Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Larsson, Joakim; Löfdahl, Annica; Pérez Prieto, Hector (2010)
Publisher: Education Inquiry
Journal: Education Inquiry
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: discipline, assessment, governmentality, PISA
As Sweden drew nearer to the 2006 national election, two themes emerged in the educational debate: a concern for order and discipline in schools, and the ambition to raise educational levels of achievement. The objective of this article is to locate these two themes within a broader framework of understanding by: 1) discussing examples of how the reinforcement of disciplinary power in schools was introduced, justified and deployed by right-wing constellations during this time; and 2) to relate these policy changes to both a Foucauldian theory of power and to current discussions on performativity, assessment and governmentality. Considered as attempts to locate students, teachers and schools within networks of performativity, thereby strengthening the image of Sweden as a “performing knowledge nation”, we argue that these policy changes have a much closer relationship with the art of “perception management” than with any genuine interest in education for human proficiency.Keywords: discipline, assessment, governmentality, PISA(Published: 1 September 2010)Citation: Education Inquiry Vol. 1, No. 3, September 2010, pp.177–195
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Apple, M.W. (2005). Doing things the “right” way: Legitimating educational inequalities in conservative times. In: Educational Review, 57(3), pp. 271-293.
    • Andersson, R. (2006). The Unveiling of Merit. The Local Community and the Prudent Citizen. In: Popkewitz, T.S. (ed.) (2006). “The future is not what it appears to be”: pedagogy, genealogy and political epistemology: in honor and in memory of Kenneth Hultqvist, pp. 62-83. Stockholm: HLS förlag
    • Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.
    • Ball, S. J. (2006). Performativities and Fabrications in the Education Economy: Towards the Performative Society. In: Lauder, H.; Brown, P.; Dillabough, J.; Halsey, A.H. (eds.) (2006). Education, Globalization and Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Ball, S.J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 215-228.
    • Brembeck, H., Johansson, B., & Kampmann, J. (eds.) (2004). Beyond the competent child. Exploring contemporary childhoods in the Nordic welfare societies. Frederiksberg: Roskilde University Press.
    • Bauman, Z. (2000). The individualized society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
    • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
    • Benveniste, L. (2006). The Political Structuration of Assessment: Negotiating State Power and Legitimacy. In: Lauder, H.; Brown, P.; Dillabough, J.; Halsey, A.H. (eds.) (2006). Education, Globalization and Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Dahlberg, G.; Bloch, M. (2006). Is the Power to See and Visualize Always the Power to Control? In: In: Popkewitz, T.S. (ed.) (2006). “The future is not what it appears to be”: pedagogy, genealogy and political epistemology: in honor and in memory of Kenneth Hultqvist, pp. 105-123. Stockholm: HLS förlag
    • Englund, T. (1995). Utbildningspolitiskt systemskifte? Stockholm: HLS.
    • Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: the reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. In: Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 619-634.
    • Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
    • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.
    • Foucault, M. (1977/1995). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
    • Foucault, M. (1983). The Subject and Power. In H.L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (1983). Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
    • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds.). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87-104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Gillies, D. (2008). Developing Governmentality: Conduct [to the third power] and Education Policy. In: Journal of Education Policy; Vol. 23 No. 4 pp. 415-427.
    • Grek, S. (2009). Governing by Numbers: The Pisa “Effect” in Europe. In: Journal of Education Policy; Vol. 24 No. 1 pp. 23-37.
    • Halsey, A. H.; Lauder, H.; Brown, P.; Wells, A. (1997). Education, Culture, Economy, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Hultqvist, K. (2006). The future is already here - as it always has been. The new teacher's subject, the pupil and the technologies of the soul. In T. S. Popkewitz, K. Petersson, U. Olsson, & Kowalczyk (eds.). “The future is not what it appears to be”. Pedagogy, genealogy and political epistemology (pp. 193-212). Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
    • James, A., & James, A. L. (2004). Constructing Childhood. Theory, Policy and Social Practice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    • Lauder, H., Brown, P., Dillabough, J.A. & Halsey, A.H. (2006). Education, Globalization & Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Lindblad, S. (1994): Notes on Post-Welfare Education: Towards a New-Liberal Education Reform in Sweden? I Kallós, D. & Lindblad, S. 1994: New Policy Contexts for Education: Sweden and United Kingdom. Pedagogiska rapporter från Pedagogiska institutionen, Umeå universitet, Nr 42.
