Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hansen, Jens C.; Gilman, Andrew P. (2012)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: International Journal of Circumpolar Health
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Arctic populations, benefits, diet, mercury, n-3 fatty acids, risk assessment, selenium
Recent and powerful epidemiological studies have been used as a basis for revising international and domestic guidelines for human exposure to mercury. Long-range transport of mercury into the Arctic makes some Arctic peoples consuming traditional marine foods, especially newborns, children and pregnant women, very vulnerable to harmful exposures. The WHO, the USEPA and Health Canada have all recently revised their mercury intake guidelines as a result of neurological effects reported in children exposed in utero and adults. Guidance values are equivalent to 0.23 μg/kg-bw/d, 0.1 μg/kg-bw/d and 0.2 μg/kg-bw/d respectively. Differences between the numbers represent slight differences in the uncertainty factors applied, rather than in toxicological interpretation. More recent findings suggest that mercury may also be a factor in ischemic heart disease, which could lower guidance values in the future. Considering the benefits of marine fatty acids (n–3 fatty acids) and guidance that populations consume 300-400g fish/week, consumers face a reality that most open ocean and relatively ‘unpolluted’ fish species contain levels of mercury that would lead to exposures at current guidance levels. Clearly, there is no more room for further mercury pollution and there is an urgent need for international action to reduce mercury emissions. Concomitantly, while there may be a need for public health authorities to provide consumption advisories to some highly exposed populations, such as in the Arctic, there remains a need to better understand the interactions and benefits associated with marine foods that may reduce health risks associated with low-level mercury exposure.(Int J Circumpolar Health 2005; 64(2):121-136)Keywords: Arctic populations, benefits, diet, mercury, n-3 fatty acids, risk assessment, selenium
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Rice DC, Schoeny R, Mahaffey K. Methods and rationale for derivation of a reference dose for methylmercury by the U.S. EPA. Risk Analysis 2003; 23: 107-115.
    • 2. Suk WA, Avakian MD, Carpenter D, Groopman JD, Scammell M,Wild CP. Human exposure monitoring and evaluation in the Arctic:The importance of understanding exposure to the development of public health policy. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112: 113-120.
    • 3. Harada M. Minamata disease: Methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol 1995; 25: 1-24.
    • 4. Schroeder WH,Anlauf K, Barrie LA, et al.Arctic springtime depletion of mercury. Nature 1998; 394: 331-332
    • 5. AMAP. 2002. Arctic Pollution 2002. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) Oslo Norway. 112 pp.
    • 6. Åberg B, Ekman L, Falk R, Greitz U, Persson G and Snihs J.O. Metabolism of methylmercury (203-Hg) compounds in man.Arch Environ Health 1969; 19: 478-484.
    • 7. WHO. Environmental Health Criteria 101: Methylmercury. International Programme on Chemical Safety, WHO, Geneva 1990.
    • 8. Hunter D, Bomford R, Russel D. Poisoning by methylmercury compounds. Q J Med 1940; 35: 193-213.
    • 9. Bakir F, Damluji SF, Amin-Zaki L et al. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Science 1973; 181: 230-241.
    • 10. Davis LE, Kornfeld M, Mooney HS, et al. Poisoning: longterm clinical, radiological, toxicological, and pathological studies of an affected family.Ann Neurol 1994; 35: 680- 688.
    • 11. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency).Water quality criterion for the protection of human health: Methyl mercury. Washington 2001. Available at www. epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/methylmercury
    • 12. Grandjean P,Weihe P,White RF, et al. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997; 19: 417-428.
    • 13. Butz-Jørgensen E, Grandjean P, Keiding N,White RF and Weihe P. Benchmark dose calculations of methylmercury associated neurohehavioural deficits.Toxicol Lett 2000; 112-113: 193-199.
    • 14. Shamlaye CF, March DO, Myers GJ, et al.The Seychelle child development study on neurodevelopmental outcomes in children following in utero exposure to met hylmercury from maternal fish diet: Background and de mographics. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16: 597-612.
    • 15. Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C, et al. Effects of prenatal and postnatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption on neurodevelopment: outcome at 66 months of age in the Seychelles Child Development Study, JAMA 1998; 280: 701-707.
    • 16. Crump K, Landingham C, Shamlaye C, et al. Benchmark calculations for methylmercury obtained from the Seychelles child development study. Environ Health Perspect 2000; 108: 257-263.
