Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kostopoulou, E.; Tolika, K.; Tegoulias, I.; Giannakopoulos, C.; Somot, S.; Anagnostopoulou, C.; Maheras, P. (2009)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Climate model data provide large, dense coverage and long time-series, characteristics that are advantageous in the study of climate. However, it is not recommended that such data be used in any region without prior evaluation of their reliability based on comparisons with in situ observations. In this study, the accuracy of maximum and minimum temperature data from the ALADIN-Climate regional climate model (with a 25-km horizontal resolution driven at the lateral boundaries by the ERA-40 reanalysis) have been assessed for 53 stations across the Balkan Peninsula. The model temperatures corresponding to each station were extracted from their nearest land grids. The model data were first compared with observations and subsequently examined for their ability to identify extreme temperature events. In general, the model was found to be quite accurate in describing the seasonal cycle, as well as simulating the spatial distribution of temperature. Simulations were more realistic for stations along coastlines, highlighting the constraints of the topographic forcing in the simulations. Assessing the performance of the model to determine extremes (warm and cold spells), it was found to be better at detecting cold spells and has a tendency toward overestimating the frequency of occurrence of warm spells, particularly in summer.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexandersson, H. 1986. A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data. J. Clim., 6, 661-675.
    • Bengtsson, L., Hagemann, S. and Hodges, K. I. 2004a. Can climate trends be computed from reanalysis data? J. Geophys. Res., 109, D11111, doi:10.1029/2004JD004536.
    • Bengtsson, L., Hodges, K. I. and Hagemann, S. 2004b. Sensitivity of the ERA40 reanalysis to the observing system: determination of the global atmospheric circulation from reduced observations. Tellus 56A, 456-471.
    • Bromwich, D. H. and Fogt, R. L. 2004. Strong trends in the skill of the ERA-40 and NCEP-NCAR reanalyses in the high and midlatitudes of the Southern Hemisphere, 1958-2001. J. Clim., 17, 4603-4619.
    • Christensen, J. H., Machenhauer, B., Jones, R. G., Scha¨r, C., Ruti, P. and co-authors. 1997. Validation of present-day regional climate simulations over Europe: LAM simulations with observed boundary conditions. Clim. Dyn. 13, 489-506.
    • Decharme, B. and Douville, H., 2007. Global validation of the ISBA sub-grid hydrology. Clim. Dyn., 29, 21-37, doi:10.1007/s00382-006- 0216-7.
    • De´que´, M. 2007. Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: model results and statistical correction according to observed values. Glob. Planet. Change, 57, 16-26.
    • De´que´, M. and Somot, S. 2007. Variable resolution versus limited area modelling: perfect model approach. In: Research Activities in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modelling Report No.37. April 2007, 3.03-3.04, CAS/JSC Working Group on Numerical Experimentation. Available online at: http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/science/wgne/index. html.
    • De´que´, M. Jones, R. G., Wild, M., Giorgi, F., Christensen, J. H. and co-authors. 2005. Global high resolution versus Limited Area Model climate change projections over Europe: quantifying confidence level from PRUDENCE results. Clim. Dyn. 25, 653-670.
    • Douville, H., Planton, S., Royer, J. F., Stephenson, D. B., Tyteca, S. and co-authors. 2000. The importance of vegetation feedbacks in doubledCO2 time-slice experiments. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14 841-14 861.
    • Giorgi, F., Bi, X. and Pal, J. S. 2004. Mean interannual variability and trends in a regional climate change experiment over Europe, I: presentday climate (1961-1990). Clim. Dyn. 22, 733-756.
    • Good, P., Giannakopoulos, C., Flocas, H., Tolika, K., Anagnostopoulou, C. and co-authors. 2008. Significant changes in the regional climate of the Aegean during 1961-2002. Int. J. Climatol., 28, 1735-1749.
    • Hertzog, A., Basdevant, C. and Vial, F. 2006. An assessment of ECMWF and NCEP-NCAR Reanalyses in the southern hemisphere at the end of the presatellite era: results from the EOLE experiment (1971-72). Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 3367-3383.
    • Jacob, D., Ba¨rring, L., Christensen, O. B., Christensen, J. H. and coauthors. 2007. An inter-comparison of regional climate models for Europe: model performance in Present-Day Climate. Clim. Change, 81, 31-52, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9213-4.
