Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kiefer, Dale A.; Cullen, John J. (1991)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Polar Research
Languages: English
Types: Article
Numerous studies of the growth of phytoplankton in the laboratory have demonstrated the dependence of cellular pigment concentration and growth rate upon light intensity, photoperiod, temperature, and nutrient supply. These same environmental parameters vary with season in the polar seas and presumably affect the growth rate and cellular pigment concentration of the phytoplankton crop. Unfortunately, there has not been a complete mathematical description of the interaction of all four environmental parameters. This study presents an approach to describing these interactions. It can reasonably be assumed that the gross specific growth rate, g, is a function of the specific rate of light absorption. The dependent variables in this equation are g, the gross specific growth rate, ?, the maximum carbon-specific photosynthetic rate, and, ?, the ratio of carbon to chlorophyll. The value of all three dependent variables is constrained. The independent variables are E?, the light intensity (assumed constant during the photoperiod), and ?, the photoperiod (as a fraction of 24 hours) that the cells are illuminated, ? is the instantaneous capacity of the dark reactions to assimilate electrons, while the product ap?max E?/? is the instantaneous capacity of the light reactions to supply electrons. If the capacity for photochemistry exceeds the capacity for assimilation, dissipative processes occur, and the quantum yield is low. We have applied this equation to the analysis of the growth and light absorption by Skeletonema costatum cultured under light, temperature, and nutrient limitation. Decreases in nutrient supply and temperature cause decreases in ? and increases in ?; thus both the capacity for electron supply and utilisation decrease. However, decreases in temperature decrease the capacity for electron assimilation more rapidly than the capacity for supply; quantum yield drops. Decreases in nutrient supply cause the capacity for supply and assimilation to drop in parallel; quantum yeield is maintained. Decreases in day length cause decreases in ? and increases in ?. The capacity to assimilate electrons and the capacity to supply electrons increase in parallel; quantum yield is maintained. Decreases in light intensity cause decreases in both ? and the capacity to supply electrons. Although the changes in ? with light intensity arc difficult to assess, the capacity to assimilate electrons appears to be little changed by light limitation. Quantum yields increase with decreasing light levels.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Fasham. M. J . R. & Platt. T. lYX3: Photosynthetic response of phytoplanktcm to light: a physiological model. Proc. ,7. Soc. Lond. ,719. 355-370.
    • Fo!cr. C . Furhank. R . . llarhinson. J. ti Horton. P. IYYW The mcchaniimh contrihuting to photosynthetic control nf clcctron transport of carbon assimilation in leaves. Phoro. Rr,. 11.X3-ilMl.
    • Geider. R . J. lYX7: Light and temperature dependcncc of the carhon to chlorophyll a ratio in microalgac and cyanohactcria: implications for physiology and growth of phytoplankton. A'ew Phyrologsr 106. 1-34.
    • Jasshy. A . D. 8; Platt. T . 1976: Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthcsis and light for phytoplankton. Lininol. Oceanogr. 21. 54C547
    • Kicfer. D . A . & Enns. T. 1976: A steady state model of light. temperature. and carbon limited growth of phytoplankton. Pp. 31%336 in Canale, R . P. (cd.): M o d e l i q of Biochemical Prticesses i n Aquaric Sysfems. Ann Arhor Science. Ann Arbor. Michigan.
    • Kicfer. D. A . & Mitchell. B. G . 1983: A simplc, steady state description of phytoplankton growth based on absorption cross scction and quantum cfficiency. Linrtiol. Oceanogr. 28. l l ( k 7 7 6 .
    • Laws. E . A . B Bannister. T. T. 1980:Nutrient- and light-limited growth of Tho/assiosira fluoiufilis in continuous culture with implications for phytoplankton growth in thc occan. Limnol. Oceanojir. LS. 457173
    • Lc). A . C. 8: Mauzerall. D C. 1982: Absolute absorption cross-section for photosystcm I1 and the minimum quantum requirement for photosynthesis in Chlorellu uulguris. Biorhim Biophys. Arru 680.95-106.
    • M y e n . J . & Graham. J. 1971: T h e photosynthetic unit in Chlordla measurcd by repctitivc short Rashcs. PIanr Physrol. 48. 2x2.
    • Oshornc. B. A . & Gcidcr. R . J 1986: Effcct of nitrate-nitrogen limitation of photosynthesis of thc diatom Phueodacfylum rrrcornurum Bohlin (Bacillariophyceae). Plunr Cell Enuiron. Y. 617-625.
    • Petcrson. D . H.. Pcrry. M. J.. Bencdla. K. E . & Talbot. M. C. IYX7. Phytoplankton productivity in relation to light intcnsity: a simple equation. Esruar. Cousr. ShelfSci. 24.813-832.
    • Rythcr. J . H . 8. Ycntsch. C. S . lY57: T h e estimation of phytoplankton production in thc ocean from chlorophyll and light data Litntiol Oceanogr. 2 . 281-286.
    • Sahshaug. E . . Kiefer. D A . & Andrcscn. K . IYRY: A steady state description of growth and light ahsorption in the marine planktonic diatom Skeleronema cosrurum. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34. lYb205.
    • Shuter. B lY7Y- A model of physiological adaptation in unicellular algac. 1. Theor. Biol. 78. 51F552.
    • Smith. R. A . 1980: T h e thcorctical basis for estimating phytoplankton production and specific growth rate from chloroph!II. light. and temperature data. Ecul. Modelling 10. 243- 26..
    • Sukenik. A , . Bennett. J. & Falkowski. P . G . lY87. Lightsdturatcd photosynthesis Q limited by clcctron transport or carhon fixation'? Biochim. Biophvs. Acra 8Yl. 205-215.
    • Wchh. W L . Newton. M . & Starr. D . 1074: Carbon dioxidc exchange of Alnrrs rubra. A mathcmatical model. Oecologiu (BerlrnJ 17. 2X1-2YI
    • Yoder. J . A . 1Y7Y: Effect of tempcrature on light-limited growth and chemical composition of Skeleronetna cosfarurn (Bacillariophyccae) 1. P/iyco/. I S . 362-370.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from