Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Swanberg, Neil; Båmstedt, Ulf (1991)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Polar Research
Languages: English
Types: Article
The Ctenophora Mertensia ovum and Beroe cucumis, collected using both conventional sampling gear and scuba divers, were studied in the Barents Sea east of Bjørnøya and North Norway in spring 1987 and summer 1988. Among the gelatinous zooplankton, Mertensia ovum was the most consistently abundant copepod predator. Feeding experiments were conducted to evaluate the predation rate of M. ovum in various trophic regimes. This ctenophore can take prey varying in size from small copepods to amphipods and krill, but gut-content analyses from field-collected specimens as well as experimental results showed that the main food source for adults was large-sized copepods (e.g. Calanus finmarchicus, C. glacialis, C. hyperboreus, Metridia longa). The robust tentacle arrray of M. ovum makes this species effective as a predator on large prey. The high potential predation rate of this ctenophore relative to its estimated metabolic cost of only 1.7% of the body energy content d?1 suggests that M. ovum may be able to maintain a positive energy balance even in conditions of low prey abundance. It is suggested that a single exploitation of a zooplankton patch may provide energy for survival for a very long time. The potential impact of M. ovum on Barents Sea copepod populations is estimated on the basis of the minimal observed average daily ration in experiments and from field data on gut contents. Using abundances of copepods for the area, and the actual predator biomass collected, it was estimated that an average of 0.7% of the copepod fauna per day could fall prey to this predator.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alldredge. A. 1972: Abandoned larvacean houses: A unique food source in the pelagic environment. Science 177,885887, Anderson, E. 1974: Trophic interactions among ctenophores and copepods in St. Margaret's Bay, Nova Scotia. Ph.D. Thesis. Sept.. 1974. Dalhousie Univ. 85 pp.
    • Biggs. D. C.. Bidigare. R. R. & Smith. D. E. 1981: Population density of gelatinous macrozooplankton: I n situ estimation in oceanic surface waters. Biol. Oceanog. I . 157-173.
    • Blggs. D. C . . Laval. P.. Braconnot, J - C . , Carri, C.. Goy. J . . Masson. M. & Morand. P. 1987: In situ observations of Mediterranean zooplankton by SCUBA and bathyscaphe in the Ligurian Sea in Apnl 1986. Pp. 153-161 i n : “Diving for Science...86.“ Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Scientific Diving Symposium. 31 Oct-3 Nov.. 1986, Tallahassee, Florida. American Academy of Underwater Sciences.
    • BBmstedt, U. 1981: Water and organic content of boreal macrozooplankton and their significance for the energy content. Sarsia 66. 59-66
    • Deason. E. E. & Smayda. T. J. 1982:Ctenophore-zooplanktonphytoplankton interactions in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. U.S.A., during 1972-1977. J . Plankton Res. 4, 203-217.
    • De Lafontaine, Y. & Legget, W. C. 1987: Effect of container size on estimates of mortality and predation rates in experiments with macrozooplankton and larval fish. Can. J. Fish. Aq. Sci. 44, 1534-1543.
    • Elliot, J . M. & Davison. W. 1975: Energy equivalents of oxygen consumption in animal energetics. Oecologica (Eerl.) 19. 19S201.
    • Feigenbaum. D. & Reeve, M. R . 1977: Prey detection in the Chaetognatha: Response to a vibrating probe and experimental determination of attack distance in large aquaria. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 1052-1058.
    • Fraser, J. H. 1970:The ecology of the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus in Scottish waters. 1. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 33, 149-168.
    • Greene, C. H. 1986: Patterns of prey selection: implications of predator foraging tactics. A m . Naturalist 128, 824-839.
    • Greene, C. H., Landry. M. R. & Monger, B. C. 1986: Foraging behavior and prey selection by the ambush entangling predator Pleurobrachia Eachei. Ecology 67, 149S1501.
    • Greve, W. 1970: Cultivation experiments on North Sea ctenophores. Helgolander Wiss. Meeresunters. 20. 304-317.
    • Greve, W. 1971: Okologische Untersuchungen an Pleurobrachiapileus. 1. Freilanduntersuchungen. Helgoliinder Wiss. Meeresunters. 22, 305-325.
    • Greve, W. 1972: Okologische Untersuchungen an Pleurobrachia pileus. 2. Laboratoriums-untersuchungen.Helgolander Wiss. Meeresunters. 23. 141-164.
    • Greve, W. 1981: Invertebrate predator control in a coastal marine ecosystem: the significance of Beroe gracilis (Ctenophora). Kieler Meeresforsch., Sonderh. 5 , 211-217.
