Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Streyffeler, Lisa; Altmaier, Elizabeth M.; Kuperman, Samuel; Patrick, Luke E. (2009)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Medical Education Online
Languages: English
Types: Article
Background: Interest in improving medical school admissions processes led to the development of a structured admissions interview to eliminate potential bias and provide valid information for selection. This article reports on the degree to which this interview, along with other admissions variables, predicted later student performance during medical school. Methods: All applicants considered for admission participated in the new interview. Interview scores and regular admissions data were compiled. Measures of performance in cognitive (e.g., written test scores) and non-cognitive (e.g., ratings of listening skills) domains were gathered during participants’ enrollment in medical school and correlated with measures gathered during the admissions process. Results: Cognitive predictors predicted later performance in cognitive domains but did not predict non-cognitive performance. Both written and interview-based measures of non-cognitive abilities predicted performance in non-cognitive domains. Both cognitive and non-cognitive predictors predicted grades in clinical rotations, which presumably reflect a mixture of cognitive and non-cognitive abilities. Conclusions: Our results do not support the predictive validity of our interview-based measure above other cognitive and non-cognitive admissions variables more easily gathered. However, in some domains, interview-based variables did incrementally predict medical school performance.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Walton H. Admissions procedures to medical schools. Med Educ. 1994;28:263-4.
    • 3. Spooner CE, Jr. Help for the gatekeepers: comment and summation on the admission process [comment]. Acad Med. 1990;65:183- 7.
    • Time for a review of admission to medical school? Lancet. 1995;346:1329-33.
    • 15. Patrick LE, Altmaier EM, Kuperman S, Ugolini K. Development of a medical school admissions interview: phase 1. Initial procedures and results. Acad Med. 2001:76:66-71.
    • 16. Powis DA, Neame RL, Bristow T, Murphy LB. The objective structured interview for medical school selection. Br Med J. 1988;296:765-8.
    • Moruzi-Kulatunga C, Norman GR. Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: The contribution of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions. Teach Lrn Med 2002: 14:34-42.
    • Basco WT, Gilbert GE, Chessman AW, Blue AV. The ability of a medical school admission process to predict clinical performance and patients' satisfaction. Acad Med 2000:75:743- 747.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from