LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Aukes, Leo C.; Geertsma, Jelle; Cohen-Schotanus, Janke; Zwierstra, Rein P.; Slaets, Joris P.J. (2009)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Medical Education Online
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
Objective: This study’s aim was to test the expectation that enhanced experiential learning is an effective educational method that encourages personal reflection in medical students. Methods: Using a pre post-test follow-up design, the level of the personal reflection ability of an exposure group of first-year medical students participating in a new enhanced experiential learning program was compared to that of a control group of second- and third-year medical students participating in a standard problem-based learning program. Personal reflection was assessed using the Groningen Reflection Ability Scale (GRAS). Students’ growth in reflection was analyzed with multilevel analysis. Results: After one year, first-year medical students in the exposure group achieved a level of personal reflection comparable to that reached by students of the control group in their third year. This difference in growth of reflection was statistically significant (p < .001), with a small effect size (effect size = 0.18). The reflection growth curve of the control group declined slightly in the third year as a function of study time. Conclusion: Enhanced experiential learning has a positive effect on the personal reflection ability of undergraduate medical students.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ABIM Foundation. American Board of Internal Medicine; ACP-ASIM Foundation. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine; European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician's charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136:243-6.
    • 2. Frank JR. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework: better physicians, better care. Ottowa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005 [cited 2008 Apr 24]. 40 p. Available from: http://www.webcitation. org/5be55utVL.
    • General Medical Council [Internet]. London: The Council; c2008 [cited 2008 Apr 24]. The Doctor as Teacher. c1999; [about 3 screens]. Available from:http://www.webcitation.org/5bc8IZ4xz.
    • Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287:226- 35.
    • 5. Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP.Challenges for educationalists. BMJ. 2006;333:544-6.
    • 6. Dewey J. How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative pro - cess. Boston: D.C. Heath; 1933.
    • 7. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1984.
    • 8. Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Teaching professionalism: general principles. Med Teach. 2006 May;28(3):205-8.
    • 9. Ertmer PA, Newby TJ. The expert learner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instr Sci. 1996; 24:1-24.
    • 10. Littlewood S, Ypinazar V, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Dornan T. Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: Systematic review. BMJ. 2005;331:387-91.
    • 11. Davis MH, Friedman Ben-David M, Harden RM, Howie P, Ker J, McGhee C, et al. Portfolio assessment in medical students' final examinations. Med Teach. 2001 Jul;23(4):357-366.
    • 12. Snadden D. Portfolios: Attempting to measure the unmeasurable? Med Educ. 1999;33:478-9.
    • 13. Boud D, Walker D. Barriers to reflection on ex - perience. In: Boud D, Cohen R, Walker D, editors. Using experience for learning. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press; 1993. p. 73-86.
    • 14. Aukes LC, Geertsma J, Cohen-Schotanus J, Zwierstra RP, Slaets JP. The development of a scale to measure personal reflection in medical practice and education. Med Teach. 2007;29:177-82.
    • 17. Procee H. Reflection in education: a Kantian epistemology. 2006; Educ Theory. 56: 237−53.
    • 18. Dornan T, Littlewood S, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Ypinazar V. How can experience
    • 20. Maudsley G, Strivens J. Promoting professional knowledge, experiential learning and critical thinking for medical students. Med Educ. 2000; 34:535-44.
    • 21. Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, Vermunt JD, van der Vleuten CP. Use of portfolios in early undergraduate medical training. Med Teach. 2003 Jan;25(1):18-23.
    • 22. Inui TS. A flag in the wind: educating for pro - fessionalism in medicine [Internet]. Washington DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2003. [cited 2008 Apr 24]. Available from: http:// www.webcitation.org/5bcDC5LZu
    • 24. Kember D, Leung DYP, Jones A, Loke AY, McKay J, Sinclair K, Tse H, et al. Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflec - tive thinking. Assess Eval High Educ. 2000; 25: 381−95.
    • 25. Korthagen F. Linking practice and theory: the pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.; 2001.
    • 26. Tigelaar DE, Dolmans DH, de Grave WS, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP. Portfolio as a tool to stimulate teachers' reflections. Med Teach. 2006;28:277-82.
    • 27. Schönrock-Adema J, Heijne-Penninga M, van Duijn MA, Geertsma J, Cohen-Schotanus J.Assessment of professional behavior in undergraduate medical education: Peer assessment enhances performance. Med Educ. 2007;41:836- 42.
    • 28. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage; 1999.
    • 29. Boenink AD, de Jonge P, Smal K, Oderwald A, van Tilburg W. The effects of teaching medical professionalism by means of vignettes: an exploratory study. Med Teach. 2005; 27:429-32.
    • 30. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2003.
    • 31. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull., 1992; 112:155−9.
    • 32. Kruger J, Dunning D.Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own in - competence lead to inflated self-assessments . J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77:1121-34.
    • 33. Hofstee WKB, Kiers HA, Hendriks AAJ. Who is more accurate: self or others? Paper presented at the 9th European Conference on Personality; 1998 July 7-11; Guildford, United Kingdom: European Association of Personality Pschology.
    • 34. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from