    • 17. Myers G, Davidson P, Palumbo C, et al. Secondary analysis from Seychelles child development study: the child behavior checklist. Environ Res Sect A 2000; 84: 12-19.
    • 18. Axtell C, Cox C, Myers G, et al. Association between methylmercury exposure from fish consumption and child development at five and a half years of age in the Seychelles child development study: an evaluation of nonlinear relationship. Environ Res Sect A 2000; 84: 71-80.
    • 19. Palumbo D, Cox C, Davidson P, et al.Association between prenatal exposure to methylmercury and cognitive function in Seychelloise children: a reanalysis of the McCarthy scales of children's ability from the main cohort study. Environ Res Sect A 2000; 84: 81-88.
    • 20. Chapman L and Chan HM.The influence of nutrition on methylmercury intoxication. Env Health Perspect 2000; 108 (suppl. 1): 29-56.
    • 21. European Commission.Ambient air pollution by mercury (Hg). Position Paper 2001;Available at http://europa.eu. int/comm/environment/air/background.htm#mercury.
    • 22. Bemis JC and Seegal RF. Polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury act synergistically to reduce rat brain dopamine content in vitro. Environ Health Perspect 1999; 107: 879-885.
    • 23. Bemis JC and Seegal RF. Polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury alter intracellular calcium concentrations in rat cerebellar granule cells. Neurotoxicology 2000; 21: 1123-1134.
    • 24. Yokoo EM, Valente JG, Grattan L, Schmidt SL, Platt I, Silbergeld EK. Low level methylmercury exposure affects neuropsychological functions in adults. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 2003; 2: 8. http://www.ehjournal.net/content/2/1/8
    • 25. Odland JO, Deutch B, Hansen JC, Burkow IC. The Importance of diet on exposure and effects of persistent organic pollutants on human health in the Arctic. Acta Paediatr 2003; 92: 1255-1266.
    • 26. AMAP, 2003.AMAP Assessment 2002: Human Health in the Arctic.Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo Norway: xiv+137 pp.
    • 27. Kjellstrom T, Kennedy P,Wallis S, Mantell C. Physical and mental development of children with prenatal exposure to mercury from fish. Stage I: Preliminary tests at age 4. National Swedish Environmental Protection Board Report 3080 1986; Solna, Sweden.
    • 28. Kjellstrom T, Kennedy P,Wallis S, et al. Physical and mental development of children with prenatal exposure to mercury from fish. Stage II: Interviews and psychological tests at age 6. National Swedish Environmental Protection Board Report 3642 1989; Solna, Sweden.
    • 29. WHO. Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants.WHO Food Additives Series 44, International Programme on Chemical Safety, WHO, Geneva 2000.
    • 30. WHO. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants. Sixty-first meeting. Summary and Conclusions. 2003; Published on the web at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/jecfa/jecfa61sc.pdf
    • 31. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Mercury Study Report to Congress. Vol I.: Executive Summary. 1997; EPA-452/R-97-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, and Office of Research and Development.
    • 32. US NRC (U.S. National Research Council).Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. National Academy Press 2000;Washington, DC.
    • 33. Crump K,Viren J, Silvers A, Clewell 3rd H, Gearhart J, Shipp A. Reanalysis of dose-response data from the Iraqi methylmercury poisoning episode, Risk Anal 1995; 15(4): 523-532.
    • 34. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Mercury Study for Congress.Vol VII: Characterization of Human Health and Wildlife Risks from Mercury Exposure in the United States 1997; EPA-452/R-97-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, and Office of Research and Development.
    • 35. US ATSDR.Toxicological Profile for Mercury (Update). Atlanta, GA: U.S.Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 1999.
    • 36. Salonen JT, Seppänen K, Nyyssönen K, et al. Intake of mercury from fish, lipid peroxidation, and the risk of myocardial infarction and coronary, cardiovascular, and any death in eastern Finnish men. Circulation 1995; 91: 654-655.
    • 37. Rissanen T,Voutilainen S, Nyyssönen K, Lakka TA, Salonen JT. Fish-oil derived fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid, and the risk of acute coronary event. Circulation 2000; 102: 2677-2679.
    • 38. Sørensen N, Murata K, Butz-Jørgensen E, Weihe P, Grandjean P. Prenatal methylmercury exposure as a cardiovascular risk factor at seven years of age. Epidemiology 1999; 10: 370-375.
    • 39. Guallar E, Sans-Gallardo I, Van´t Veer P, et al. Mercury, fish oils, and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1747-1754.