    • Lindblad, S.; Popkewitz, T. (eds.) (1999). Education Governance and Social Integration and Exclusion: National Cases of Educational Systems and Recent Reforms. Uppsala Reports on Education 34. Uppsala Universitet: Pedagogiska Institutionen.
    • Lindblad, S.; Lundahl, L.; Lindgren, J.; Zackari, G. (2002). Educating for the New Sweden? In: Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46: 3, pp. 283-303.
    • Lindblad, S.; Johannesson, I.; Ingolfur, A.; Simola, H. (2002). Education Governance in
    • Transition: An introduction. In: Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46: 3, pp. 237- 245.
    • Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.
    • Löfdahl, A., Pérez Prieto, H. (2009a). Between control and resistance: planning and evaluation texts in the Swedish preschool. In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 393-408.
    • Löfdahl, A.; Pérez Prieto, H. (2009b). Institutional Narratives within the Performative Preschool in Sweden - “If we write that we're no good, that's not good publicity!” In: Early Years, Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 261-270.
    • Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S. (2009). Overview of TIMSS 2007. Chestnut Hill, Ma: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston college.
    • Masschelein, J. (ed.) (2007). The learning society from the perspective of governmentality. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • OECD (2006). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators - 2006 Edition.
    • Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 147-161(15).
    • Peters, M.A. (2007). Foucault, Biopolitics and the Birth of Neoliberalism. In Critical Studies in Education, 48:2 (pp. 165-178).
    • Petersson, K; Olsson, U; Popkewitz, T.S. (2007). Nostalgia, the Future, and the Past as Pedagogical Technologies. In: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education; Vol. 28 No. 1 pp. 49-67.
    • Petterson, D. (2008). Internationell Kunskapsbedömning som inslag i nationell styrning av skolan. Uppsala: Uppsala Studies in Education 0347-1314; 120.
    • Pongratz, L.A. (2007). Voluntary Self-control. Educational reform as a governmental strategy. In: Masschelein, J.; Simons, M; Bröckling, U.; Pongratz, L (eds.). The Learning Society from the Perspective of Governmentality, pp. 57-68. Malden: Blackwell.
    • Schutz, A. (2004). Rethinking Domination and Resistance: Challenging Postmodernism. Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, No. 1 (pp. 15-23).
    • Alliance for Sweden (2006). More knowledge. A modern educational policy. Accessed 080930 via URL: http://www.alliansforsverige.se/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/mer_kunskap_-_ en_modern_utb.pdf
    • Björklund, J. (2006a). Regeringen blåser av gymnasiereformen. Dagens Nyheter, 11 October. Accessed online 080303 via URL: http://www.dn.se/opinion/debatt/regeringen-blaser-avgymnasiereformen-1.607209
    • Björklund, J. (2006b). Vi inför nationella prov i årskurs tre. Dagens Nyheter, November 29. Accessed online 080303 via URL: http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=572&a=592800 &previousRenderType=2
    • Björklund, J. (2004). Minska valfriheten i skolan!. Dagens Nyheter, 6 February.
    • Leijonborg, L.; Björklund, J. (2006). Förläng undervisningstiden och öka mängden hemläxor. Dagens Nyheter, 7 July.
    • Leijonborg, L.; Björklund, J. (2007). Vi satsar 3,5 miljarder på högre lärarkompetens. Dagens Nyheter, 20 April. Accessed online 080303 via URL: http://www.dn.se/opinion/debatt/visatsar-35-miljarder-pa-hogre-lararkompetens-1.551150
    • Ministry of Education (2007a). Press Release, 27 February. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
    • Ministry of Education (2007b). Press Release, 22 March. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
    • Ministry of Education (2007c). Press Release, 16 April. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
    • Ministry of Education (2007d). Press Release, 21 April. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
    • Ministry of Education (2007e). Government Bill 2006/07:6: Enhanced order, safety and peace in school. [Förbättrad ordning, trygghet och studiero i skolan]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from