LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bengtsson, Lennart (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
At the end of the 20th century, we can look back on a spectacular development of numerical weather prediction, which has, practically uninterrupted, been going on since the middle of the century. High-resolution predictions for more than a week ahead for any part of the globe are now routinely produced and anyone with an Internet connection can access many of these forecasts for anywhere in the world. Extended predictions for several seasons ahead are also being done — the latest El Niño event in 1997/1998 is an example of such a successful prediction. The great achievement is due to a number of factors including the progress in computational technology and the establishment of global observing systems, combined with a systematic research program with an overall strategy towards building comprehensive prediction systems for climate and weather. In this article, I will discuss the different evolutionary steps in this development and the way new scientific ideas have contributed to efficiently explore the computing power and in using observations from new types of observing systems. Weather prediction is not an exact science due to unavoidable errors in initial data and in the models. To quantify the reliability of a forecast is therefore essential and probably more so the longer the forecasts are. Ensemble prediction is thus a new and important concept in weather and climate prediction, which I believe will become a routine aspect of weather prediction in the future. The limit between weather and climate prediction is becoming more and more diffuse and in the final part of this article I will outline the way I think development may proceed in the future.DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.00003.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bengtsson, L. 1973. A three-parameter model for limited area forecasting. Environmental Research Facility, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California. Technical Paper No. 73, 88 p.
    • Bengtsson, L. 1981. Numerical prediction of atmospheric blocking. A case study. T ellus 33, 19-42.
    • Bengtsson, L. and J. Shukla, 1988. Integration of space and in situ observations to study global climate change. Bul. Amer. Met. Soc. 69, 1130-1143.
    • Bengtsson, L. 1989. On the growth of errors in data assimilation systems. In: Data assimilation and the use of satellite data. European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Seminar, Reading, 5-9 September 1988, vol. 1, pp. 3-16.
    • Bengtsson, L. 1990. Advances in the numerical prediction of the atmospheric circulation in the extra-tropics. Extratropical Cyclones. The Erik Palme´n Memorial Volume, ed. C. Newton and E. Holopainen. Am. Met. Soc. 107-127, 194-217.
    • Berghtorsson, P., B. R. D o¨ o¨s, S. Fryklund, O. Haug and R. Lindquist, 1955. Routine forecasting with the barotropic mode. T ellus 7, 272-274.
    • Berghtorsson, P. and B. R. D o¨ o¨s, 1955. Numerical weather map analysis. T ellus 7, 329-340.
    • Bolin, B. 1999. Carl-Gustaf Rossby. The Stockholm period 1947-1957. T ellus 51A/B, this issue.
    • Buizza, R. and T. N. Palmer, 1995. The singular vector structure of the atmospheric general circulation. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 1434-1456.
    • Courtier, P., E. Anderson, W. Heckley, G. Kelly, J. Pailleux, F. Rabier, J.-N. The´paut, P. Unde´n, D. Vasiljevic, C. Cardinali, J. Eyre, M. Hamrud, J. Haseler, A. Hollingsworth, A. McNally and A. StoVelen, 1993. Variational assimilation at ECMW F. ECMWF Research Department Technical Memorandum 194.
    • Dalcher, A. and E. Kalnay, 1987. Error growth and predictability in operational ECMWF forecasts. T ellus 39A, 474-491.
    • Do¨ o¨ s, B. R. 1956. Automation of 500 mb forecasts through successive numerical map analyses. T ellus 8, 76-81.
    • Gibson, J. K., P. Ka˚llberg, S. Uppala, A. Hernandez, A. Nomura and E. Serrano, 1997. ECMW F reanalysis project report series (1). ERA description. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading/UK, 72 pp.
    • Jarraud, M. and C. Girard, 1984. Extensive quasi-operational comparison between a spectral and a grid-point model. In: Numerical methods for weather prediction. European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Seminar, Reading, 5-9 September 1983, vol. 2, pp. 61-111.
    • Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, W. Collins, D. Deaven, L. Gandin, M. Iredell, S. Saha, G. White, J. Woollen, Y. Zhu, A. Leetmaa and R. Reynolds, 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bul. Amer. Met. Soc. 77, 437-471.
    • Laursen, L. and E. Eliasen, 1989. EVects of the damping mechanism in an atmospheric general circulation model. T ellus 41A, 385-400.
    • Leith, C. E. 1983. Predictability in theory and practice. In: L arge-scale dynamical processes in the atmosphere, B. J. Hoskins and R. P. Pearce (eds.). Academic Press, 365-383.
    • Machenhauer, B. 1977. On the dynamics of gravity oscillations in a shallow water model, with applications to normal mode initialization. Contributions to Atmospheric Physics 50, 253-271.
    • Marchuk, G. I. 1974. Numerical methods in weather prediction. N.Y., Academic Press, 277 pp.
    • Molteni, F., R. Buizza, A. Lanzinger and T. N. Palmer, 1996. Potential use of the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: methodology and validation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122, 73-119.
    • Palmer, T. N., R. Buizza and F. Lalaurette, 1998. Performance of the ECMW F ensemble prediction system. ECMWF Workshop on Predictability, 1998. In press. Available from ECMWF.
    • Robert, A. J. 1982. A semi-Lagrangian and semi-implicit numerical integration scheme for the primitive meteorological equations. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan 60, 319-324.
    • Robert, A. J., Yee, T.-L. and H. Ritchie, 1985. A semiLagrangian and semi-implicit numerical integration scheme for multi-level atmospheric models. Mon. Wea. Rev. 113, 388-394.
    • Rossby, C. G. 1957. Aktuella meteorologiska problem. Svensk Naturvetenskap 1956. Swedish Natural Science Research Council. Translated into English: Current problems in meteorology. The Rossby Memorial Volume. Rockefeller Institute Press in association with Oxford University Press, New York 1959.
    • StaV Members, Inst. of Meteorology, Univ. of Stockholm, 1954: Results of forecasting with the barotropic model on an electronic computer (BESK). T ellus 6, 139-149.
    • Tibaldi, S., A. Buzzi and A. Speranza, 1990. Orographic cyclogenesis. Extratropical cyclones. The Erik Palme´n Memorial Volume, eds. C. Newton and E. Holopainen. Am. Met. Soc. 107-127.
    • Wiin-Nielsen, A. 1985. T he scientific problem of mediumrange weather prediction. Medium range weather forecasts - the first 10 years. Proceedings of a Seminar to commemorate the 10th anniversary of ECMWF. 22 November 1985, 31-53.
    • Wiin-Nielsen, A. 1991. The birth of numerical weather prediction. T ellus 43, AB, 36-52.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from