LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dowsley, Martha (2009)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Polar Research
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Environmental change has stressed wildlife co-management systems in the Arctic because parameters are changing more rapidly than traditional scientific monitoring can accommodate. Co-management systems have also been criticized for not fully integrating harvesters into the local management of resources. These two problems can be approached through the use of spatiallydefined human social units termed community clusters, which are based on the demographic or ecological units being managed. An examination of polar bear management in Nunavut Territory, Canada, shows that community clusters provide a forum to collect and analyse traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) over a geographic area that mirrors the management unit, providing detailed information of local conditions. This case study also provides examples of how instituting community clusters at a governance level provides harvesters with social space in which to develop their roles as managers, along the continuum from being powerless spectators to active, adaptive co-managers. Five steps for enhancing co-management systems through the inclusion of community clusters and their knowledge are: (1) the acceptance of TEK, science, the precautionary principle and the right of harvesters not to be constrained by overly-conservative management decisions; (2) data collection involving TEK and science, and a collaboration between the two; (3) institutionalization of community clusters for data collection; (4) institutionalization of community clusters in the management process; and (5) grass-roots initiatives to take advantage of the social space provided by the community cluster approach, in order to adapt the management to local conditions, and to effect policy changes at higher levels, so as to better meet local objectives.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aars J., Lunn N.J. & Derocher A.E. (eds.) 2006. Polar bears: proceedings of the 14th Working Meeting of the IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group, 20-24 June 2005, Seattle, Washington, USA. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
    • Amstrup S. 1995. Movements, distribution, and population dynamics of polar bears in the Beaufort Sea. PhD thesis, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.
    • Amstrup S.C., McDonald T.L. & Durner G.M. 2004. Using satellite radiotelemetry data to delineate and manage wildlife populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 661-679.
    • Armitage D.R. 2005. Community-based narwhal management in Nunavut, Canada: change, uncertainty, and adaptation. Society and Natural Resources 18, 715-731.
    • Berkes F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18, 621-630.
    • Berkes F., Berkes M.K. & Fast H. 2007. Collaborative integrated management in Canada's North: the role of local and traditional knowledge and community-based monitoring. Coastal Management 35, 143-162.
    • Berkes F. & Jolly D. 2002. Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conservation Ecology 5(2), article no. 18.
    • Berman M. & Kofinas G. 2004. Hunting for models: grounded and rational choice approaches to analyzing climate effects on subsistence hunting in an Arctic community. Ecological Economics 49, 31-46.
    • Bethke R., Taylor M., Amstrup S. & Messier F. 1996. Population delineation of polar bears using satellite collar data. Ecological Applications 6, 311-317.
    • Born E.W. 2005. An assessment of the effects of hunting and climate on walruses in Greenland. PhD thesis, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo.
    • Born E.W., Wiig Ø. & Thomassen J. 1997. Seasonal and annual movements of radio collared polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in northeast Greenland. Journal of Marine Systems 10, 67-77.
    • Carlsson L. & Berkes F. 2005. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75, 65-76.
    • Cash D.W., Adger W.N., Berkes F., Garden P., Lebel L., Olsson P., Pritchard L. & Young O. 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11(2), article no. 8.
    • Chan H.M., Fediuk K., Hamilton S., Rostas L., Caughey A., Kuhnlein H., Egeland G. & Loring E. 2006. Food security in Nunavut, Canada: barriers and recommendations. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 65, 416- 431.
    • Clark T.W. 2000. Interdisciplinary problem solving in endangered species conservation: the Yellowstone grizzly bear case. In R.P. Reading & B.J. Miller (eds.): Endangered animals. Pp. 285-301 Westport, CT.: Greenwood.
    • Davis C. 1999. A case study of polar bear co-management in the eastern Canadian Arctic. Master's thesis, Dept. of Geography, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
    • Derocher A.E. 1995. Estimation of polar bear population size and survival in western Hudson Bay. Journal of Wildlife Management 59, 215-221.
    • Derocher A.E., Lunn N.J. & Stirling I. 2004. Polar bears in a warming climate. Integrative and Comparative Biology 44, 163-176.
    • Dowsley M. 2007. Inuit perspectives on polar bears (Ursus maritimus) and climate change in Baffin Bay, Nunavut, Canada. Research and Practice in Social Sciences 2(2), 53- 74.
    • Dowsley M. & Taylor M.K. 2006a. Community consultations with Qikiqtarjuaq, Clyde River and Pond Inlet on management concerns for the Baffin Bay (BB) polar bear population: a summary of Inuit knowledge and community consultations. Final Wildlife Report 2. Iqaluit, NU: Dept. of Environment, Government of Nunavut.
