Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Junemann, Carolina; Ball, Stephen J. (2013)
Publisher: Education Inquiry
Journal: Education Inquiry
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper addresses some recent changes in the landscape of state education in England. In particular, it focuses on the way in which Academies, state-funded independent schools introduced by New Labour and now being drastically extended and taken further by the Coalition government, are contributing to the ongoing and increasing blurring of the welfare state demarcations between state and market, public and private, government and business; and are pointing up the shift in the role of the state from ‘‘directing bureaucracies’’ to ‘‘managing networks’’ (Smith 1999). Academies have been contracted out to a wide range of sponsors (entrepreneurs, business, charities, faith groups) and removed from local authority control (they are funded directly by central government). They involve a deliberate attempt to promote a new set of values and modes of action in public education, enterprise and competitiveness in particular. The paper will look closely at the case of one multi-academy sponsor, the charity Absolute Return for Kids (ARK), which was founded by a group of hedge fund managers and is rapidly expanding its involvement in state education in England (and in the USA, India and Uganda), taking up positions and roles previously reserved for the state itself and bringing new practices and methods to bear upon education problems.Keywords: education policy, governance of the education system, new philanthropy, academy schools, ARK(Published: 16 September 2013)Citation: Education Inquiry (EDUI) 2013, 4, 22611, http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i3.22611
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bache, Ian. (2003). Governing through Governance: Education Policy Control under New Labour. Political Studies, 51(2), 300 314.
    • Ball, Stephen J. (2008). The Legacy of ERA, Privatization and the Policy Ratchet. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 185 199.
    • Ball, Stephen J. (2012). Global Ed. Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary. London: Routledge.
    • Ball, Stephen J. & Junemann, Carolina (2011). Education Policy and Philanthropy: The Changing Landscape of English Educational Governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(10), 646 661.
    • Ball, Stephen J. and Junemann, Carolina (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: Policy Press.
    • Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003). Interpreting British governance. London: Routledge.
    • Bochel, Hugh, ed. (2011). The Conservative Party and social policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
    • Croft, James (2011). Profit making free schools: Unlocking the potential of England's proprietorial schools sector. Adam Smith Research Trust. http://www.adamsmith.org/sites/ default/files/resources/ASI_School_report_WEB.pdf
    • Handy, Charles (2006). The new philanthropists: The new generosity. London: William Heinemann.
    • HM Government (2010). Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: An Essential Guide. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
    • Howard, Philip N. (2002). Network Ethnography and the Hypermedia Organization: New Media, New Organizations, New Methods. New Media and Society, 4, 550 574.
    • Jessop, Bob (1998). The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure. International Social Science Journal, 155(1), 29 45.
    • Kooiman, Jan, ed. (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.
    • Laird, Andrew and Wilson, Justin (2012). Social enterprise schools: A potential profit-sharing model for the state-funded school system. London: Policy Exchange.
    • MacKenzie, Robert & Martinez Lucio, Miguel (2005). The Realities of Regulatory Change: Beyond the Fetish of Deregulation. Sociology, 39(3), 499 517.
    • Marinetto, Mike (2003). Governing beyond the Centre: A Critique of the Anglo-Governance School. Political Studies, 51(3), 592 608.
    • Newman, Janet (2001). Modernising governance: New Labour, policy and society. London: Sage.
    • Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted (1992). Re-inventing government. Reading: Mass, AddisonWesley.
    • Peterson, John (2003). Policy networks. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
    • Rhodes, Rod A.W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 54, 652 667.
    • Rhodes, Rod A.W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Pierre, Jon, ed. (2000). Debating governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Pierre, Jon and Peters, B. Guy (2000). Governance, politics, and the state. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
    • See, Helena (2012). Profit in Education: Where we are now: An Overview of Policies and Controversies from around the World. National Skills Forum and Associate Parliamentary Skills Group. http://www.policyconnect.org.uk/sites/default/files/Profit%20in%20education% 20-%20final.pdf
    • Shamir, Ronen (2008). The Age of Responsibilitization: On market-embedded Morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1 19.
    • Skelcher, C.K. Mathur, N. and Smith S.N. (2004). Negotiating the institutional void: Discursive alignments, collaborative institutions and democratic governance. INLoGov: University of Birmingham.
    • Smith, Martin J. (1999). The core executive in Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    • Stanfield, James B., ed. (2012). The profit motive in education: Continuing the revolution. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
    • Williams, Paul (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103 124.
    • Wittel, Andreas (2000). Ethnography on the Move: From Field to Net to Internet. Forum: Qualitative Research, 1, Art 21.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from