LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Williams, David A.; Kogan, Jennifer R.; Hauer, Karen E.; Yamashita, Traci; Aagaard, Eva M. (2015)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Medical Education Online
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: internal medicine clerkship, Special aspects of education, Research Article, medical students, R5-920, team fragmentation, Medicine (General), duty-hour reform, shift-based schedules, LC8-6691, duty hour reform; shift-based schedules; medical students; internal medicine clerkship; team fragmentation

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
Background: With new resident duty-hour regulations, resident work schedules have progressively transitioned towards shift-based systems, sometimes resulting in increased team fragmentation. We hypothesized that exposure to shift-based schedules and subsequent team fragmentation would negatively affect medical student experiences during their third-year internal medicine clerkship.Design: As part of a larger national study on duty-hour reform, 67 of 150 eligible third-year medical students completed surveys about career choice, teaching and supervision, assessment, patient care, well-being, and attractiveness of a career in internal medicine after completing their internal medicine clerkship. Students who rotated to hospitals with shift-based systems were compared to those who did not. Non-demographic variables used a five-point Likert scale. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess the relationships between exposure to shift-based schedules and student responses. Questions with univariate p≤0.1 were included in multivariable logistic regression models.Results: Thirty-six students (54%) were exposed to shift-based schedules. Students exposed to shift-based schedules were less likely to perceive that their attendings were committed to teaching (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.90, p=0.01) or perceive that residents had sufficient exposure to assess their performance (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09–0.91, p=0.03). However, those students were more likely to feel their interns were able to observe them at the bedside (OR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.08–3.13, p=0.02) and had sufficient exposure to assess their performance (OR 3.00, 95% CI: 1.01–8.86, p=0.05).Conclusions: These findings suggest that shift-based schedules designed in response to duty-hour reform may have important broader implications for the teaching environment.Keywords: duty-hour reform; shift-based schedules; medical students; internal medicine clerkship; team fragmentation(Published: 22 June 2015)Citation: Med Educ Online 2015, 20: 27434 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.27434
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Haidet P, Stein HF. The role of the student teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. The hidden curriculum as process. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: S16 20.
    • 2. Hirsh DA, Ogur B, Thibault GE, Cox M. ''Continuity'' as an organizing principle for clinical education reform. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 858 66.
    • 3. Irby DM. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995; 70: 898 931.
    • 4. Paukert JL, Richards BF. How medical students and residents describe the roles and characteristics of their influential clinical teachers. Acad Med 2000; 75: 843 5.
    • 5. Hauer KE, O'Brien BC, Hansen LA, Hirsh D, Ma IH, Ogur B, et al. More is better: students describe successful and unsuccessful experiences with teachers differently in brief and longitudinal relationships. Acad Med 2012; 87: 1389 96.
    • 6. Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA. The impact of resident duty hour reform in a medicine core clerkship. Acad Med 2004; 79: S58 61.
    • 7. Weinstein DF. Duty hours for resident physicians tough choices for teaching hospitals. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1275 8.
    • 8. Steinbrook R. The debate over residents' work hours. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1296 302.
    • 9. ACGME Common Program Requirements (2010). Available from: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/GraduateMedical Education/DutyHours.aspx [cited 28 September 2012].
    • 10. Irby DM. Educational continuity in clinical clerkships. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 856 7.
    • 11. Bernabeo EC, Holtman MC, Ginsburg S, Rosenbaum JR, Holmboe ES. Lost in transition: the experience and impact of frequent changes in the inpatient learning environment. Acad Med 2011; 86: 591 8.
    • 12. Lachin JM. Biostatistical methods: the assessment of relative risks. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: Wiley; 2000, xvii, 529 p.
    • 13. Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research. Biostatistics Series. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003, ix, 358 p.
    • 14. Fleiss JL, Levin BA, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2003, xxvii, 760 p.
    • 15. Machin D. Sample size tables for clinical studies. 2nd ed. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell Science; 1997, x, 315 p.
    • 16. Fishbein RH. Professionalism and 'the master clinician' an early learning experience. J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 6: 241 3.
    • 17. Beckman TJ. Lessons learned from a peer review of bedside teaching. Acad Med 2004; 79: 343 6.
    • 18. Sternszus R, Cruess S, Cruess R, Young M, Steinert Y. Residents as role models: impact on undergraduate trainees. Acad Med 2012; 87: 1282 7.
    • 19. Wright S, Wong A, Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 53 6.
    • 20. Hill AG, Yu TC, Barrow M, Hattie J. A systematic review of resident-as-teacher programmes. Med Educ 2009; 43: 1129 40.
    • 21. Musunuru S, Lewis B, Rikkers LF, Chen H. Effective surgical residents strongly influence medical students to pursue surgical careers. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 164 7.
    • 22. Nguyen SQ, Divino CM. Surgical residents as medical student mentors. Am J Surg 2007; 193: 90 3.
    • 23. Horwitz LI, Krumholz HM, Green ML, Huot SJ. Transfers of patient care between house staff on internal medicine wards: a national survey. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1173 7.
    • 24. Lang VJ, Mooney CJ, O'Connor AB, Bordley DR, Lurie SJ. Association between hand-off patients and subject exam performance in medicine clerkship students. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 1018 22.
    • 25. Dozois EJ, Holubar SD, Tsikitis VL, Malireddy K, Cima RR, Farley DR, et al. Perceived impact of the 80-hour workweek: five years later. J Surg Res 2009; 156: 3 15.
    • 26. Reed DA, Levine RB, Miller RG, Ashar BH, Bass EB, Rice TN, et al. Effect of residency duty-hour limits: views of key clinical faculty. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1487 92.
    • 27. Arora V, Meltzer D. Effect of ACGME duty hours on attending physician teaching and satisfaction. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 1226 8.
    • 28. Shanafelt TD, Bonne S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 1 9.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article