LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Uljens, Michael (2015)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
This article outlines the foundations of a critical but non-affirmative educational leadership theory. The adopted approach draws on a recognition-based tradition of education and Bildung. It is argued that every theory of educational leadership must deal with two fundamental questions as well as with their internal relations. These questions are, first, how institutional education is related to politics, economy and culture in a democratic society and, second, how leadership as a professional, moral practice is explained in terms of power and influence, that is, as an ethical and epistemological relation between individuals. On the first issue, this non-affirmative educational leadership theory accepts a non-hierarchical view of the relation between societal forms of practice, thus holding to a Western democratic tradition of citizenship and social transformation. Concerning the second problem, a non-affirmative position is adopted, according to which pure intersubjective or subject-centred (egological) approaches to explaining human intentional and cultural action and consciousness are considered insufficient. Rather, a specific version of relationism is advocated. In this theory, the classical pedagogical paradox takes a new form: educational leadership now means paradoxically to recognise the Other as if he or she was already capable of what he or she might become capable of through own activity and to act accordingly.Keywords: educational leadership theory; curriculum theory; critical educationCitation: NordSTEP 2015, 1: 27010 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27010
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Benner, D. (1991). Allgemeine P¬®adagogik [General education]. Weinheim: Juventa.
    • Uljens, M. (1997). School didactics and learning. Hove: Psychology Press.
    • Uljens, M. (1998). Allm¬®an pedagogik [General education]. Lund: Studentliteratur
    • Uljens, M. (2007). Education and societal change in the global age. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Education as a societal contributor (pp. 23 51). New York: Peter Lang.
    • Uljens, M., & Nyman, C. (2013). Educational leadership in Finland or building a nation with bildung. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic model? (pp. 31 48). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article

Collected from