    • Dowsley M. & Taylor M.K. 2006b. Management consultations for the western Hudson Bay (WH) polar bear population (01-02 December 2005). Final Wildlife Report 3. Iqaluit, NU: Dept. of Environment, Government of Nunavut.
    • Dowsley M. & Wenzel W. 2008. “The time of the most polar bears”: a co-management conflict in Nunavut. Arctic 61, 77-89.
    • Duhaime G., Chabot M. & Gaudreault M. 2002. Food consumption patterns and socioeconomic factors among the Inuit of Nunavik. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 41, 91-118.
    • Dumas J.A., Flato G.M. & Brown R.D. 2006. Future projections of landfast ice thickness and duration in the Canadian Arctic. Journal of Climate 19, 5175-5189.
    • Dunlap E. & Tang C.C.L. 2006. Modelling the mean circulation of Baffin Bay. Atmosphere-Ocean 44, 9-110.
    • Durner G.M. & Amstrup S.C. 1995. Movements of a polar bear from northern Alaska to northern Greenland. Arctic 48, 338-341.
    • Environment Canada 2008. A Canadian approach to the precautionary approach/principle. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ec.gc.ca/econom/pp_e.htm on 7 December 2008.
    • Fabricius C., Folke C., Cundill G. & Schultz L. 2007. Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society 12(1), article no. 29.
    • Ferguson M.A.D., Williamson R.G. & Messier F. 1998. Inuit knowledge of long-term changes in a population of Arctic tundra caribou. Arctic 51, 201-219.
    • Ferguson S.H., Stirling I. & McLoughlin P. 2005. Climate change and ringed seal (Phoca hispida) recruitment in western Hudson Bay. Marine Mammal Science 21, 121- 135.
    • Fernandez-Gimenez M.E., Huntington H.P. & Frost K.J. 2006. Integration or co-optation? Traditional knowledge and science in the Alaska Beluga Whale Committee. Environmental Conservation 33, 306-315.
    • Fikkan A., Osherenko G. & Arikainen A. 1993. Polar bears: the importance of simplicity. In O.R. Young & G. Osherenko (eds.): Polar politics: creating international environmental regimes. Pp. 96-151. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    • Folke C. & Gunderson L. 2006. Facing change through social-ecological research. Ecology and Society 11(2), article no. 43.
    • Folke C., Fabricius C., Cundill G. & Schulze L. 2005. Communities, ecosystems and livelihoods. In D. Capistrano et al. (eds.): Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments. Vol. 4. Pp. 261-277. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
    • Ford J., Pearce T., Smit B., Wandel J., Allurut M., Shappa K., Ittusugurat H. & Qrunnut K. 2007. Reducing vulnerability to climate change in the Arctic: the case of Nunavut, Canada. Arctic 60, 150-166.
    • Fraser D.J., Coon T, Prince M.R., Dion R. & Bernatchez L. 2006. Integrating traditional and evolutionary knowledge in biodiversity conservation: a population level case study. Ecology and Society 11(2), article no. 4.
    • Freeman M.M.R. & Wenzel G.W. 2006. The nature and significance of polar bear conservation hunting in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 59, 21-30.
    • Furnell D.J. & Schweinsburg R.E. 1984. Population dynamics of central Arctic polar bears. Journal of Wildlife Management 48, 722-728.
    • Gearheard S., Matumeak W., Angutikjuaq I., Maslanik J., Huntington H.P., Leavitt J., Kagak D.M., Tigullaraq G. & Barry R.G. 2006. “It's not that simple”: a collaborative comparison of sea ice environments, their uses, observed changes, and adaptations in Barrow, Alaska, USA, and Clyde River, Nunavut, Canada. Ambio 35, 203- 211.
    • Gilchrist G., Mallory M. & Merkel F. 2005. Can local ecological knowledge contribute to wildlife management? Case studies from migratory birds. Ecology and Society 10(1), article no. 20.
    • Government of Nunavut 2005a. Polar bear management memorandum of understanding between Nativak HTO (Qikiqtarjuaq), Namautaq HTO (Clyde River), Mittimatalik HTO (Pond Inlet), Qikiqtaaluk Wildlife Board and the Department of Environment for the Management of the “Baffin Bay” polar bear population. 9 March. Iqaluit, NU: Government of Nunavut.