    • 40. Casiglia E, Tikhonoff V, Mazza A, Piccoli A, Pessina AC. Pulse Pressure and coronary mortality in elderly men and women from general population. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 611-620.
    • 41. Gonzalvo MC, Gil F, Hernández AF, Villanueva E, Pla A. Inhibition of paraoxonase activity in human liver microsomes by exposure to EDTA, metals and mercurials. Chemico-Biological Interactions 1997; 105: 169-179.
    • 42. Aviram M, Rosenblat M, Billecke S, et al. Human serum paraoxonase (PON 1) is inactivated by oxidized low density lipoprotein and preserved by antioxidants. Free Radic Biol Med 1999; 26: 892-904.
    • 43. Watson AD, Berliner JA, Hama SY, et al. Protective effect of high density lipoprotein associated paraoxonase. Inhibition of the biological activity of minimally oxidizes low density lipoprotein. J Clin Invest 1995; 96: 2882-2891.
    • 44. Meltzer HM, Mundal HH, Alexander J, Bibow K,Ydersbond TA. Does dietary arsenic and mercury affect cutaneous bleeding time and blood lipids in humans? Biol Trace Elem Res 1994; 46: 135-153.
    • 45. Salonen JT, Seppanan K, Lakka TA, Salonen R, Kaplan GA. Mercury accumulation and accelerated progression of carotid atherosclerosis: a population-based prospective 4-year follow-up study in men in eastern Finland.Atherosclerosis 2000; 148: 265-273.
    • 46. Wijendran V, Hayes KC. Dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acid balance and cardiovascular health.Annu Rev Nutr 2004; 24:597-615
    • 47. Black PN and S Sharpe. Dietary fat and asthma: is there a connection? Eur Respir J 1997 Jan; 10(1): 6-12.
    • 48. Clarke SD, Gasperikova D, Nelson C, Lapillone A, Heird WC. Fatty acid regulation of gene expression.A genomic explanation for the benefits of the mediterranean diet. Ann NY Acad Sci 2002; 967: 283-298.
    • 49. Mori TA, Bao DQ, Burke V, Puddey IB,Watts GF, Beilin LJ. Dietary fish as a major component of a weight-loss diet: effect on serum lipids, glucose, and insulin metabolism in overweight hypertensive subjects.Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 70: 817-825.
    • 50. Simonopolous AP, Leaf A, Salem N jr. Essentiality of and recommended dietary intakes for omega-6 and omega3 fatty acids.Ann Nutr Metab 1999; 315: 10-19.
    • 51. Kris-Etherton PM,Taylor DS,Yu-Poth S, et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in the food chain in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 71: 179-188.
    • 52. US EPA. Consumption Advice: Joint Federal Advisory for Mercury in Fish - What you need to know about mercury in fish and shelfish. www.epa.gov/ost/fishadvice. 2004
    • 53. Health Canada.Advisory: Information on mercury levels in fish. www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/protection /warnings 2001.
    • 54. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Background note on EFSA risk assessment related to mercury and methylmercury in food. 2004. Available at: http:// www.efsa.eu.int
    • 55. Weihe P, Steuerwald U, Taheri S, Faerø O, Veyhe AS, Nicolaisen D.The human health programme in the Faroe Islands 1985-2001. Chapt 6 in: AMAP Greenland and the Faroe Islands 1997-2001.Vol 1 Human Health. Deutch B and Hansen JC (eds). DANCEA (Danish Cooperation for Environment in the Arctic), Ministry of Environment, 2003 Copenhagen.
    • 56. Myers GJ, Davidson PW, Cox C, et al. Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles child development dtudy.The Lancet 2003; 361: 1686-1692.
    • 57. Keiding N, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Grandjean P. Prenatal methylmercury exposure in the Seychelles. Lancet 2003;362:664-665.
    • 59. Aguilar A, Borrell A, Reijnders PJ. Geographical and temporal variation in the levels of organochlorine contaminants in marine mammals. Mar Environ Res 2000; 53:425-452.
    • 59. Yoshizawa K, Rimm EB, Morris JS et al. Mercury and the risk of coronary heart disease in men. New Engl J Med 2002;347:1755-1760.
    • 60. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.Agriculture:Towards 2015/2030. Rome, 2000
    • 61. Calder PC. N-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: evidence explained and mechanisms explored. Clinical Science 2004;107:1-11
    • 62. Ergin A, Munter P, Sherwin R, He J. Secular trends in cardiovascular disease mortality, incidence, and case fatality rates in adults in the United States. Am J Med 2004;117:219-227.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from