Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Berggren, Roy (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
The result of an analysis experiment is discussed. From 29 different analyses of one and the same 500 mb chart certain parameters were calculated. The standard deviation of the height of the 500 mb surface had an average value of 15 gdm, determined over an area of 4,200 times 8,100 km. The correlation coefficient between the observed changes and the changes forecast with a numerical barotropic forecast varied between 0.53 and 0.77 (24h.), 0.77 and 0.84 (48h), respectively. Some other verification parameters are given. Calculations of the geostrophic wind are carried through for all analyses, both at points, over areas and along certain tracks. The deviations due to the differences in analysis are sometimes considerable.DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01889.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • BERGTHORSOPN.,, and Doos, B., 1955: Numerical weather map analysis. Tellus, 7 No. 3, pp. 329-340.
    • BEST,W. H., 1956: Differences in numerical prognoses resulting from differences in analyses. Tellus, 8, No. 3, pp. 351-356.
    • BOLIN, B., 1955: Numerical forecasting with the barotropic model. Tellus, 7, No. I , pp. 27-49.
    • CHARNEYJ.,, 1949: O n the physical basis for numerical prediction of large-scale motions in the atmosphere. J. of Met., 6, pp. 371-38s.
    • CHARNEJY.,,and PHILLIPSN,., 1953: Numerical integration of the quasi-geostrophic equations of motion for barotropic and simple baroclinic flows. /. of Met., 10, pp. 71-99.
    • Doos, B. R., 1956: Automation of 500 mb forecast through successive numerical map analyses. Tellus, 8, N o I, pp. 76-81.
    • Daos, B. R., and EATONM,c., 1957: Upper-air analysis over ocean areas. Tellus, 9, No. 2, pp. 184-194.
    • GATESW,. L., POCINSKIL,. S., and JENKINSC, . F., 1956: Results of numerical forecasting with the barotropic and thermotropic atmospheric models. Geophys. Res. Pap. No. 46.
    • HOVM~LLE.R,,1952: A comparison between observed and computed winds with respect to their applicability for vorticity computations. Tellus, 4. No. 2, pp. 126-134.
    • NEWTONC,. W., 1954: Analysis and data problems in relation to numerical prediction. Bull. Am. Met. SOC.,35, NO. 7. pp. 287-294.
    • NYBERGA,., 1952: On the comparison of radiosonde data in Payerne, May 1950. Sveriges meteorologiska och hydrologiska institut, Medd. serie B, N r 9, 22 pp.
    • SAWYE RJ., S., 1950: Equivalent headwinds, application of upper-wind statistics to air-route planning. Met. Reporfs, No. 6, Met. Office, London.
    • SAWYERJ,. S., and BUSHBYF,. H., 1953: A baroclinic model atmosphere suitable for numerical integration. Journ. of Met., 10,No. I, p p 54-59.
    • Staff Members, Inst. of Met., Umv. of Stockholm, 1954: Results of forecasting with the barotropic model on an electronic computer (BESK). Tellus, 6, No. 2, PP. 139-149.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from