Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gryning, S. E.; Lyck, E.; Hedegaard, K. (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Equipment to measure the dispersion of a release of the tracer sulphurhexafluoride (SF6) was developed and nine experiments were then performed at the Risø National Laboratory in the period April to July 1976. The tracer was released at 60 m from the Risø meteorological tower, situated on a peninsula in the Roskilde Fjord, Denmark, and was sampled at ground-level positions distributed over a crosswind line about 1 km downwind. During the experiments, the turbulent wind velocity components were measured at the height of release with a three-dimensional ultrasonic anemometer. The experiments were performed in westerly winds, hence the dispersion was influenced by the internal boundary layer developing downwind from the inhomogeneity in surface roughness between the fjord and the site. Five of the experiments, performed in neutral and slightly unstable conditions, were accepted as cases of purely turbulent dispersion of the tracer. Because of wind direction shifts the others were discarded. The concentration measurements allowed a direct estimate of the lateral dispersion parameter ??. The Taylor diffusion formula using the wind velocity measurements at the height of release was found to work well in predicting ?i, despite the fact that shortcomings in fulfilling the requirements for its application existed. ?i, predicted by an empirical formula characteristic for an open area (Bultynck and Malet, 1972), was found to be systematically larger than the experimental value. Excellent agreement was found by multiplying the predicted ?i values by the factor 0.6. This indicates that the effect of surface roughness can be separated from the effect of stability. Because the estimates of the vertical dispersion parameter, ?z, were only indirectly inferred from continuity considerations, they could not, although fair agreement was obtained, be used to check the validity of calculating ?1 from Taylor's formula or from the empirical formula mentioned above.DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1978.tb00855.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bultynck, H. and Malet, L. 1969. Diffusion turbulente de efluents emis d a m lhtmosphere p a r une source PlevPe a ;mission continue en relation avec la stabiliti de [hir. BLG 434, Studie Centrum voor Kernenergie (S.C.K./C.E.N.), Mol.
    • Bultynck, H. and Malet, L. M. 1972. Evaluation of atmospheric dilution factors for efAuents diffused from an elevated continuous point source. Tellus 2 4 , 455- 47 1.
    • Busch, N. E. and Panofsky, H. A. 1968. Recent spectra of atmospheric turbulence. Quart. J.R. Met. Soc. 94, 132-148.
    • Busch, N. E. 1973. On the mechanics of atmospheric turbulence. In Workshop on micrometeorology (ed. D. A. Haugen), pp. 1-65. Boston: American Meteorological Society.
    • Cagnetti, P. 1975. Downwind concentrations of an airborne tracer released in the neighbourhood of a building. Atmos. Environ. 9 , 739-747.
    • Csanady, G. T., Hilst, G. R. and Bowne, N. E. 1968. Turbulent diffusion from a cross-wind line source in shear flow at Fort Wayne, Indiana. Atmos. Environ. 2, 273-292.
    • Drivas, P. J. and Shair, F. H. 1974. Probing the air flow within the wake downwind of a building by means of a tracer technique. Atmos. Environ. 8, 1165-1 175.
    • Elliott, W. P. 1958. The growth of the atmospheric boundary layer. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 39, 1048-1054.
    • Elliott, W. P. 1961. The vertical diffusion of gas from a continuous source. Int. J. Air and Water Poll. 4 , 33- 46.
    • Hanna, S. R., Briggs, G. A., Deardorff, J., Egan, B. A., Gifford, F. A. and Pasquill, F. 1977. AMS workshop on stability classification schemes and sigma curvesSummary of recommendations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. SOC.58, 1305- 1309.
    • Hay, J. S. and Pasquill, F. 1959. Diffusion from a continuous source in relation to the spectrum and scale of turbulence. In Atmospheric dzyision and air pollution (eds. F. N. Frenkiel and P. A. Sheppard), pp. 345-365. Advances in Geophysics 6, Academic Press.
    • Jensen, N. 0. 1975. The planetary boundary layer as experienced by analytical, numerical and physical means. Rista Report No. 330, Rise, National Laboratory, 344 pp. (in press).
    • Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard. J. C.. Izumi, Y. and Cote, 0. R. 1972. Spectral characteristics of surface layer turbulence. Quart. J.R. Met. SOC.98, 563-589.
    • Lumley, J. L. and Panofsky, H. A. 1964. The structure of atmospheric turbulence, 239 pp. New York: Interscience.
    • McElroy, J. L. 1969. A comparative study of urban and rural dispersion. J . Appl. Meteor. 8 , 19-3 1.
    • Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M. 1971. Statisticalfluid mechanics: Mechanics of turbulence (ed. J. L. Lumley), Ch. 5. London: The M.I.T. Press.
    • Panofsky, H. A. and Petersen, E. L. 1972. Wind profiles and change of terrain roughness at Rim. Quart. J.R. Met. SOC.98, 845-854.
    • Pasquill, F. 1962. Atmospheric diffusion, 274 pp. London: D. van Nostrand Co. Ltd.
    • Pooler, F. 1966. A tracer study of dispersion over a city. J. Air Pollut. Control Ass. 11,677-68 1.
    • Sato, J. 1975. Estimation of turbulence diffusivity over the Tokyo metropolitan area from constant-volume balloons. Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics 26, No. 2, 35-46.
    • Smith, D. E. 1968a. Tracer study in an urban valley. J . Air Pollut. Control Ass. 18, 6 0 G 6 0 4 .
    • Smith, M. 1968b. Recommended guide f o r the prediction of the dispersion of airborne efJluents. No. 68-31123, 84 pp. New York: Am. SOC.Mech. Eng.
    • Taylor, G. I. 1921. Diffusion by continuous movements. Proc. London Math. SOC.Ser. 2, 196-21 1.
    • Turner, D. B. 1970. Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates. Public Health Service Pub. No. 999-AP-26. Cincinnati: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
    • Wandel, C. F. and Kofoed-Hansen, 0. 1962. On the Eulerian-Lagrangian transform in the statistical theory of turbulence. J. Geophys. Res. 67, 3089-3093.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from