LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mehus, Grete; Germeten, Sidsel; Henriksen, Nils (2012)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: International Journal of Circumpolar Health
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: snowmobiling, risk, communication, focus group, injury prevention
Objectives. This study aims to understand how the risks of snowmobiling are communicated among northern Norwegian youths. Study design. A qualitative design with focus group interviews was chosen. Interviews centred on safety precautions and estimation of risks related to snowmobiling and driving patterns. Methods. Eighty-one students (31 girls and 50 boys) aged between 16 and 23 years from 8 high schools were interviewed in 17 focus groups that were segregated by gender. Interview data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results. Boys and girls communicated differently about risks. Peer-group conformity appeared stronger among boys than girls. Boys did not spontaneously relate risks to their snowmobile activities, while girls did. Boys focused upon training, coping and balance between control and lack of control while driving. Girls talked about risks, were aware of risks and sought to avoid risky situations, in contrast to boys. Boys’ risk communication in groups was about how to manage challenging situations. Their focus overall was on trying to maintain control while simultaneously testing their limits. Three risk categories emerged: those who drive as they ought to (mostly girls), those who occasionally take some risks (boys and girls) and those who are extreme risk-takers (a smaller number of boys). Conclusions. Perceptions of and communication about risk are related to gender, peer group and familiarity with risk-taking when snowmobiling. Northern Norwegian boys’ driving behaviour highlights a specific need for risk reduction, but this must also draw upon factors such as acceptance of social and cultural codes and common sense related to snowmobiling.(Int J Circumpolar Health 2011; 70(2):205–214)Keywords: snowmobiling, risk, communication, focus group, injury prevention
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Mehus AG, Mehus G, Germeten S. Delrapport 1: Snøscooter og trafikksikkerhet - litteraturgjennom - gang av kunnskap knyttet til snøscooterulykker i Skandinavia, USA og Canada [Snowmobiles and trafcif safety - a review of literature connected to snow - mobile accidents in Scandinavia, USA and Canada].Alta: Høgskolen i Finnmark 2008, Report No. 4. 43 p. [in Norwegian]
    • 2. Pedersen K. Med snøscooter som livsform [With snowmobile as lifestyle]. In: Pedersen K, Gerrard S. Kjønn, kultur og regional endring. Nye perspektiver på distriktskvinneforskning [Gender, culture and regional variation. New perspectives on rural women]. Rapport nr. 6. Alta: Alta Laererhøgskole, Finnmarksforskning, NIBR og Finnmark distriktshøgskole; 1992. p. 110-126. [in Norwegian]
    • 3. Mehus G, Germeten S, Henriksen N. Snøscooterkjø- ring og scooterfeelingen [Youth, snowmobiling and the “snowmobile feeling”]. Tidskrift for ungdomsforskning 2010;10(2):39-56. [in Norwegian]
    • 4. Telseth F. Dra på. Bidrag til en forståelse av frikjørerens og frikjøringsfenomenets meningsdimensjoner [Push it. A contribution towards understanding the free-driving phenomenon]. Bø in Telemark: Høgskolen i Telemark; 2005. 152 p. [in Norwegian]
    • 5. Breivik G. Risikoatferd og jakten på spenning [Risk behavior and chasing action]. In:Thelle DS, Breivik G, Enebakk V, Skolbekken JA, Teigen KH, editor. På den usikre siden [On the risky side]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske forlag; 2001. p. 133-158. [in Norwegian]
    • 6. Lov om motorferdsel i utmark og vassdrag. LOV1977-06-10-82 (Jun 10, 1977). [Motor Traffic on Un - cultivated Land and in Watercourses Act of 1977, Pub. L. 82 Stat. 1977] [cited 2011 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.lovdata.no/all/nl-19770610-082.html. [in Norwegian]
    • 7. Vegtrafikkloven. LOV-1965-06-18-4 (Jun 18, 1965). [Road Traffic Act of 1965, Pub. L. 4. 1965 Stat. 1965.] [cited 2011 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.lovdata.no/all/nl-19650618-004.html. [in Norwegian]
    • 8. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Befolkningsstatistikk [Statistics Norway, Population in North Troms and Finnmark Jan 1, 2010]. Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå; 2010 [cited 2010 Nov 17.] Available from: http://www.ssb.no/folkemengde. [in Norwegian]
    • 9. Fylkesmannen i Finnmark. Snøscooter- og barmarksløyper i Finnmark - kart og GPS [Snowmobile- and dryland tracks in Finnmark - maps and GPS]. Vadsø: Fylkesmannen i Finnmark; 2009 [cited 2010 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.fylkesmannen.no/fagom.as px?m=1983&amid=1057613. [in Norwegian]
    • 10. Fylkesmannen i Troms. Snøscooterløyper i Troms [Snowmobile tracks in Troms] . Tromsø: Fylkesmannen i Troms; 2010 [cited 2010 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.fylkesmannen.no/fagom.aspx?m=19028&a mid=1271904. [in Norwegian]
    • 11. Uttrekk fra det Sentrale Motorvognregister [Statistics ordered from Central Motor Registry, Norway]. Oslo: Sentrale Motorvognregister; 2008 Dec 31. [in Norwegian]
    • 12. Ytterstad B, Dahlberg T. Snøscooterskader på Svalbard [Snowmobile injuries in Svalbard].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2005;125(23):3252-3255. [in Norwegian]
    • 13. Jeppesen E,Wisborg T. Skader fra bruk av snøscootere i Vest-Finnmark [Snowmobiles and serious injuries in western Finnmark].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2005;125 (23): 3248-3251. [in Norwegian]
    • 14. Featherstone M. Undoing culture: globalisation, postmodernism and identity. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 1995. 178 p.
    • 15. Hvalstad M. Gutter i et komplisert samfunn [Boys in a complex society]. In: Haavet OR, editor. Ungdomsmedisin [Youth Medicine]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2005. p. 82-85. [in Norwegian]
    • 16. Douglas M. Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1985. 115 p.
    • 17. Tulloch J, Lupton D. Risk and everyday life. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 2003. 137 p.
    • 18. Bier VM. On the state of the art: risk communication to the public. Reliability engineering & system safety 2001;71(2):139-150.
    • 19. Nielsen B. Livsfarlig scooterkjøring i fjellet - gambler med livet [Life-threatening snowmobiling in the mountains - gambling with life]. Nordlys (newspaper) 2008 Mar 17. [in Norwegian]
    • 20. Østlyngen R. Scooterjakt på livet løs [Chasing snowmobiles at the risk of life]. Altaposten (newspaper) 2009 Jan 24. [in Norwegian]
    • 21. Csikszentmihayli M. Flow:The classic work on how to achieve happiness. London: Rider; 2002. 303 p.
    • 22. Morgan DL. Focus group interviewing. In: Gubrium Jaber G, Holstein JA, editors. Handbook of Interview Research, Context & Method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.; 2001. p. 141-160.
    • 23. Kvale S. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [The qualitative research interview]. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB; 1997. 206 p. [in Norwegian]
    • 24. Paulgaard G. Ungdom og kjønn i endring? Ungdom, humor og maskulinitet på 71 grader. [Youth and gender in change? Youth, humour and masculinity at 71 degrees North]. Maskulinitet i nord 2007;6:207-222. [in Norwegian]
    • 25. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24(2):105-112.
    • 26. Oltedal S, Rundmo T. The effects of personality and gender on risky driving behaviour and accident involvement. Safety Science 2006;44(7):621-628.
    • 27. Ulleberg P. Social inuflence from the back-seat: factors related to adolescent passenger willingness to address unsafe drivers.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2004;7(1):17-30.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from