LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mauritsen, Thorsten; Källén, Erland (2004)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Physics::Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
The predictability of the atmospheric blocking phenomenon is investigated using the output of the high-resolution ensemble prediction system of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. The output from the model is analysed using an objective blocking index. This is compared with the theory of Charney and DeVore that blocking is a large-scale non-linear phenomenon. A consequence of the non-linearity is that in some cases multiple quasi-stationary atmospheric states can exist for the same set of boundary conditions. It is found that the model in general produces too few blocks. Good agreement is found between the models lacking ability to predict blocking frequency and the systematic errors of 500-hPa geopotential height. It is found that there exists a limit, in the middle of the medium range, beyond which forecasts of blocking onset should be considered as probabilistic rather than dynamical. Inspection of individual blocking events adds new support to the idea that atmospheric blocking can be explained using the Charney–DeVore model.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Berggren, R., Bolin, B. and Rossby, C.-G. 1949. An aerological study of zonal motion, its perturbations and break-down. Tellus 1, 14-37.
    • Buizza, R. and Palmer, T. N. 1995. The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 1434-1456.
    • Charney, J. G. and DeVore, J. G. 1979. Multiple flow equilibria in the atmosphere and blocking. J. Atmos. Sci. 36, 1205-1216.
    • Chen, W. Y. and Juang, H.-M. H. 1992. Effects of transient eddies on blocking flows: general circulation model experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev. 120, 787-801.
    • D'Andrea, F., Tibaldi, S., Blackburn, M., Boer, G., De´que´, M., Dix, M. R., Dugas, B., Ferranti, L., Iwasaki, T., Kitoh, A., Pope, V., Randall, D., Roeckner, E., Strauss, D., Stern, W., Van den Dool, H. and Williamson, D. 1998. Northern Hemsiphere atmospheric blocking as simulated by 15 atmospheric general circulation models in the period 1979-1988. Climate Dyn. 14, 385-407.
    • Ditlevsen, P. D. 1999. Anomalous jumping in a double-well potential. Phys. Rev. E 60, 172-179.
    • Dole, R. M. and Gordon, N. D. 1983. Persistent anomalies of the extratropical Northern Hemisphere wintertime circulation: geographical distribution and regional persistence characteristics. Mon. Wea. Rev. 111, 1567-1586.
    • Ferranti, L., Klinker, E., Hollingsworth, A. and Hoskins, B. J. 2002. Diagnosis of systematic forecast errors dependent on flow pattern. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 128, 1623-1640.
    • Held, I. M. 1983. Stationary and quasi-stationary eddies in the extratropical troposphere: theory. In Large-Scale Dynamical Processes in the Atmosphere, Academic Press, New York, 127-168.
    • Holton, J. R. 1992. An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology, 3rd edition. Academic Press, Seattle, WA, 510 pp.
    • Hoskins, B. J. and Karoly, D. J. 1981. The steady linear response of a spherical atmosphere to thermal and orographic forcing. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 1179-1196.
    • Hoskins, B. J., Buizza, R. and Badger, J. 2000. The nature of singular vector growth and structure. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 126, 1565-1580.
    • Itoh, H. and Kimoto, M. 1996. Multiple attractors and chaotic itinerancy in a quasi-geostrophic model with realistic topography: implications for weather regimes and low-frequency variability. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 2217-2231.
    • Ka¨lle´n, E. 1981. Nonlinear effects of orographic and momentum forcing in a low-order, barotropic model. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2150-2163.
    • Ka¨lle´n, E. 1985. On hysteresislike effects in orographically forced models. Tellus 37A, 249-257.
    • Legras, B. and Ghil, M. 1985. Persistent anomalies, blocking and variations in atmospheric predictability. J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 433-471.
    • Lejena¨s, H. and Økland, H. 1983. Characteristics of Northern Hemispheric blocking as determined from a long time series of observational data. Tellus 35A, 350-362.
    • Michelangeli, P.-A. and Vautard, R. 1998. The dynamics of Euro-Atlantic blocking onsets. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 124, 1045-1070.
    • Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N. and Petroliagis, T. 1996. The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: methodology and validation. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 122, 73-120.
    • Palmer, T. N., Brankovic, C., Molteni, F. and Tibaldi, S. 1990. Extendedrange predictions with ECMWF models: Interannual variability in operational model integrations. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 116, 799-834.
    • Pavan, V., Tibaldi, S. and Brankovich, C. 2000. Seasonal prediction of blocking frequency: results from winter ensemble experiments. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 126, 2125-2142.
    • Reinhold, B. and Pierrehumbert, R. 1982. Dynamics of weather regimes: quasi-stationary waves and blocking. Mon. Wea. Rev. 110, 1105-1145.
    • Rex, D. F. 1950a. Blocking action in the Middle Troposphere and its effect upon regional climate (I). An aerological study of blocking. Tellus 2, 196-211.
    • Rex, D. F. 1950b. Blocking action in the Middle Troposphere and its effect upon regional climate (II). The climatology of atmospheric blocking. Tellus 2, 275-301.
    • Rex, D. F. 1951. The effect of Atlantic blocking action upon European climate. Tellus 3, 100-112.
    • Simmons, A. J., Mureau, R. and Petroliagis, T. 1995. Error growth and estimates of predictability from the ECMWF forecasting system. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 121, 1739-1771.
    • Tibaldi, S. and Molteni, F. 1990. On the operational predictability of blocking. Tellus 42A, 343-365.
    • Tibaldi, S., Tosi, E., Navarra, A. and Pedulli, L. 1994. Northern and Southern hemisphere seasonal variability of blocking frequency and predictability. Mon. Wea. Rev. 122, 1971-2003.
    • Tibaldi, S., Ruti, P., Tosi, E. and Maruca, M. 1995. Operational predictability of winter blocking at ECMWF: an update. Ann. Geophys. 13, 305-317.
    • Trevisan, A., Pancotti, F. and Molteni, F. 2001. Ensemble prediction in a model with flow regimes. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 127, 343-358.
    • Wallace, J. M. and Gutzler, D. S. 1981. Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere winter. Mon. Wea. Rev. 109, 784-812.
    • Yang, S., Reinhold, B. and Ka¨lle´n, E. 1997. Multiple weather regimes and baroclinically forced spherical resonance. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 1397- 1409.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from