    • Jones, P. D. 1999. The instrumental data record: its accuracy and use in attempts to identify the 'CO2 signal'. In: Analysis of Climate Variability (eds. H. von Storch and A. Navarra). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 53-76.
    • Jones, P. D. and Lister, D. H. 2007. Intercomparison of four different Southern Hemisphere sea level pressure datasets. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L10704, doi:10.1029/2007GL029251.
    • Jones, P. D., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Hulme, M., Parker, D. E., and co-authors. 1999. The use of indices to identify changes in climatic extremes. Clim. Change, 42, 131-149.
    • Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D. and coauthors., 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437-471.
    • Kendall, M. and Gibbons, J. D. 1990. Rank Correlation Methods. 5th Edition. Oxford University Press, New York, 260 pp.
    • Kharin, V. V. and Zwiers, F. W., 2000. Changes in the extremes in an ensemble of transient climate simulation with a coupled atmosphereocean GCM. J. Clim., 13, 3760-3788.
    • Kistler, R., Kalnay, E., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G. and coauthors. 2001. The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 247- 267.
    • Kjellstro¨m, E., Do¨scher, R. and Meier, H. E. M. 2005. Atmospheric response to different sea surface temperatures in the Baltic Sea: coupled versus uncoupled regional climate model experiments. Nord. Hydrol. 36, 397-409.
    • Kostopoulou, E. and Jones, P. D. 2007a. Comprehensive analysis of the climate variability in the eastern Mediterranean, part I: map pattern classification. Int. J. Climatol. 27, 1189-1214.
    • Kostopoulou, E. and Jones, P. D. 2007b. Comprehensive analysis of the climate variability in the eastern Mediterranean, part II: relationships between atmospheric circulation patterns and surface climatic elements. Int. J. Climatol. 27, 1351-1371.
    • Lo´pez-Moreno, J. I., Goyette, S. and Beniston, M. 2008. Climate change prediction over complex areas: spatial variability of uncertainties and expected changes over the Pyrenees from a set of regional climate models. Int. J. Climatol. 28, 1535-1550.
    • Lucas-Picher, P., Caya, D., de Elia, R. and Laprise, R. 2008. Investigation of regional climate models internal variability with a ten-member ensemble of 10-year simulations over a large domain. Clim. Dyn. 31, 927-940.
    • Moberg, A. and Jones, P. D. 2004. Regional Climate Models simulations of daily maximum and minimum near-surface temperatures across Europe compared with observed station data for 1961-1990. Clim. Dyn. 23, 695-715.
    • Radu, R., De´que´, M. and Somot, S. 2008. Spectral nudging in a spectral regional climate model. Tellus 60A, 885-897. doi:10.1111/j.1600- 0870.2008.00343.x.
    • Reid, P. A., Jones, P. D., Brown, O., Goodess, C. M. and Davies, T. D. 2001. Assessments of the reliability of NCEP circulation and relationships with surface climate by direct comparisons with station based data. Clim. Res. 17, 247-261.
    • Rusticucci, M. M. and Kousky, E. 2002. A comparative study of maximum and minimum temperatures over Argentina: NCEP-NCAR reanalysis versus station data. J. Clim. 15, 2089-2101.
    • Seneviratne, S. I., Lu¨thi, D., Litschi, M. and Christoph Scha¨r, C., 2006. Land-atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe. Nature 443, 205-209.
    • Simmons, A. J. and Gibson, J. K. 2000. The ERA-40 Project Plan. In: ERA-40 Project Rep Series 1. ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, United Kingdom, 63 pp.
    • Simmons, A. J., Jones, P. D., da Costa Bechtold, V., Beljaars, A. C. M., Ka˚llberg, P. W., and co-authors. 2004. Comparison of trends and low-frequency variability in CRU, ERA-40, and NCEP-NCAR analyses of surface air temperature. J. Geophys. Res. 109, D24115, doi:10.1029/2004JD005306.
    • Somot, S., Sevault, F., De´que´, M. and Cre´pon, M. 2008. 21st century climate change scenario for the Mediterranean using a coupled atmosphere-ocean regional climate model. Global Planet. Change 63, 112-126, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.10.003
    • Uppala, S. M., Ka˚llberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., da Costa Bechtold, V., and co-authors. 2005. The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2961-3012, doi:10.1256/qj.04.176.
    • Zhao, T. and FU, C. 2006. Comparison of products from ERA-40, NCEP2, and CRU with station data for summer precipitation over China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 23, 593-604.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from