Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Widmark, Catarina; Lagerlund, Magdalena; Ahlberg, Beth Maina; Tishelman, Carol (2010)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
Languages: English
Types: Article
Most research on cervical cancer screening from the perspective of the involved women tends to focus on issues specifically related to screening participation, knowledge and information needs or experiences. Our previous research in this area indicated a need to investigate women's perspectives on cancer screening within a broader framework. Therefore, in this study, we aim to understand better, how women reason about health, ill health, health maintenance and disease prevention, in relation to cancer prevention and screening. We conducted twelve focus group discussions in Sweden with 49 women between the ages of 21 and 74 years. The findings indicate that women's reasoning about different aspects of "control"* physical, physiological, emotional and social*was central in understanding their view on cancer prevention and screening. The desire for and burden of maintaining control appeared to affect their decisions and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening, with health maintenance described as having a "high price". Whereas some women motivated their screening attendance as a means of maintaining control, others described abstaining from screening which appeared to threaten their sense of control. It was also found that women reason differently about mammography and cervical cancer screening, which is contrary to assumptions guiding research in this area. Key words: Women's health, cervical cancer screening, vaginal smears, mammography, psychosocial oncology, focus group
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Austin, L. T., Ahmad, F., McNally, M.-J., & Stewart, D. E. (2002). Breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women: A literature review using the health belief model. Women's Health Issues, 12, 122 127.
    • Basen-Engquist, K., Paskett, E. D., Buzaglo, J., Miller, S. M., Schover, L., Wenzel, L. B., et al. (2003). Cervical cancer. Cancer, 98(9 Suppl), 2009 2014.
    • Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1996). Health and responsibility from social change to technological change and vice versa. In H. Haker, R. Hearn, & K. Siegleder (Eds.), Ethics of human genome analysis European perspectives (pp. 199 216). Tu¨ bingen: Attempto Verlag.
    • Bendelow, G., Carpenter, M., Vautier, C. & Williams, S. (Eds.), (2002). Gender, health and healing. The public/private divide. London and New York: Routledge.
    • Bierman, A. S. (2003). Climbing out of our boxes: Advancing women's health for the twenty-first century. Women's Health Issues, 13, 201 203.
    • Blaxter, M. (2004). Health. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Bottorff, J. L., Balneaves, L. G., Sent, L., Grewal, S., & Browne, A. J. (2001). Cervical cancer screening in ethnocultural groups: Case studies in women-centered care. Women & Health, 33, 29 46.
    • Burrows, R., Nettleton, S., & Bunton, R. (1995). Sociology and health promotion: Health, risk and consumption under late modernism. In R. Bunton, S. Nettleton, & R. Burrows (Eds.), The sociology of health promotion. Clinical analyses of consumption, lifestyle and risk (pp. 1 9). London and New York: Routledge.
    • Byrd, T. L., Peterson, S. K., Chavez, R., & Heckert, A. (2004). Cervical cancer screening beliefs among young Hispanic women. Preventive Medicine, 38, 192 197.
    • Dinnerstein, M., & Weitz, R. (1998). Jane Fonda, Barbara Bush, and other aging bodies, femininity and the limits of resistance. In R. Weitz (Ed.), The politics of women's bodies sexuality, appearance, and behaviour (pp. 189 203). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Eaker, S. (2003). Optimization of compliance in epidemiologic research and disease prevention. With special emphasis on PAPsmear screening. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.
    • Elfgren, K. (2003). Longitudinal studies of human papillomavirus infection. With special reference to screening for cervical cancer and treatment of CIN. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.
    • Emami, A., & Tishelman, C. (2004). Reflections on cancer in the context of women's health. focus group interviews with Iranian immigrant women in Sweden. Women & Health, 39, 75 96.
    • Farquhar, C. (1999). Are focus groups suitable for ''sensitive'' topics? In R. S. Barbour, & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research politics, theory and practice (pp. 47 63). London: Sage.
    • Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    • Forss, A., Tishelman, C., Widmark, C., Lundgren, E.-L., Sachs, L., & To¨ rnberg, S. (2001). I got a letter . . . '' A qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening program in urban Sweden. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 76 87.
