Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wedlin, Linda (2011)
Publisher: Education Inquiry
Journal: Education Inquiry
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Marketisation, rankings, business schools, competition, governance
Rankings are elements of market governance of higher education and research. Despite the growing importance of these systems in global policy-making, little scholarly attention has been paid to the role rankings play as elements of governance. This paper presents an empirical study of the introduction of international rankings in management education and the responses to these developments among European business schools. The paper analyses how rankings have shaped perceptions of an international market and competition among business schools in this field via two important processes: constructing comparability and thereby consolidating views of the “customer” and the “product” in a perceived global market, and by crafting perceptions and mechanisms for competition among business schools in this field. This suggests that rankings have been important in shaping this field as global and competitive in character, contributing to what is commonly referred to as the increasing “marketisation” of the field.Keywords: Marketisation, rankings, business schools, competition, governance(Published: 1 December 2011)Citation: Education Inquiry Vol. 2, No. 4, December 2011, pp.563–579
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bok, D. (2004) Universities in the Marketplace. The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Business Week, 19 October (1998), special report “The best business schools”, pp. 80-98.
    • Czarniawska, B. and Genell, K. (2002) Gone shopping? Universities on their way to the Market. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18(4): 455-474.
    • Daniel, C. (1998) MBA: The First Century. London: Associated University Press.
    • Djelic, M-L (2006) Marketization: From intellectual agenda to global policy-making. In M-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds.) Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, pp. 53-73. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Djelic, M-L & Sahlin-Andersson, K., (2006) Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Efmd, (2007) efmd Report series, Report 2, The business of branding: Enhancing business school marketing effectiveness through better understanding key audiences. Available at www. efmd.org, 20008-01-22. (http://www.efmd.org/attachments/tmpl_3_art_070926nkfp_att_ 070926xwqk.pdf)
    • Elsbach, K. and Kramer, R. D. (1996) Members' responses to organizational identity threats: encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3): 442-76.
    • Espeland, W., and Stevens, M. (1998) Commensuration as a process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1): 313-43.
    • European Commission, Press Release, IP/08/1942, Ranking Europe's universities.
    • Federkeil, G. (2008) Rankings and quality assurance in higher education. Higher Education in Europe 33(2): 219-231.
    • Financial Times, 25 January (1999) “Rankings can both help and rankle”, FT Survey.
    • Financial Times, 4 June (2001) “Some painful lessons for the e-learning sector”, FT Survey.
    • Frank, D. and Meyer, J. W. (2007) University expansion and the knowledge society. Theory and Society, 36: 287-311.
    • Harvey, L. (2008) Rankings of higher education institutions: A critical review, Quality in Higher Education, 14(3): 187-207.
    • Hazelkorn, E. (2007) The impact of league tables and ranking systems on higher education decision making. Higher Education Management and Policy 19(2): 87-110.
    • Hedmo, T., Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Wedlin, L. (2006) The emergence of a European regulatory field of management education. In M.-L. Djeclic and K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds), Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, pp. 308-328. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hedmo, T. and Wedlin, L. (2008) New modes of governance: The re-regulation of European higher education and research. In Mazza, C., Quattrone, P. and Riccaboni, A. European Universities in Transition: Issues, Models and Cases, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Kehm, B. and Stensaker, B. (eds) (2009) University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
    • King, R. (2009) Governing Universities Globally. Organizations, Regulation and Rankings. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    • Kirp, D. (2003) Shakespeare, Einstein and the Bottom Line. The Marketing of Higher Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Kivinen, O. & Hedman, J. (2008) World-wide university rankings: A Scandinavian approach, Scientometrics, 74(3): 391-408.
    • Kornberger, M. and Carter, C. (2010) Manufacturing competition: How accounting practices shape strategy making in cities. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 23(3): 325-349.
    • Martins, L. (2005) A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organization Science, 16(6): 701-720.
    • Mazza, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K., and Strandgaard Pedersen, J. (2005) European constructions of an American model: Developments of four MBA programs. Management Learning, 36(4): 471-491.
    • Modell, S. (2005) Students as consumers?: An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(4): 537-63.
    • Moon, H. (2002) The Globalization of Professional Management Education 1881-2000: Its Rise, Expansion and Implications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford.
    • Morse, R. (2008) The real and perceived influence of the US News Ranking. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2): 349-356.
    • Neave, G. (1998) The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3): 265- 284.
    • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (eds.) (2009) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sauder, M. (2006) Third parties and status position: How the characteristics of status systems matter. Theory and Society 35(3): 299-321.
    • Sauder, M. (2008) Interlopers and field change: The entry of the us news into the field of legal education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2): 209-234.
    • Selections, (2001) Interview with John Byrne of Business Week. http://www.gmac.com/selections/fall2001/byrne/index.html (accessed 19 November 2010)
    • Shore, C. and Wright, S. (2000) Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (ed.), Audit Cultures. Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, pp 57-89. London: Routledge.
    • Siganos, A. (2008) Rankings, governance, and attractiveness of higher education: The new French context. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2): 311-316.
    • Sowter, B. (2008) The Times higher education supplement and Quacquarelli Symonds world university rankings: New developments in ranking methodology. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2): 345-347.
    • Stensaker, B. & Harvey, L. (2010) Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power, NY, Abingdon UK: Routledge.
    • Times, 16 May (2005) “Branding makes a big difference for schools”.
    • Van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. (2010) Multidimensional ranking: A new transparency tool for higher education and research. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3): 1-26.
    • Wedlin, L. (2006) Ranking Business Schools. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    • Whitley, R. & Gläser, J. (eds.) (2007) The Changing Governance of the Sciences, Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
    • Wright, S. & Ørberg, W. (2008) Autonomy and control: Danish university reform in the context of modern governance. Learning and Teaching: International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences (LATISS) 1(1): 27-57.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from