    • Government of Nunavut 2005b. Polar bear management memorandum of understanding between Arviat HTO, Baker Lake HTO, Aqigiq HTO (Chesterfield Inlet), Aqiggiaq HTO (Rankin Inlet), Issatik HTO (Whale Cove), Kivalliq Wildlife Board and the Department of Environment for the Management of the “western Hudson” polar bear population. 9 March. Iqaluit, NU: Government of Nunavut.
    • Grebmeier J.M., Cooper L.W., Feder H.M. & Sirenko B.I. 2006. Ecosystem dynamics of the Pacific-influenced northern Bering and Chukchi seas in the Amerasian Arctic. Progress in Oceanography 71, 331-361.
    • Hinzman L.D., Bettez N.D., Bolton W.R, Chapin F.S. III, Dyurgerov M.B., Fastie C.L., Griffith B., Hollister R.D., Hope A., Huntington H.P., Jensen A.M., Jia G.J., Jorgenson T., Kane D.L., Klein D.R., Kofinas G., Lynch A.H., Lloyd A.H., McGuire A.D., Nelson F.E., Oechel W.C., Osterkamp T.E., Racine C.H., Romanovsky V.E., Stone R.S., Stow D.A., Sturm M., Tweedie C.E., Vourlitis G.L., Walker M.D., Walker D.A., Webber P.J., Welker J.M., Winker K. & Yoshikawa K. 2005. Evidence and implications of recent climate change in northern Alaska and other Arctic regions. Climatic Change 72, 251- 298.
    • Holling C.S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4, 390-405.
    • Huntington H.P. 2000. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10, 1270-1274.
    • Huntington H.P. & the communities of Buckland, Elim, Koyuk, Point Lay & Shaktoolik. 1999. Traditional knowledge of the ecology of beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) in the eastern Chukchi and northern Bering seas, Alaska. Arctic 52, 49-61.
    • Johannes R.E., Freeman M.M.R. & Hamilton R.J. 2000. Ignore fishers' knowledge and miss the boat. Fish and Fisheries 1, 257-271.
    • Keith D. 2005. Inuit Qaujimaningit Nanurnut/Inuit knowledge of polar bears. Edmonton, AB: Canadian Circumpolar Institute.
    • Kendrick A., P.O. Lyver & Łutsël K'é Dene First Nation 2005. Denéso.liné (Chipewyan) knowledge of barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) movements. Arctic 58, 175-191.
    • Kiliaan H.P.L., Stirling I. & Jonkel C. 1978. Polar bears in the area of Jones Sound and Norwegian Bay. Progress Notes 88. Ottawa: Canadian Wildlife Service.
    • Krupnik I. & Jolly D. (eds.) 2002. The Earth is faster now: indigenous observations of Arctic environmental change. Fairbanks: Arctic Research Consortium of the United States.
    • Laidler G.J. 2006. Inuit and scientific perspectives on the relationship between sea ice and climate change: the ideal complement? Climatic Change 78, 407-444.
    • Laidre K.L. & Heide-Jørgensen M.P. 2005. Arctic sea ice trends and narwhal vulnerability. Biological Conservation 121, 509-517.
    • Langdon S.J. 1991. The integration of cash and subsistence in southwest Alaska Yup'ik Eskimo communities. Senri Ethnological Studies 30, 269-291.
    • Larsen T. 1985. Abundance, range, and population biology of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area. PhD thesis, University of Oslo.
    • Learmonth L.A., MacLeod C.D., Santors M.B., Pierce G.J., Crick H.Q.P. & Robinson R.A. 2006. Potential effects of climate change on marine mammals. Oceanography and Marine Biology 44, 431-464.
    • Lentfer J.W. 1974a. Agreement on the conservation of polar bears. Polar Record 17, 327-330.
    • Lentfer J.W. 1974b. Discreteness of Alaskan polar bear populations. In I. Kjerner & P. Bjurholm (eds.): XIth International Congress of Game Biologists, Stockholm, September 3-7, 1973. Pp. 323-329. Stockholm: Swedish National Environment Protection Board.
    • Lentfer J.W. 1983. Alaskan polar bear movements from mark-recapture. Arctic 36, 282-288.
    • Lunn N.J., Stirling I. & Andriashek D. 1995. Movements and distribution of polar bears in the northeastern Beaufort Sea and M'Clure Strait. Final Report by the Canadian Wildlife Service to the Inuvialuit Wildlife Management Advisory Committee. Inuvik, NT: Canadian Wildlife Service.
