Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Yonemura, S.; Yokozawa, M.; Kawashima, S.; Tsuruta, H. (2011)
Publisher: Tellus B
Journal: Tellus B
Languages: English
Types: Article
CO and H2 uptake by soil was studied as a diffusion process. A diffusion model was used to determine how the surface fluxes (net deposition velocities) were controlled by in-situ microbial uptake rates and soil gas diffusivity calculated from the 3-phase system (solid, liquid, gas) in the soil. Analytical solutions of the diffusion model assuming vertical uniformity of soil properties showed that physical properties such as air-filled porosity and soil gas diffusivity were more important in the uptake process than in the emission process. To incorporate the distribution of in-situ microbial uptake, we used a 2-layer model incorporating “a microbiologically inactive layer and an active layer” as suggested from experimental results. By numerical simulation using the 2-layer model, we estimated the effect of several factors on deposition velocities. The variations in soil gas diffusivity due to physical properties, i.e., soil moisture and air-filled porosity, as well as to the depth of the inactive layer and in-situ microbial uptake, were found to be important in controlling deposition velocities. This result shows that the diffusion process in soil is critically important for CO and H2 uptake by soil, at least in soils with higher in-situ uptake rates and/or with large variation in soil moisture. Similar uptake rates and the difference in deposition velocity between CO and H2 may be attributable to differences in CO and H2 molecular diffusivity. The inactive layer is resistant to diffusion and creates uptake limits in CO and H2 by soil. The coupling of high temperature and a thick inactive layer, common in arid soils, markedly lowers net CO deposition velocity. The temperature for maximum uptake of CO changes with depth of the inactive layer.DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2000.d01-2.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ball, B. C., Dobbie, K. E., Parker, J. P. and Smith, K. A. 1997a. The influence of gas transport and porosity on methane oxidation in soils. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 23301-23308.
    • Ball, B. C., Smith, K. A., Klemedtsson, L., Brumme, R., Sitaula, B. K., Hansen, S., Prieme´, A., MacDonald, J. and Horgan, G. W. 1997b. The influence of soil gas transport properties on methane oxidation in a selection of northern european soils. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 23309-23317.
    • Bender, M. and Conrad, R. 1994. Microbial oxidation of methane, ammonium and carbon monoxide, and turnover of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide in soils. Biogeochemistry 27, 97-112.
    • Conrad, R. 1988. Biogeochemistry and ecophysiology of atmospheric CO and H2. Adv. Microb. Ecol. 10, 231-283.
    • Conrad, R. and Seiler, W. 1980a. Contribution of hydrogen production by biological nitrogen fixation to the global hydrogen budget. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 5493-5498.
    • Conrad, R. and Seiler, W. 1980b. Role of microorganisms in the consumption and production of atmospheric carbon monoxide by soil. Appl. Environ. Microb. 40, 437-445.
    • Conrad, R. and Seiler, W. 1985a. Influence of temperature, moisture, and organic carbon on the flux of H2 and CO between soil and atmosphere: field studies in subtropical regions. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 5699-5709.
    • Conrad, R. and Seiler, W. 1985b. Characteristics of abiological carbon monoxide formation from soil organic matter, humic acids, and phenolic compounds. Environ. Sci. T echnol. 19, 1165-1169.
    • Conrad, R., Weber, M. and Seiler, W. 1983. Kinetics and electron transport of soil hydrogenases catalyzing the oxidation of atmospheric hydrogen. Soil Boil. Biochem. 15, 167-173.
    • Do¨ rr, H., KatruV, L. and Levin, I. 1993. Soil texture parameterization of the methane uptake in aerated soils. Chemosphere 26, 697-713.
    • Ehhalt, D. H., Schmidt, U. and Heidt, L. E. 1977. Vertical profiles of molecular hydrogen in the troposphere and stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 5907-5911.
    • Fishman, J. and Crutzen, P. J. 1978. The origin of ozone in the troposphere. Nature 274, 855-858.
    • Heichel, G. H. 1973. Removal of carbon monoxide by field and forest soils. Environmental Quality 2, 419-423.
    • Ishihara, Y., Shimojima, E. and Harada, H. 1992. Water vapor transfer beneath bare soil where evaporation is influenced by a turbulent surface wind. Journal of Hydrology 131, 63-204.
    • Khalil, M. A. K. and Rasmussen, R. A. 1990. Global cycle of carbon monoxide: trends and mass balance. Chemosphere 20, 227-242.
    • Khalil, M. A. K. and Rasmussen, R. A. 1994. Global decrease in atmospheric carbon monoxide concentration. Nature 370, 639-641.
    • Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Zepp, R. G., Miller, W. L. and Burke, R. A. 1998. Carbon monoxide fluxes of diVerent soil layers in upland canadian boreal forests. T ellus 50B, 353-365.
