Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Žagar, N.; Žagar, M.; Cedilnik, J.; Gregorič, G.; Rakovec, J. (2006)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
The mesoscale numerical weather prediction model ALADIN has been applied for downscaling ERA40 data onto a 10 km grid covering the complex terrain of Slovenia. The modelled wind field is compared with the time-series of observations at 11 stations. In addition to traditional scores (root-mean-square error, mean absolute error, anomaly correlation), a frequency-domain comparison is carried out in order to explore aspects of the mesoscale model performance other than that depicted by the conventional statistics. The verification period is the Special Observing Period of the Mesoscale Alpine Program (MAP-SOP), for which ECMWF reanalyses including MAP-SOP observations are available every 3 hr on a ∼40 km grid. Traditional scores indicate that the downscaling has been successful. Scores are little dependent on the nesting strategy (direct versus two-step nesting), in spite of a ratio of horizontal resolutions between ERA40 and ALADIN as large as 12. The model performs best at mountaintop stations, characterized by over 80% of their spectral power in motions with longer than diurnal periods. A majority of stations is, however, located in the complex terrain where around 40% of the spectral wind power is contained in the subdiurnal frequency range. This part of the spectrum is significantly underestimated by the model, indicating that the downscaling is predominantly a dynamical adjustment to the new terrain. At the same time, the MAP-SOP reanalyses of the ECMWF model include relatively more power in the subdiurnal frequency range than ALADIN. However, these subdiurnal oscillations do not agree with observations and their removal improves conventional scores for the MAP-SOP wind data. It is suggested that a frequency-domain comparison is a useful complement to the conventional statistics and it enables a more physical insight into a mesoscale model performance.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Beck, A., Ahrens, B. and Stadlbacher, K. 2004. Impact of nesting strategies in dynamical downscaling of reanalysis data. Geophys. Res. Let. 31, L19101, doi:10.1029/2004GL020115.
    • Bougeault, P., Binder, P., Buzzi, A., Dirks, R., Houze, R. and co-authors. 2001. The MAP Special Observing Period. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 433-462.
    • Brzovic´, N. 1999. Factors affecting the Adriatic cyclone and associated windstorms. Contr. Atmos. Phys. 72, 51-65.
    • Bubnova, R., Hello, G., Benard, P. and Geleyn, J.-F. 1995. Integration of the fully elastic equations cast in the hydrostatic pressure terrainfollowing coordinate in the framework of the ARPEGE/ALADIN NWP system. Mon. Wea. Rev. 123, 515-535.
    • Denis, B., Larprise, R. and Caya, D. 2003. Sensitivity of a regional climate model to the resolution of the lateral boundary conditions. Clim. Dyn. 20, 107-126.
    • Ghil, M., Allen, M. R., Dettinger, M. D., Ide, K., Kondrashov, D., and co-authors. 2002. Advanced spectral methods for climatic time series. Reviews of Geophysics 40, doi:10.1029/2001RG000092.
    • Heimann, D. 2001. A model-based wind climatology of the eastern Adriatic coast. Meteorol. Z. 10, 5-16.
    • Jones, R. G., Murphy, J. M. and Noguer, M. 1995. Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional-climate model: I: assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 121, 1413-1449.
    • Ka˚llberg, P., Simmons, A., Uppala, S. and Fuentes, M. 2004. The ERA40 archive. ECMWF ERA-40 Project Report Series 17, 1-35.
    • Keil, C. and Cardinali, C. 2004. The ECMWF reanalysis of the MAP Special Observing Period. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 2827- 2849.
    • Mass, C. F., Ovens, D., Westrick, K. and Colle, B. A. 2002. Does increasing horizontal resolution produce more skillful forecast? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 83, 407-430.
    • Qian, J.-H., Seth, A. and Zebiak, S. 2003. Reinitialized versus continuous simulations for regional climate downscaling. Mon. Wea. Rev. 131, 2857-2874.
    • Rife, D. L., Davis, C. A. and Liu, Y. 2004. Predictability of low-level winds by mesoscale meteorological models. Mon. Wea. Rev. 132, 2553-2569.
    • Steinacker, R., Ha¨berli, C. and Po¨ttschacher, W. 2000. A transparent method for the analysis and quality evaluation of irregularly distributed and noisy observational data. Mon. Wea. Rev. 128, 2303- 2316.
    • Zˇ agar, M. and Rakovec, J. 1999. Small-scale surface wind prediction using dynamic adaptation. Tellus 51, 489-504.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from