LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sjølie, Ela (2015)
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: teacher education, pre-service teachers, student teachers, approaches to learning, academic literacies, learning practices, higher education

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
Even though recurring criticism has been directed against the academic part of teacher education, little research has focused on student teachers as they engage in their academic studies. Reporting on a study of 53 Norwegian student teachers, this article explores student teachers’ reading practices in university courses in education. The study draws on the notion of approaches to learning as a particularly influential perspective in research on higher education. The findings reveal that the student teachers predominantly apply a deep approach to learning (with the aim to understand) and that writing academic texts in particular acts as an enabler of this approach. However, the participants also reported considerable difficulties with reading pedagogical literature. The article suggests that, in order to understand the persistent criticism against teacher education, there is a need to pay explicit attention to supporting student teachers in dealing with different text genres and texts from different academic disciplines. It also suggests that the important factor in students’ engagement with theory is not necessarily that it can be used immediately in the classroom, but that they recognise themselves as persons. Finally, the article raises a question about the balance between breadth and depth in the university courses. © 2015 Ela Sjølie. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copyand redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose,even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ax, J. and Ponte, P. (2010). Moral issues in educational praxis: a perspective from pedagogiek and didactiek as human sciences in continental Europe. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18: 29 42.
    • Biggs, J. B. and Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. Berkshire, Open University Press.
    • Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: a critical study of learning to teach. Albany, N.Y., State University of New York Press.
    • Catterall, M. and Maclaran, P. (1997). Focus group data and qualitative analysis programs: coding the moving picture as well as the snapshots. Sociological Research Online 2: 53 61.
    • Cochran-Smith, M. and Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Studying teacher education: the report of the AERA Panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Diseth, A. (2001). Validation of a Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): application of structural equation modeling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45: 381 395.
    • Diseth, A. and Martinsen, O. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology 23: 195 207.
    • Diseth, A˚. (2007). Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 51: 185 204.
    • Eklund-myrskog, G. (1996). Students' ideas of learning. Conceptions, approaches and outcomes in different educational contexts. A˚bo, A˚bo Academy University Press.
    • Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke, Palgrave.
    • Entwistle, N. J. and Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research 41: 407 428.
    • Floden, R. E. and Meniketti, M. (2005). Research on the effects of coursework in the arts and sciences and in the foundations of education. Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Francis, H. and Hallam, S. (2000). Genre effects on higher education students' text reading for understanding. Higher Education 39: 279 296.
    • Grossman, P. and Mcdonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal 45: 184 205.
    • Gundem, B. and Hopmann, S. (1998). Didaktik and/or Curriculum - and international dialogue. New York, Peter Lang.
    • Haggis, T. (2003). Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into 'approaches to learning' research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal 29: 89 89.
    • Hallam, S. and Francis, H. (1998). Is my understanding yours? A study of higher education students' reading for understanding and the effects of different texts. Learning and Instruction 8: 83 95.
    • Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15: 1277 1288.
    • Kember, D., Jamieson, Q., Pomfret, M. and Wong, E. T. (1995). Learning approaches, study time and academic performance. Higher Education, 29: 329 343.
    • Kember, D. and Leung, D. Y. (1998). Influences upon students' perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology 18: 293 307.
    • Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal 311: 299 302.
    • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London, Routledge/Falmer.
    • Lawless, C. and Richardson, J. (2004). Monitoring the experiences of graduates in distance education. Customer Services for Taylor & Francis Group Journals, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106.
    • Lea, M. R. and Street, B. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach. In Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts, Lea, M. R. and Stierer, B. (eds.), 32 46. Guildford: The Society.
    • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K. and Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education 27: 27 52.
    • Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: understanding teaching and learning about teaching. London, Routledge.
    • Marton, F., Carlsson, M. A. and Halasz, L. (1992). Differences in understanding and the use of reflective variation in reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 1 16.
    • Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (1997). The experience of learning: implications for teaching and studying in higher education. Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press.
    • Marton, F. and S¨alj¨o, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4 11.
    • Marton, F. and Sa¨ljo¨, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education, Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N, (eds.), 2nd ed., 39 58. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
    • Marton, F. and Wenestam, C.-G. (1988). Qualitative differences in retention when a text is read several times. In Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues, Gruneberg, M., Morris, P. E. and Sykes, R. N (eds.), 633 643. New York: Wiley.
    • Mclean, M. (2001). Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement? Teaching in Higher Education 6, 399 413.
    • Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning: a cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 763 780.
    • Pettersen, R. C. (2007). Studenters opplevelse og evaluering av undervisning og laeringsmiljø: Presentasjon av Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) og validering av tre norske versjoner, Erfaringer med studiet (EMS) [Students' experience and evaluation of teaching and learning environment: presentation of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) - and validation of three Norwegian versions (EMS). Halden: Høgskolen i Østfold.
    • Pettersen, R. C. (2010). Validation of approaches to studying inventories in a Norwegian context: in search of 'quick-and-easy' and short versions of the ASI. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54, 239 261.
    • Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
    • Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129 150.
    • Richardson, J. T. (2011). Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 288 293.
    • Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education.
    • Roness, D. (2011). Still motivated? The motivation for teaching during the second year in the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 628 638.
    • Sadlo, G. and Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 253 274.
    • Saldan˜a, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. LosAngeles, Sage.
    • Sjølie, E. (2014). The role of theory in teacher education - reconsidered from a student teacher perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 729 750.
    • Tait, H., Entwistle, N. and Mccune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In Improving Students as Learners, RUST, C. (ed.), 262 271. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff & Learning Development.
    • Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251 266.
    • Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 49, 205 234.
    • Volet, S. E. and Chalmers, D. (1992). Investigation of qualitative differences in university students' learning goals, based on an unfolding model of stage development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 17 34.
    • Webb, G. (1997). Deconstructing deep and surface: towards a critique of phenomenography. Higher Education, 33, 195 212.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article