Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lewis, John M.; Derber, John C. (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
A methodology is developed to guarantee time continuity in a sequence of analyses. Coupling is accomplished by requiring the least squares minimization of adjustment to the analyses subject to dynamic constraints. In this paper, the analyses are assumed to be governed by advective constraints such as those used in vorticity conservation models; however, the method can easily be applied to other constraints. The results correspond to the application of a strong constraint as introduced by Sasaki, but the procedure used to accomplish the minimization is an alternative to the traditional methods for solution of the Euler-Lagrange equation. The method allows easier inclusion of more time levels in the analysis sequence as well as accommodation of more complicated constraints. The method is tested using both simulated and real data. The simulated data studies use a one-dimensional advection equation with progressively more complicated dynamics: constant advection velocity, spatially varying advection velocity, and nonlinear advection. The real data case study uses an advection of quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity constraint to examine the height adjustment process for three time periods on 6 March 1982. Separate studies are made for analyses derived from VAS and RAOB data. The results of this study indicate the method has excellent potential to reduce the random component of the analysis errors.DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.1985.tb00430.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Avriel, M. 1976. Nonlinear programming: analvsis and merhods. Prentice-Hall. Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 5 I 2 pp.
    • Barnes. S . L. 1973. Mesoscale objective analysis using weighted time-series observations. NOAA Technical Memorandum E R L NSSL-62. National Severe Storms Laboratory, 13 13 Halley Circle, Norman Oklahoma, 73069,60 pp., INTIS COM-73-107811.
    • Bengtsson, L. 1975. Four-dimensional assimilation of meteorological observations. Geneva, World Meteorological Organization, International Council of Scientific Unions. Joint Organizing Committee. 75 pp ( C A R P Publications Series no. 15).
    • Bengtsson, L.. Ghil, M. and Kallen, E. (eds.) 1981. Dynamic meteorology: data assimilation methods. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 3 3 0 pp.
    • Bloom, S. C. 1983. The use of dynamical constraints in the analysis of mesoscale rawinsonde data. Tellus 35A, 363-378.
    • Burgers, J. M. 1939. Mathematical examples illustrating relations occurring in the theory of turbulent fluid motion. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen (Erste Sectie), 17, 53 pp.
    • Courant, R. and Hilbert, D. 1962. Methods of mathematicalphysics, vol. 11. Interscience Pub]., 830 pp.
    • Hovermale, J. 1983. Summary of a workshop on atmospheric profiling. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. SOC.64, 1062- 1066.
    • Kreyszig, E. 1978. Introductoryfunctional analysis with applications. John Wiley and Sons, 688 pp (see pages 195-206).
    • LeDimet, F. X. 1982. A general formalism of variational analysis. CIMMS report 22, Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, 8 15 Jenkins Street, Norman, O K , 73019,34 pp.
    • Lewis, J. M. 1982. Adaptation of P. D. Thompson's scheme to the constraint of potential vorticity conservation. Mon. Wea.Rev. 110, 1618-1634.
    • Lewis, J. M. and Panetta, L. 1983. The extension of P. D. Thompson's scheme to multiple time levels. J . Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 22, 1649-1653.
    • Lions, J. L. 1971. Optimal control of systems governed by partial digerential equations. Translated by S . K. Mitter. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
    • Miyakoda, K. and Talagrand, 0. 1971. The assimilation of past data in dynamical analysis. I. Tellus 23, 310-317.
    • Platzman, G. W. 1964. An exact integral of complete spectral equations for unsteady one-dimensional flow. Tellus 1 6 , 4 2 2 4 3 1.
    • Polak, E. 197 I . Computational methods in optimization. a unified approach. Academic Press, New York, 329 PP.
    • Sasaki, Y. 1958. An objective analysis based on the variational method. J . Meteorol. SOC.Japan I I , 36, 77-88.
    • Sasaki, Y. 1970. Some basic formalisms in numerical variational analysis. Mon. Wea.Rev. 98, 875-883.
    • Smith, W. L. 1983. The retrieval of atmospheric profiles from VAS geostationary radiance observations. J . Atmos. Sci. 40,2025-2035.
    • Thompson, P. D. 1969. Reduction of analysis error through constraints of dynamical consistency. J. Appl. Meteorol. 8 , 738-742
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from