Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Schlamadinger, B.; Marland, G. (2011)
Publisher: Tellus B
Journal: Tellus B
Languages: English
Types: Article
Forests can be harvested and regrown on a sustainable basis while harvested material is used to either store carbon in long-lived wood products or to displace carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion. To frame the question whether this implies that harvesting forests is an effective strategy for mitigating the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we use a carbon accounting model to ask how long it takes to return to the original carbon balance after a forest stand is clear-cut harvested for biofuels and other forest products. Although the numerical solution depends on a great variety of site-specific model input parameters, it is clear that the system will not return to its original carbon balance for a very long time (perhaps centuries) unless forest products are produced and used efficiently. Especially when the cycle of producing forest products involves initial harvest of a forest stand with a large standing stock of biomass, there is likely to be a long-standing debit in terms of net carbon emissions to the atmosphere. On the other hand, if forest harvest is produced and used with high efficiency and the rate of regrowth is high, potential carbon benefits can be very high over time and it is possible that there is never a carbon debit with respect to forest protection, even immediately following harvest. Any intent to use forest harvesting to help mitigate the buildup of carbon dioxide in the earth's atmosphere should be able to demonstrate that the forest regrowth and product use can compensate for the loss of carbon from the forest as a result of the initial harvest.DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.00014.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, J. 1997. An inventory of data for reconstructing ''natural steady state'' carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems. http://www.esd.ornl.gov/ern/qen/carbon1.html.
    • Bird, N. 1997. Personal communication.
    • Birdsey, R. A. 1996. Regional estimates of timber volume and forest carbon for managed timberland. Appendix 4 to Forests and global change, vol. 2. Forest management opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions (eds. Sampson, R. N. and Hair, D.). American Forests, Washington DC, 20013.
    • Cooper, C. F. 1983. Carbon storage in managed forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13, 155-166.
    • Dewar, R. C. 1991. Analytical model of carbon storage in the trees, soils and wood products of managed forests. T ree Physiology 8, 239-258.
    • Harmon, M. E., Ferrell, W. K. and Franklin, J. F. 1990. EVects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247, 699-701.
    • Karjalainen, T. and Asikainen, A. 1996. Greenhouse gas emissions from the use of primary energy in forest operations and long-distance transportation of timber in Finland. Forestry 69, 216-228.
    • Marland, G. and Marland, S. 1992. Should we store carbon in trees? Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 64, 181-195.
    • Marland, G. and Schlamadinger, B. 1995. Biomass fuels and forest-management strategies: how do we calculate the greenhouse-gas emissions benefits? Energy 20, 1131-1140.
    • Marland, G., Schlamadinger, B. and Leiby, P. 1997. Forest/biomass based mitigation strategies: does the timing of carbon reductions matter? Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and T echnology 27, 213-226.
    • Nilsson, S. and Schopfhauser, W. 1995. The carbonsequestration potential of a global aVorestation program. Climatic Change 30, 267-293.
    • Price, D. T., Mair, R. M., Kurz, W. A. and Apps, M. J. 1996. EVects of forest management, harvesting and wood processing on ecosystem carbon dynamics: a boreal case study. In: Forest ecosystems, forest management and the global carbon cycle (eds. Apps, M. J. and Price, D. T.). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 279-292.
    • Schlamadinger, B., Canella, L., Marland, G. and Spitzer, J. 1998. Bioenergy strategies and the global carbon cycle. Sciences Geologiques 50, 1-4.
    • Schlamadinger, B. and Marland, G. 1996. The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass and Bioenergy 10, 275-300.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from