LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Niva, Mari (2008)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Food & Nutrition Research
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: digestive, oral, and skin physiology
Background: Healthy eating has a social pattern, with women and those in high socioeconomic positions most likely to follow dietary guidelines. However, little is known about the association of sociodemographic and health factors with the use of health-promoting functional foods. Objective: The study examined the use of functional foods in Finland. Four widely used product types were examined in detail with respect to sociodemographic factors and personal efforts to promote health. Design: Data were obtained by computer-assisted telephone interviews of 1210 respondents representing the Finnish population above 15 years of age. Logistic regression analysis was applied to analyse the predictors of use of functional foods. Results: Sociodemographic variables were associated with the use of functional foods. The role of gender and age varied. In most cases, high education or high occupational position predicted use. Use was also associated with viewing healthy eating as important and consuming other functional foods. Efforts to lower cholesterol levels predicted the use of cholesterol-lowering spreads. Conclusions: Both sociodemographic factors and personal health efforts play a role in the adoption of functional foods. High socioeconomic position predicts use, whereas age and gender remain product specific. An important aspect is the connection of functional foods with efforts to lead a healthy life. For healthorientated consumers, functional foods may represent a complementary health practice. Keywords: consumers; eating; functional foods; health; sociodemographics
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Diplock AT, Agget PJ, Ashwell M, Bornet F, Fern EB, Roberfroid MB. Scientific concepts of functional foods in Europe: consensus document. Br J Nutr 1999; 81(Suppl 1): S1 /27.
    • 2. Consumer Agency. Terveysvaikutteisina markkinoidut elintarvikkeet. Kuluttajaviraston hintavertailuja [Foods marketed as functional foods. Consumer Agency's price comparisons 1/2004]. pdf, June 2004: http://www.kuluttajavirasto.fi/user/loadFile.asp?id /5509. Consumer Agency; 2004. (In Finnish.)
    • 3. Poulsen JB. Danish consumers' attitudes towards functional foods. Working Paper 62. Aarhus: MAPP / Centre for Market Surveillance, Research and Strategy for the Food Sector; 1999.
    • 4. van Kleef E, van Trijp HCM, Luning P, Jongen WMF. Consumer-oriented functional food development: how well do functional disciplines reflect the ''voice of the consumer''? Trends in Food Science and Technology 2002; 13: 93 /101.
    • 5. Bech-Larsen T, Grunert KG. The perceived healthiness of functional foods. A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers' perception of functional foods. Appetite 2003; 40: 9 /14.
    • 6. Urala N, La¨hteenma¨ki L. Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods. Food Quality and Preference 2004; 15: 793 /803.
    • 7. Verbeke W. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Quality and Preference 2005; 16: 45 /57.
    • 8. Niva M, Jauho M. Ruoan ja la¨ a¨kkeen va¨limaastossa. Funktionaalisia elintarvikkeita koskevat ka¨sitykset ja julkinen keskustelu [In between foods and drugs / views and public debate on functional foods]. Publications 2. Helsinki: National Consumer Research Centre; 1999. (In Finnish.)
    • 9. Jonas MS, Beckmann SC. Functional foods: consumer perceptions in Denmark and England. Working Paper 55. Aarhus: MAPP / Centre for Market Surveillance, Research and Strategy for the Food Sector; 1998.
    • 10. Bhaskaran S, Hardley F. Buyer beliefs, attitudes and behaviours: foods with therapeutic claims. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2002; 19: 591 /606.
    • 11. Svederberg E. Consumers' views regarding health claims on two food packages. Pedagogical Reports 21. Lund: Department of Education, Lund University; 2002.
    • 12. Mennell S. All manners of food. Eating and taste in England and France from the Middle Ages to the present. Oxford: Blackwell; 1985.
    • 13. Featherstone M. Consumer culture and postmodernism. London: Sage; 1991.
    • 14. Blaxter M. Health and lifestyles. London: Routledge; 1990.
    • 15. Warde A. Consumption, foods and taste. Culinary antinomies and commodity culture. London: Sage; 1997.
    • 16. Roos E. Gender, socioeconomic status and family status as determinants of food behaviour. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 1519 /29.
    • 17. Kjaernes U, ed. Eating patterns. A day in the lives of Nordic peoples. Lysaker: Statens institutt for forbruksforskning (SIFO); 2001.
    • 18. Roos E. Social patterning of food behaviour among Finnish men and women. Publications A6. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute; 1998.
    • 19. Helakorpi S, Patja K, Pra¨tta¨la¨ R, Uutela A. Suomalaisen aikuisva¨esto¨ n terveyska¨ytta¨ytyminen ja terveys, keva¨t 2005 [Health behaviour and health among the Finnish adult population, spring 2005]. Publications B18. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute; 2005. (In Finnish.)
    • 20. Beardsworth A, Keil T. Sociology on the menu: an invitation to the study of food and society. London: Routledge; 1997.
    • 21. Germov J, Williams L. The hyper-rational social appetite: towards a synthesis of food trends. In: Germov J, Williams L, eds. A sociology of food and nutrition: the social appetite. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 301 /10.
    • 22. Nestle M. Food politics. How the food industry influences nutrition and health. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002.
    • 23. de Jong N, Ocke´ MC, Branderhorst HAC, Friele R. Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of functional food consumers and dietary supplement users. Br J Nutr 2003; 89: 273 /81.
    • 24. Laatikainen T, Tapanainen H, Alfthan G, Salminen I, Sundvall J, Leiviska¨ J, et al. Finrisk. Appendix of tables. Publications B7. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute; 2003. (In Finnish.)
    • 25. Anttolainen M, Luoto R, Uutela A, Boice JD, Blot WJ, McLaughlin J, et al. Characteristics of users and nonusers of plant stanol ester margarine in Finland: an approach to study functional foods. J Am Diet Assoc 2001; 101: 1365 /8.
    • 26. de Jong N, Simojoki M, Laatikainen T, Tapanainen H, Valsta L, Lahti-Koski M, et al. The combined use of cholesterol-lowering drugs and cholesterol-lowering bread spreads: health behavior data from Finland. Prev Med 2004; 39: 849 /55.
    • 27. Statistical Yearbook of Finland 2003. Helsinki: Statistics Finland; 2003.
    • 28. Korhonen H. Functional foods. Funktionaaliset elintarvikkeet. Uuden vuosituhannen terveysruokaa? [Health foods of the new millennium?]. Elintarvike ja Terveys 2001; 15(4): 11 /25. (In Finnish.)
    • 29. Niva M, Ma¨kela¨ J, Piiroinen S. Kotimaisia marjoja ja kasvistanoleja. Terveysvaikutteisten elintarvikkeiden hyva¨ksytta¨vyys Suomessa [Domestic berries and plant stanols. Acceptability of functional foods in Finland]. Publications 9. Helsinki: National Consumer Research Centre; 2003. (In Finnish.)
    • 30. Sharma S. Applied multivariate techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
    • 31. Holm L. Food health policies and ethics: lay perspectives on functional foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2003; 16: 531 /44.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from