Arch  Dis  Child  2005;90  (3):269-270.
    • 11.  Badr  Zahr  LK,  Puzantian  H,  Abboud  M,  Abdallah  A,  Shahine  R.  Assessing  procedural  pain  in  children  with  cancer  in  Beirut,  Lebanon.  J  Pediatr  Oncol  Nurs  2006;23(6):311-320.
    • 12.  DeCourtney  C,  Jones  K,  Merriman  MP,  Heavener  N,  Branch  PK.  Establishing  a  culturally  sensitive  palliative  care  program  in  rural  Alaska  Native  American  communities. J Palliat Med 2003;6(3):501-510.  
    • 13.  Bieri  D,  Reeve  RA,  Champion  GD,  Addicoat  L,  Ziegler  JB.  The  Faces  Pain  Scale  for  the  self-assessment  of  the  severity  of  pain  experienced  by  children:  development,  initial  validation,  and  preliminary  investigation  for  ratio  scale properties.  Pain 1990;41(2):139-150.
    • 14.  Jensen  MP,  Karoly  P,  Braver  S.  The  measurement  of  clinical  pain  intensity:  a  comparison  of  six  methods.  Pain  1986;27(1):117-126.
    • 15.  Dudgeon  BJ,  Gerrard  BC,  Jensen  MP,  Rhodes  LA,  Tyler  EJ.  Physical  disability  and  the  experience  of  chronic  pain.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(2):229-235.
    • 16.  McGrath  PA.  An  assessment  of  children's  pain:  a  review  of  behavioural,  physiological  and  direct  scaling  techniques. Pain 1987;31(2):147-176.
    • 17.  von  Baeyer  CL,  Spagrud  LJ,  McCormic,  JC,  Choo  E,  Neville  K,  Connelly  MA.  Three  new  datasets  supporting  the  use  of  the  Numerical  Rating  Scale  (NRS11)  for  children's  self-reports  of  pain  intensity.  Pain  2009;143  (3):223-227.
    • 18.  von  Baeyer  CL.  Numerical  rating  scale  for  self-report  of  pain  intensity  in  children  and  adolescents:  recent  progress  and  further  questions.  Eur  J  Pain  2009;13(10):  1005-1007.
    • 19.  Bailey  B,  Daoust  R,  Doyon-Trottier  E,  Dauphin-Pierre  S,  Gravel  J.  Validation  and  properties  of  the  verbal  numerical  scale  in  children  with  acute  pain.  Pain  2010;149  (2):216-221.
    • 20.  Belter  RW,  McIntosh  JA,  Finch  AJ,  Saylor  CF.  Preschoolers'  ability  to  differentiate  levels  of  pain:  relative  effica - cy  of  three  self-report  measures.  J  Clin  Child  Psychol  1988;17(4):329-335.
    • 21.  Adesman  AR,  Walco  GA.  Validation  of  the  Charleston  Pediatric  Pain  Pictures  in  school-age  children.  J  Clin  Child Psychol 1992;21(1):10-13.
    • 22.  Walter  SD,  Eliasziw  M,  Donner  A.  Sample  size  and  optimal  designs  for  reliability  studies .  Stat  Med  1998;17(1):  101-110.
    • 23.  Streiner  DL,  Norman  GR.  Health  measurement  scales:  a  practical  guide  to  their  development  and  use.  3rd  ed.  Oxford: Oxford University Press;  2005. 423 p.
    • 24.  Clayton  JL.  Special  needs  of  older  adults  undergoing  surgery.  AORN J 2008;87(3):557-570.
    • 25.  Gordon  M,  Greenfield  E,  Marvin  J,  Hester  C,  Lauterbach  S.  Use  of  pain  assessment  tools:  is  there  a  preference? J Burn Care Rehabil 1998;19(5):451-454.
    • 26. Mullins CR,   Wild  TL. Pain management in a long-term  care  facility:  compliance  with  JCAHO  standards.  J  Pain  Palliat Care Pharmacother 2003;17(2):63-70.
    • 27.  Stanford  E,  Chambers  C,  Craig  K.  The  role  of  development  factors  in  predicting  young  children's  use  of  a  self-report scale for pain.  Pain 2006;120(1-2):16-23.
    • 28.  Chambers  CT,  Johnston  C.  Developmental  differences  in  children's  use  of  rating  scales.  J  Pediatr  Psychol  2002;  27(1):27-36.
    • 29.  Beyer  JE,  Knapp  TR.  Methodological  Issues  in  the  Measurement  of  Children's  Pain.  CHC  1986;14(4):233- 241.
    • 30.  Chambers  CT,  Giesbrecht  K,  Craig  KD,  Bennett  SM,  Huntsman  E.  A  comparison  of  faces  scales  for  the  measurement  of  pediatric  pain:  children's  and  parents'  ratings. Pain 1999;83(1):25-35.
    • 31.  Chambers  CT,  Hardial  J,  Craig  KD,  Court  C,  Montgomery  C.  Faces  scales  for  the  measurement  of  postoperative  pain  intensity  in  children  following  minor  surgery.  Clin J Pain 2005;21(3):277-285.
    • 32.  Manz  BD,  Mosier  R,  Nusser-Gerlach  MA,  Bergstrom  N,  Agrawal  S.  Pain  assessment  in  the  cognitively  impaired  and  unimpaired  elderly.  Pain  Manag  Nurs  2000;1(4):  106-115.
    • 33.  Gibbs  J.  Tribes:  a  new  way  of  learning  and  being  together. California:  Centersource Systems;  2001.  432 p.
    • 34.  Gardner  H.  Frames  of  mind:  the  theory  of  multiple  intelligences.  2nd  ed.  Great  Britain:  Fontana  Press;  1993.  440 p.
    • 35.  Gardner  H.  Intelligence  reframed:  multiple  intelligences  for  the  21st  century.  New  York:  Basic  Books;  1999.  292 p.
    • 36.  Stern  PR.  Learning  to  be  smart:  an  exploration  of  the  culture  of  intelligence  in  a  Canadian  Inuit  community.  Am  Anthropologist 1999;101(3):502-514.
    • 37.  Wright  SC,  Taylor  DM,  Ruggiero  K.  Examining  the  potential  for  academic  achievement  among  Inuit  children:  comparisons  on  the  raven  coloured  progressive  matrices. J Cross Cult Psychol 1996;27(6):733-753.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok