Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Boles, Myde; Rohde, Kristen; He, Haiou; Maher, Julie E.; Stark, Michael J.; Fenaughty, Andrea; O'Connor, Tari (2009)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: International Journal of Circumpolar Health
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: smoking cessation, quitline, ethnic groups, Alaska Native people, indigenous populations

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: behavior and behavior mechanisms, population characteristics, geographic locations, social sciences
Objectives. To conduct a descriptive, comparative study of the acceptability and effectiveness of a tobacco cessation quitline (QL) among Alaska Native people and non-Alaska Native people. Study design. From January 2006 to January 2007, we conducted telephone surveys of first-time Alaska QL callers who set a quit date. We attempted to reach them by phone about 3 months after their call to the QL. Methods. Analyses compared 7-day point prevalence quit rates, satisfaction measures, experiences and general perceptions of QLs by Alaska Native and non-Alaska Native callers. Results. We surveyed 39.8% (n=772) of the 1,941 adult tobacco users we attempted to contact. The 7-day point prevalence quit rate among Alaska Native survey participants at the 3-month follow-up was 22.2% (CI: 14.8% – 32.0%), compared to 40.7% (CI: 36.7% – 44.9%) for non-Alaska Native survey participants. Eighty-three percent (CI: 74.6% – 89.3%) were somewhat/very satisfied overall with the QL program compared to 90.3% (CI: 87.6% – 92.4%) for non-Alaska Native participants. Conclusions. Although the QL was less effective for Alaska Native callers than other QL callers, Alaska Native peoples’ quit rates and satisfaction were still quite good. Despite this, more effort should be made to address specific Alaska Native values and social and cultural barriers to quitting tobacco.(Int J Circumpolar Health 2009;68(2):170–181)Keywords: smoking cessation, quitline, ethnic groups, Alaska Native people, indigenous populations
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Fagan P,k ing G, Lawrence D, Petrucci SA, Robinson RG, Banks D, et al. Eliminating tobacco-related health disparities: directions for future research. AmJPublicHealth2004;94:211-217.
    • 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults - United States 2006. MorbMortalWklyRep2007;56:1157-1161.
    • 3. Thun J, Apicella LF, Henley SJ. Smoking vs. other risk factors as the cause of smoking-attributable deaths.JAMA2000;284:706-712.
    • 4. Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. Alaska tobacco facts June 2006 update [cited 2008 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www.hss.state.ak. us/dph/chronic/tobacco/alaska_tobacco_facts.pdf.
    • 5. First Nations Center. First Nations Regional Longitudinal Health Survey (RHS) 2002/03. Results for adults, youth and children living in first nations communities. Ottawa, Canada: First Nations Centre;2005.1-322.
    • 6. Health Canada. Smoking in Canada: an overview, Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey Factsheets [cited 2008 Mar 21]. Available from: http:// www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/tobac-tabac/research-recherche/stat/_ctums-esutc_fs-if/2003-smok-fum_e.html.
    • 7. Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Tobacco Control. International indigenous tobacco control [cited 2008 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www.ceitc.org. au/international_indigenous_tobacco_control.
    • 8. Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Section of Research and Analysis [cited 2008 Apr 7]. Available from: http://almis.labor.state. ak.us/.
    • 9. Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Tedeschi GJ, Rosbrook B, Johnson CE, Byrd M, et al. Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers. N EnglJMed2002;347:1087-1093.
    • 10.Stead LF, Perera R, Lancaster T. A systematic review of interventions for smokers who contact quitlines. TobControl2007;16(SupplI):i3-i8.
    • 11. Cummins SE, Bailey L, Campbell S, k oon-k irby C, Zhu SH. Tobacco cessation quitlines in North America: a descriptive study. Tob Control 2007;16(Suppl I):i9-i15.
    • 12.Hayward LM, Campbell SH, Sutherland-Brown C. Aboriginal users of Canadian quitlines: an exploratoryanalysis.TobControl2007;16(SupplI):i60-i64.
    • 13. Maher JE, Rohdek , Dent CW, Stark MJ, Pizacani B, Boysun MJ, et al. Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations? Tob Control2007;16(SupplI):i65-i70.
    • 14. Theq uit Group and the Ministry of Health. Maori smoking and tobacco use. Fact Sheet 1. Wellington, NewZealand:MinistryofHealth;2006.
    • 15.Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clinic Tobacco q uitline [cited 2008 March 21]. Available from: http://www. mmsiservices.com/documents/MCTq EmployerBrochurerev.pdf.
    • 16.Alaska Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey [cited 2008 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www. hss.state.ak.us/dph/chronic/hsl/brfss/default.htm 17. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Measuring rurality: rural-urban commuting area codes [cited 2008 Apr 9]. Available from: http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/Rurality/Ru - ralUrbanCommutingAreas/.
    • 18.StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 9.2. CollegeStation,T x :StataCorporation;2006.
    • 19.United States Department of Health and Human Services. Tobacco use among U.S. racial/ethnic minority groups: African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on SmokingandHealth;1998.1-332.
    • 20.Renner CC, Patten CA, Enoch C, Petraitis J, Offord k P, Angstman S, et al. Focus group s of y -k Delta Alaska Natives: attitudes toward tobacco use and tobacco dependence interventions. Prev Med 2004; 38:421-431.
    • 21.Swartz SH, Cowan TM, k layman JE, Welton MT, Leonard BA. Use and effectiveness of tobacco telephone counseling and nicotine therapy in Maine. Am JPrevMed2005;29:288-294.
    • 22.Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Johnson CE, Tedeschi G, Roeseler A. A centralized telephone service for tobacco cessation: the California experience. Tobacco Control2000;9(SupplII):ii48-ii55.
    • 23.Ossip- k lein DJ, McIntosh S. q uitlines in North America: evidence base and applications. Am J Med Sci2003;326:201-205.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from