    • Liebl, K. H. and Seiler, W. 1976. CO and H2 destruction at the soil surface. In: Microbial producrion and utilization of gases (ed. Schlegel, H. G., Gottschalk, G. and Pfenning, N.). Goltze, G o¨tingen, Germany, pp. 215-229.
    • McMahon, T. A. and Denison, P.J. 1979. Empirical atmospheric deposition parameters - a survey. Atmos. Envir. 13, 571-585.
    • Marrero, T. R. and Mason, E. A. 1972. Gaseous diVusion coeYcients. J. Phys Chem. Ref. Data 1, 3-118.
    • Matsueda, H., Inoue, H. Y., Sawa, Y., Tsutsumi, Y. and Ishii, M. 1998. Carbon monoxide in the upper troposphere over the western Pacific between 1993 and 1996. J. Geophy. Res. 103, 19,093-19,110.
    • Millington, R. J. and Quirk, J. M. 1961. Permeability of porous solids. T rans. Faraday Soc. 57, 1200-1207.
    • Moxley, J. M. and Smith, K. A. 1998a. Factors aVecting utilisation of atmospheric CO by soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 65-79.
    • Moxley, J. M. and Smith, K. A. 1998b. Carbon monoxide production and emission by some scottish soils. T ellus 50B, 151-162.
    • National Astronomical Observatory 1994. Science table. Maruzen, Tokyo, pp. 454 (in Japanese).
    • Novelli, P. C., Masarie, K. A. and Lang, P. M. 1998. Distribution and recent changes of carbon monoxide in the lower troposphere. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 19015-19033.
    • Novelli, P. C., Lang, P. M., Masarie, K. A., Hurst, D. F., Myers, R. and Elkins, J. W. 1999. Molecular hydrogen in the troposphere: Global distributions, trends, and budget. J. Geophys. Res., in press.
    • Potter, C. S., Klooster, S. A. and Chatfield, R. B. 1996. Consumption and production of carbon monoxide in soils: a glocal model analysis of spatial and seasonal variation. Chemosphere 33, 1175-1193.
    • Sallam, A., Jury, W. A. and Jetey, J. 1984. Measurement of gas diVusion coeYcient under relatively low airfilled porosity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48, 3-6.
    • Sanhueza, E., Dong, Y., ScharVe, D., Lobert, J. M. and Crutzen, P. J. 1998. Carbon monoxide uptake by temperate forest soils: eVects of leaves and humus layers. T ellus 50B, 51-58.
    • Sanhueza, E., Donoso, L., ScharVe, D. and Crutzen, P. J. 1994. Carbon monoxide fluxes from natural, managed, or cultivated savannah grasslands. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 16,421-16,427.
    • ScharVe, D., Hao, W. M., Donoso, L., Crutzen, P. J. and Sanhueza, E. 1990. Soil fluxes and atmospheric concentration of CO and CH4 in the northern part of the guayana shield, Venezuela. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 22475-22480.
    • Schmidt, U. 1978. The latitudinal and vertical distribution of molecular hydrogen in the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 941-946.
    • Seiler, W. and Conrad, R. 1987. Contribution of tropical ecosystem to the global budgets of trace gases, especially CH4, H2, CO and N2O. In: T he Geophysiology of Amazonia (ed. R. E. Dickinson). Wiley, New York, 133-162.
    • Seiler, W., Giehl, H. and Bunse, G. 1978. The influence of plants on atmospheric carbon monoxide. Pageoph. 116, 439-451.
    • Seiler, W., Giehl, H. and Roggendorf, P. 1980. Detection of carbon monoxide and hydrogen by conversion of mercury oxide to mercury vapor. Atmos. T ech. 12, 40-45.
    • Smith, K. A., Bremner, J. M. and Tabatabai, M. A. 1973. Sorption of gaseous atmospheric pollutants by soils. Soil Sci. 116, 313-319.
    • Spratt, H. G. and Hubbard, J. S. 1981. Carbon monoxide metabolism in roadside soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41, 1192-1201.
    • Tarr, M. A., Miller, W. L. and Zepp, R. G. 1995. Direct carbon monoxide photoproduction from plant matter. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 11403-11413.
    • United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1994. Keys to soil taxonomy, 6th edition. Pocahontas, Blacksburg Virginia.
    • Yonemura, S., Kawashima, S. and Tsuruta, H. 1999. Continuous measurements of CO and H2 deposition velocities onto an andisol: uptake control by soil moisture. T ellus 51B, 688-700.
    • Zepp, R. G., Miller, W. L., Burke, R. A., Parsons, D. A. B. and Scholes, M. C. 1996. EVects moisture and burning on soil-atmosphere exchange of trace carbon gases in southern African savannah. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 23699-23706.
    • Zepp, R. G., Miller, W. L., Tarr, M. A. and Burke, R. A. 1997. Soil-atmosphere fluxes of carbon monoxide during early stages of postfire succession in upland canadian boreal forests. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 29,301-29,311.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from