LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
HUMMEL, JOHN R. (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
A comparison is made of the surface temperature sensitivities in the Hummel–Kuhn radiative–convective model with fixed clouds, but without water vapor transport, using first the constant critical lapse rate of 6.5 K/km and then with pressure-dependent moist adiabatic critical lapse rates. The moist adiabatic critical lapse rate formulation is shown to yield consistently smaller surface temperature sensitivities to parameter variations than those yielded from using the traditional 6.5 K/km. For a doubling of carbon dioxide (300 p.p.m.v. to 600 p.p.m.v.). the surface temperature increase is 1.29 K with moist adiabatic lapse rates compared with 1.83 K for the 6.5 K/km formulation. In addition, the surface temperature sensitivities to changes in surface relative humidity, surface albedo, and cloud amounts are shown to be nonlinear with pressure-dependent critical lapse rates rather than linear as with the constant 6.5 K/km.DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1982.tb01809.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bignell, W. J. 1970. The water-vapour infrared continuum. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. SOC.96, 390-403.
    • Hummel, J. R. and Kuhn, W. R. 1981. Comparison of radiative-convective models with constant and pressure-dependent lapse rates. Tellus 33, 254-26 1.
    • Hunt, B. G. and Wells, N. C. 1979. An assessment of possible future climatic impact of carbon dioxide increases based on a coupled one-dimensional atmospheric oceanic model. J. Geophys. Res. 8 4 , 787-791.
    • Manabe, S . and Strickler, R. F. 1964. Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a convective adjustment. J.Atmos. Sci. 21,361-385.
    • Manabe, S . and Wetherald, R. T. 1967. Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J. Atmos. Sci. 24, 24 1-259.
    • Ramanathan, V. 1976. Radiative transfer within the earth's troposphere and stratosphere: A simplified radiative-convective model. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1330- 1346.
    • Reck, R. A. 1978. Global temperature changes: Relative importance of different parameters as calculated with a radiative+onvective model. In Carbon Dioxide Climate and Society (ed. Jill Williams). New York: Pergamon Press, 193-200.
    • Rennick, M. A. 1977. The parameterization of tropospheric lapse rates in terms of surface temperature. J . Atmos. Sci.34,854-862.
    • Schneider, S. H. 1972. Cloudiness as a global climatic feedback mechanism: The effects on the radiation balance and surface temperature of variations in cloudiness. J. Atmos. Sci.29, 1413-1422.
    • Stone, P. and Carlson, J. 1979. Atmospheric lapse rate regimes and their parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci. 36, 4 1 5 4 2 3 .
    • Weare, B. C. and Snell, F. M. 1974. A diffuse thin cloud structure as a feedback mechanism in global climatic modeling.J.Atmos. Sci. 31, 1725-1734.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from