    • Forss, A., Tishelman, C., Widmark, C., & Sachs, L. (2004). Women's experiences of cervical cellular changes: An unintentional transition from health to liminality? Sociology of Health & Illness, 26, 306 325.
    • Garland, S. (2002). Human papillomavirus update with a particular focus on cervical disease. Pathology, 34, 213 224.
    • Hancock, P., Hughes, B., Jagger, E., Paterson, K., Russel, R., Tulle-Winton, E., et al. (2000). The body, culture and society. An introduction. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    • Idestr o¨m, M., Milsom, I., & Andersson-Ellstr o¨m, A. (2002). Knowledge and attitudes about the Pap-smear screening program: A population-based study of women aged 20 59 years. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 81, 962 967.
    • Kaufert, P. A., & Lock, M. (1997). Medicalization of women's third age. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 18, 81 86.
    • Kirwan, J., & Herrington, S. (2001). Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: Where are we now? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108, 1204 1213.
    • Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299 302.
    • Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. S. (1999). Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups. In R. Barbour, & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research politics, theory and practice (pp. 1 20). London: Sage.
    • Krantz, I., Lo¨whagen, G. B., Ahlberg, B. M., & Nilstun, T. (2004). Ethics of screening for asymptomatic herpes virus type 2 infection. British Medical Journal, 329, 618 621.
    • Lagerlund, M., Widmark, C., Lambe, M., & Tishelman, C. (2001). Rationales for attending or not attending mammography screening*a focus group study among women in Sweden. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 10, 429 442.
    • Lupton, D. (2000). The social construction of medicine and the body. In G. L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, & S. C. Scrimshaw (Eds.), The handbook of social studies in health & medicine (pp. 56 57). London: Sage.
    • Lupton, D. (2003). Medicine as culture (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
    • Madlensky, L., Goel, V., Polzer, J., & Ashbury, F. D. (2003). Assessing the evidence for organised cancer screening programmes. European Journal of Cancer, 39, 1648 1653.
    • Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129 152.
    • National Board of Health and Welfare. (1997). Ha¨lounderso¨ kning med mammografi [Mammography screening for detection of breast cancer]. (In Swedish). SOSFS, 1997:27. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
    • National Board of Health and Welfare. (1998). Gynekologisk cellprovskontroll. Fo¨ rslag till screeningprogram 1998 [Gynaecological smear control. Proposition to a screening programme 1998]. (In Swedish), SoS-report 1998:15. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
    • O'Connor, A. M., Tugwell, P., Wells, G. A., Elmslie, T., Jolly, E., Hollingworth, G., et al. (1998). A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: Decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Education and Counselling, 33, 267 279.
    • Penrod, J., Preston, D., Cain, R., & Starks, M. (2003). A discussion of chain referral as a method of sampling hardto-reach populations. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 14, 100 107.
    • Redelmeier, D. A., Rozin, P., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Understanding patients' decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 72 76.
    • Thomas, E. C. (2004). African American women's breast memories, cancer beliefs, and screening behaviors. Cancer Nursing, 27, 295 302.
    • Thorne, S., Reimer Kirkham, S., & MacDonald-Emes, J. (1997). Interpretative description: A noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Research in Nursing and Health, 20, 169 177.
    • Thorne, S., Reimer Kirkham, S. & O'Flynn-Magee, K. (2004). The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1 21. Retrieved November 14, 2004, from http://www.ualberta.ca/ iiqm/ backissues/3_1/pdf/thorneetal.pdf
    • Thorne, S., Con, A., McGuinness, L., McPherson, G., & Harris, S.R. (2004). Health care communication issues in multiple sclerosis: An interpretive description. Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), 5 22.
    • Waller, J., McCaffery, K., & Wardle, J. (2004). Beliefs about the risk factors for cervical cancer in a British population sample. Preventive Medicine, 38, 745 753.
    • Wiley, D. J., Monk, B. J., Masongsong, E., & Morgan, K. (2004). Cervical cancer screening. Current Oncology Reports, 6, 497 506.
    • Williams, J. J., Santoso, J. T., Ling, F. W., & Przepiorka, D. (2003). Pap smear noncompliance among female obstetricsgynecology residents. Gynecologic oncology, 90, 597 600.
    • Williams, S. J. (2003). Medicine and the body. London: Sage Publications.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from