    • Hamner, W. M. 1975: Underwater observations of blue-water plankton: logistics, techniques and safety procedures for divers at sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20, 104S1102.
    • Hamner, W. M., Madin, L. P., Alldredge, A . L.. Gilmer. R. W. & Hamner, P. P. 1975: Underwater observations of gelatinous zooplankton: Sampling problems, feeding biology and behavior. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20. 907-917.
    • Hamner, W. M. & Schneider, D. 1986: Regularly spaced rows of medusae in the Bering Sea: Role of Langmuir circulation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31, 171-177.
    • Harbison, G . R., Madin, L. P. & Swanberg, N. R. 1978: On the natural history and distribution of oceanic ctenophores. Deep-sea Res. 25. 23S256.
    • Hirche, H.-J. 1987: Temperature and plankton. 11. Effect on respiration and swimming activity in copepods from the Greenland Sea. Mar. Eiol. 94, 347-356.
    • Hirota, J . 1972: Laboratory culture and metabolism of the planktonic ctenophore. Pleurobrachia bachei A . Agassiz. Pp. 465-484 in Takenouti, Y. (ch. ed.): Biological oceanography of the northern North Pacific Ocean. Idemitsu Shoten, Tokyo.
    • Hirota. I. 1974: Quantitative natural history of Pleurobrachia bachei in La Jolla Bight. Fish. Bull. 72, 295-335.
    • Ivlev, V . S. 1961: Experimental ecology of the feeding offishes (translated from Russian by D. Scott). Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
    • Kamshilov, M. M. 1955: Pitanie Grebnevika Beroe cucumis. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR Zoologiya 102, 399-402.
    • Kamshilov, M. M. 1960: Pitanie Grebnevika Beroe cucumis Fabr. Doklady A kademii Nauk SSSR Gidrobiologia 130, 1138-1140.
    • Kremer, P. 1976: Population dynamics and ecological energetics of a pulsed zooplankton predator. the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. Pp. 197-215 in Wiley, M. L. (ed.): Estuarine Processes. Vol. 1 . Uses, Stresses, and Adaptations to the Estuary. Academic Press Inc., New York.
    • Rey. F., Skjoldal. H - R . & Hassel. A. 1987: Seasonal development of plankton in the Barents Sea: a conceptual modcl. ICES 1987/S,ymp.56. 36 pp.
    • Romer. F. 1903: Die Ctenophoren. Pp. 66-90 in Romer. F.. & Schaudinn. F. (cds.): Fauna Arcrica. Verlag von Gustav Fischcr. Jena.
    • Skjoldal, H.-R., Hassel, A , . Rey. F. & Loeng. H . 1987:Spring phytoplankton development and zooplankton reproduction in the central Barents Sea in the period 197%1984. Pp. 59- 89 in Loeng. H. (ed.): The effecr of oceanographic conditions on distribution and population dvnamics of commercial fish sfocks in the Barencr Sea. Proc. 3rd Soviet-Norwegian Symp. Murmansk. 26-28 May 1986. Institute of Marine Research. Bergen.
    • Sullivan. B. K . & Reeve. M. R.1982: Comparison of estimates of the predatory impact of ctenophores by two independent techniques. Mar. Biol. 68. 61-65.
    • Swanberg. N . 1974: The feeding behavior of Beroe ouara Mar. Biol. 24, 6%76.
    • Swanberg. N. 1979: The ecology of colonial radiolarians: their colony morphology. trophic interactions and associations. behavior, distribution and the photosynthesis of their symbionts Ph.D. Thesis. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology/ Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Technical Rcport WHOI-79-79. 202 pp.
    • Swanberg. N. R . 1983: The trophic role of colonial Radiolaria in oligotrophic oceanic environments. Limnol.Oceanogr 28. 65S666.
    • Swanberg. N. R . & Bimstedt. U. 1991: The role of prey stratification in the predation pressure by the cydippid ctenophore Merrensia ouum (Fabricus) in the Barents Sea. 5th International Coelenterate Symposium. July, 1989. Hvdrobiologv 216/217. 343349.
    • Tande. K. S.. Hassel. A. & Slagstad. D. 1985: Gonad maturation and possible life cycle strategies in Calunus finmarchicuc and Calanuc glacialis in the northwestern part of the Barents Sea. Pp. 141-155 in Gray. J . S . & Chistiansen, M. E. (eds.): Marine biology of polar regions and effects of stress on marine organisms. l8rh European Marine Biology Symposium. Unio. of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. I 4 2 0 Aug.. 1983. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester, England.
    • Van der Veer. H. W. & Sadie. C . F. M. 1984: Seasonal Occurrence of the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus i n the western Dutch Wadden Sea. Mar. Biol. 79. 21!&227.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from