    • MacPherson A. & Jonkel C. 1970. Polar bear management changes in Canada. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Working Meeting of the Polar Bear Specialists organized by IUCN at Morges, Switzerland 2-4 February, 1970. Pp. 12-14. Morges, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
    • Mallory M.L., Gilchrist H.G., Fontaine A.J. & Akearok J.A. 2003. Local ecological knowledge of ivory gull declines in Arctic Canada. Arctic 56, 293-298.
    • McDonald M., Arragutainaq L. & Novalinga Z. (eds.) 1997. Voices from the bay: traditional ecological knowledge of Inuit and Cree in the Hudson Bay bioregion. Ottawa: Canadian Arctic Resources Committee and Municipality of Sanikiluaq.
    • Messier F., Taylor M.K., Plante A. & Romito T. 2001. Atlas of polar bear movements in Nunavut, Northwest Territories and neighbouring areas. Saskatoon, SK: University of Saskatchewan and Nunavut Wildife Services.
    • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
    • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2005. Our human planet: summary for decision makers. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
    • Moller H., Berkes F., Lyver P.O. & Kislalioglu M. 2004. Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for co-management. Ecology and Society 9(3), article no. 2.
    • Molnár P.K., Derocher A.E., Lewis M.A. & Taylor M.K. 2008. Modelling the mating system of polar bears: a mechanistic approach to the Allee effect. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275, 217-226.
    • Moore S.E. & Laidre K.L. 2006. Trends in sea ice cover within habitats used by bowhead whales in the western Arctic. Ecological Applications 16, 932-944.
    • Nadasdy P. 2003. Reevaluating the co-management success story. Arctic 56, 367-380.
    • NTI (Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated) 2000. Nunavut Land Claims Agreement. Iqaluit, NU: Dept. of Communications, Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated.
    • NTI (Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated) 2007. NTI preliminary western Hudson Bay Inuit Qaujimatuqangit workshop summary. Submitted for consideration at a public hearing of the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board, 20 April 2007.
    • Paetkau D., Amstrup S.C., Born E.W., Calvert W., Derocher A.E., Garner G.W., Messier F., Stirling I., Taylor M.K., Wiig Ø. & Strobeck C. 1999. Genetic structure of the world's polar bear populations. Molecular Ecology 8, 1571-1584.
    • Parlee B., Manseau M. & Łutsël K'é Dene First Nation 2005. Using traditional knowledge to adapt to ecological change: Denésołiné monitoring of caribou movements. Arctic 58, 26-37.
    • Pars T., Osler M. & Bjerregaard P. 2001. Contemporary use of traditional and imported food among Greenlandic Inuit. Arctic 54, 22-31.
    • Peters E.J. 2003. Views of traditional ecological knowledge in co-management bodies in Nunavik, Quebec. Polar Record 39, 49-60.
    • Plummer R. & Armitage D.R. 2007. Charting the new territory of adaptive co-management: a Delphi study. Ecology and Society 12(2), article no. 10.
    • Prestrud P. & Stirling I. 1994. The International Polar Bear Agreement and the current status of polar bear conservation. Aquatic Mammals 20, 113-124.
    • Reeves R.R. 1993. The commerce in maktaq at Arctic Bay, northern Baffin Island, NWT. Arctic Anthropology 30, 79-93.
    • Regehr E.V., Amstrup S.C. & Stirling I. 2006. Polar bear population status in the southern Beaufort Sea. Open-File Report 2006-1337. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
    • Regehr E.V., Lunn N.J., Amstrup S.C. & Stirling I. 2007. Effects of earlier sea ice break-up on survival and population size of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 2673-2638.
    • Schliebe S., Wiig Ø., Derocher A. & Lunn N. 2006. Ursus maritimus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2007. Accessed on the internet at http://www.iucnredlist.org on 12 January 2009.
    • Schweinsburg R.E. 1981. A brief history of polar bear management in the NWT. Northwest Territories Wildlife Notes 2, 1-5.
    • Schweinsburg R.E., Furnell D.J. & Miller S.J. 1981. Abundance, distribution, and population structure of polar bears in the lower Central Arctic Islands. Wildlife Service Completion Report No. 2. Yellowknife: Government of the Northwest Territories.
    • Schweinsburg R.E. & Lee L.J. 1982. Movement of four satellite monitored bears in Lancaster Sound, Northwest Territories. Arctic 35, 504-511.
    • Schweinsburg R.E., Lee L.J. & Latour P.B. 1982. Distribution, movement, and abundance of polar bears in Lancaster Sound, Northwest Territories. Arctic 35, 159-169.
    • Sejersen F. 2001. Hunting and management of beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) in Greenland: changing strategies to cope with new national and local interests. Arctic 54, 431-443.
    • Serreze M.C., Holland M.M. & Stroeve J. 2007. Perspectives on the Arctic's shrinking sea-ice cover. Science 315, 1533-1536.
    • Simmonds M.P. & Isaac S.J. 2007. The impacts of climate change on marine mammals: early signs of significant problems. Oryx 41, 19-26.
    • Smith P.A. & Jonkel C.J. 1976. Resume of the trade in polar bears hides in Canada, 1973-74. In: Polar bears: proceedings of the Fifth Working Meeting of the Polar Bear Specialist Group. Pp. 68-73. Morges, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
    • Smith T.G. & Wright H. 1989. Economic status and role of hunters in a modern Inuit village. Polar Record 25, 93-98.
    • Stirling I. 1988. The polar bear. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    • Stirling I., Calvert W., Schweinsburg R.E., Kolenosky G.B., Shoesmith M., Smith B., Juniper I., Luttich S. & Lee L.J. 1984. Polar bear management in Canada 1980-82. Appendix 1. In: Polar bears: proceedings of the Technical Workshop of the IUCN Polar Bear Specialists Group. Grand Canyon, Arizona 16-18 February 1983. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
    • Stirling I. & Derocher A. 1993. Possible impacts of climatic warming on polar bears. Arctic 46, 240-245.
    • Stirling I. & Kiliaan H.P. 1980. Population ecology studies of the polar bear in northern Labrador. Canadian Wildlilfe Service Occasional Report No. 42. Edmonton: Canadian Wildlife Service.
    • Stirling I., Lunn N.J. & Iacozza J. 1999. Long-term trends in the population ecology of polar bears in western Hudson Bay in relation to climatic change. Arctic 52, 294-306.
    • Stirling I. & MacPherson A. 1972. Polar bear management in Canada. In: Polar bears: proceedings of the Third Working Meeting of Polar Bear Specialists. Pp. 54-59. Morges, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
    • Stirling I. & Parkinson C.L. 2006. Possible effects of climatic warming on selected populations of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 59, 261-275.
    • Taylor M.K., Akeeaguk S., Andriashek D., Barbour W., Born E.W., Calvert W., Cluff H.D., Ferguson S., Laake J., Rosing-Asvid A., Stirling I. & Messier F. 2001. Delineating Canadian and Greenland polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations by cluster analysis of movements. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 690-709.
    • Taylor M.K., Laake J., McLoughlin P.D., Born E.W., Cluff H.D., Ferguson S.H., Rosing-Asvid A., Schweinsburg R. & Messier F. 2005. Demography and viability of a hunted population of polar bears. Arctic 58, 203-214.
    • Taylor M. K., Laake J, McLoughlin P.D., Cluff E.W. & Messier F. 2006. Demographic parameters and harvest-explicit population viability analysis for polar bears in M'Clintock Channel, Nunavut. Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1667-1673.
    • Taylor M.K. & Lee J. 1995. Distribution and abundance of Canadian polar bear populations: a management perspective. Arctic 48, 147-154.
    • Tynan C.T. & DeMaster D.P. 1997. Observations and predictions of Arctic climatic change: potential effects on marine mammals. Arctic 50, 308-322.
    • Usher P. 2000. Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 53, 183-193.
    • Wenzel G.W. 1983. Inuit and polar bears: cultural observation from a hunt near Resolute Bay, N.W.T. Arctic 36, 90-94.
    • Wenzel G.W. 2004. From TEK to IQ: Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit and Inuit cultural ecology. Arctic Anthropology 41, 238-250.
    • Wenzel G.W. 2005. Nunavut Inuit and polar bear: the cultural politics of the sport hunt. Senri Ethnological Studies 67, 363-388.
    • White G. 2006. Cultures in collision: traditional knowledge and Euro-Canadian governance processes in Northern land-claim boards. Arctic 59, 401-414.
    • Wiig Ø. 1995. Distribution of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area. Journal of Zoology (London) 237, 515- 529.
    • Wilson J. 2002. Scientific uncertainty, complex systems, and the design of common-pool institutions. In E. Ostrom et al. (eds.): The drama of the commons. Pp. 327-359. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
    • Woo M-K, Modeste P., Martz L., Blondin J., Kouchtubajda B., Tutcho D., Gyakum K., Takazo A., Spence C., Tutcho J., Di Cenzo P., Kenny G., Stone J., Neyelle I., Baptiste G., Modeste M., Kenny B. & Modeste W. 2007. Science meets traditional knowledge: water and climate in the Sahtu (Great Bear Lake) region, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic 60, 37-46.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from